| OCR Text |
Show a SALT LAKE uscripts and Hebrew Bible, scripts, up man to take the rather made by who Hebrew far [ say I would one that might learned rather the disparage accept who by however deeply he as chosen for as it or Bible set the by By regard any I men hundreds of this Bible various languages. among They have been sent forth the earth for of inhabitants the in by their P'OLYGAMISTS We will pass upon was stated nature of the Bible that is and proof in regard to polygamy. the course of the remarks of the relation to polygamy, to choose, feel disposed in IT÷ woman one two of It adultery. more will sentences: Savior's Lord the the his With part this of man,according looks upon desires be I an a with the Lord man who Jesus If there is the New take to a the in this, nor its force. Dr. tion, plainly such forms of an I its the is a be expressed laid before From this the ob set forth feel like given. this curse the were this give authority rine institution? and It these rebutting divine sanction. and paper to terms were passage to especially, where all in not the things the people let all say, under this Almighty the polygamists. be to practise sanction, word Did that or di do not I defined as arguments by presented ARGUMENT. NOT ready like such as certainly was pared tion, not only upon the whole brought time occupied was forth? heaven, of my to as ine left. eleven rebut the minutes numerous and sanction sure but he into this word on the committing see lust; great the of one that is just the of plural form lle did The argument man, as says, Paul his is with this "Man is nor tread her his side? from fifty women, Jesus says; not may he the one yesterday; why, if than man a that When has InorC come man can serve one and hate the from the other. the should in we have and gentleman polyandry, than one, to there no is and Cain's wife, and on, were examined forth by Now to the me form woman this afternoon, as followed me, having we woman in the we are ment Nod and marrying All these time. that testimonies sacrifice, a things brought were to took: that one Cain it a for that the land to to land of suppose the to is went into and We he God not took before will I speaker of Nod thing the land in of to his took with in or fifty bond assist race? I it; it, and gamists, they ing than one husband Even if another unknown. who ledge of and Is this the the means. Nod father It is the is case man have as distinct as not destroyed, on the father, is tent, more obtaining the did in the be be reasonable, of pur the on five, the of or ten, wives, the knowledge The the for of' hav. own offspring, there way father -the so? All the know children. No, by knowledge of of great husband, Therefore it the first woman her wives? fifty knowlodge here a among lost plurality of the destroy have not preserved. a would therefore. part say that difficulty a a parentage hin; for with If examine instituted their their the mother. principle of was better who it of rather be the the re l'salm, and repeated evil- should not should inherit inherit blessings and it upon some , the arguments forward and to have [I sustain gentleman the if quoted to acceptable those hare brought in vIe matter, and of what dren, they "lest and has joined take the fill filled law. woman, ordinance of went ordinance forward it God never had the wicked was only Ic and outward to permit to permitted sight the Joseph permitted Ile did but the with them, lie brethren. in not to the com had remained because to until a Ilim, human race, of the Heaven. marriages into a wise the time people pure will lis and serve Him. such marriages. honor to does not sanction EQUALITY If the we should census pur own with an equality that of argument of thus sought to be cause there may be is more consis. procreation and secondly bers, parentage. that man and I therefore. every have made not of ho advanced to an appear man must must have one will The be can where and learned York mistresses but. and be indeed midst; and We feel philan a and try "awful the free are to re baustly" very fond comply with a great of' Christians. FOR SOCIAL. EVIl. THE TIMES. subject;much, who upon the their midst.• great we call too, that ought themselves civil enormities, expect theologians at to great great the commerce. of some the of' forth, hold and lessons principles the Look metropolis might walk to the be very by of teach Christian streets polygamy; over pious the thousands open day, is sin enough committed there to sink the down by city CASE like and tens well as as in yet har of thou by night. oue twenty -four and Go.norrah. Sodom THE GIBE was once a case of prostitution of Benjunin in ancient days, OF men came and took another man's wife. or whichever to please call her; you some her abused and called were up they were result of the her as said forth and fight Anl crime--not rest against the of the it, and was the what crime little of' The Israel. Benjamin. next sin m to up thousands? of the and men 003 d, not tribes tribe con that called n instead of crime Benjamin, against They were would the to for they that one one; and confederates. little one God night; but offenders that Lord all account. to viewed nearly of the for whole act one day Go They they were are threatened lies tics lie that prostitution all the inflict cities be torn from us piety of ciyilization have pointed much a at and in ancient even great in penalties heavy the I the and pun a be driven mu4; our be la ni misery, to which in in mountain low us; upon Israel the Vition; this marriage of llow was this of individuals Bible practising to existed the few aL Benjamin of must cause their tribe prostitution. of strictness because then Territory have but femalcs, rebut idea is equality confined husband. of hours, be the exist. more time, Gentlemen? (*One minute.") and males the city and and cannot say much ment now call upon gentleman'that reverend in with the whoredoms, fanticide practised in hearken He permita, established. every woman now the exist Compare by wise educating laws, reflect New ishment NON- ESSENTIAL. A argue shows when come obey who posterity shall people nine MODERN this of tion of Egypt His will they poor and they fought until they cut off again so commanded; the entire tribe except six hundred men. The destruc the because and the themselves those lots fought per the he arguments characteristics on York, ex said has his abroad. of that he should take not and min of being said they favor only our do call inculcating a great Ma purposes; instruments who did the deed. So he permits these unauthorized mar between wicked riages men and wicked women, to petuate not faces be the that forth MADE RESPONSIBLE New deliver well as of for who upon, in seven Newman Dr. benefit We those into justice represented customs may and took they man God that, be deed enter months, many is a cubine, a he for justify are me; bring the nine well arguments would OF of Some that Simon perhaps sold for as these to among lest all observance do hours drawn not therefore, people. that there We real the children married baptized, Heaven, acceptable anything chil which that sinfulness; the through and had in while nine TIE place might say was and of hardened of' and the have cannot, to them they hours support unrighteous You me? left is I the one pretend marriage a baptism, the in who an together. he ordinance, as between these with cities," can time to that evils leav to parents people in that by the Lord person is from Scripture world us possible con only granted Scriptures. sands There Con polygamy of people, a with No parties had passed his be the condition pose, should the unrighteous gus, when plied with he The consummated an a said. enlighten if itv. po life. eternal approved of of lis to not to the offspring testimonies, passages destruction should marriage are many have now I commands world wicked the pure subject other and righteous a acknowledge various are been to the must we from the the examine pre carth. forth him that with powerful marriages We with informed occasion, of ing and What exists in the midst of that city? Females females by the tens of thousands, who are debauched Most High, by day and by night; fem les who are in open day per and married ading the streets of that great city! Why, they arc How much monogamists there! It is a portion of the civilization were they have exalted could those God the to the would of' the of that who this flood, being but Instead sons had to ens. the wives, hardship testimonies this social That received that I on when city been when of to chil come and much but is ized, those the of wicked manner How time crimson to before Lord. face all philanthropy years and protectors. have Territory, the Much righteous the who am I and many itself have Lord the in but weeks great destroy destroy the into those of. five suffer and upon, wish he a or wives natural it dungeons down in this in poor would than 80 laid their we generous is more four, of' arguments reason I the to had before entered their families errors. many to DIONOGAMY wicked? nor our reasonings corrupted had the among to Noah men de-! were from or we are languages this marriage of if abroad original incarcerate three, Bible happy from think come the it, very much hap minutes.") Utah. people therefore, and form mountain examine of how ar are learned embraced come and for We the misunderstand laws a have some to we thropist and missionary in claim this poor people from compared married side. have gentlemen; hearts full of of nine us those polygamy; his | would the taught the wickedness, among other CONFRERES have I thin us to right. set Newman like (lod mar the subject. precepts, robbed would would world plural with patience this the their training friends rest with them before you the of form acquainted enact nected your of' any age and learned and up Does that would There the #l said, should the have of their of lutes with God, committed that regard men, obliged sequently, On part Israel 27th We if its tearing have of monogamist among They day life the and to them in I those faith; practise notonly to of being vince I us. to ("Seven Jacob when same? were nor of' and with them, with exist children iniquity of teachings God, Who righteous fathers along his Which the the consummated 110 the like the to LEARNED on teach Dr. here | principles them wisdom not their offspring from in argu multiplying Would it would father will she great the in Does it tend to rapidly monogamists as well as poly think reflect, more as us or until were will admonition of not race. honor contrary in it and it; monogamista, of in great to while with man he and hell? Would antediluvian thank great or offspring that im his manner to do hunger, by eternal Gol; all marriages intermarriages that found for Lord four, having when fruitfulness. far Let the not lygamists sec having species in principle, marriages opposite. The human the did He woman marriage--for of the sixty or the light. same dren, bringing Creator? enemies? pos chil wives, o* your her those and lead twenty limited your They one show the so great marriage in daughters wives au well as passages HIS with send prison, a and down entrust himself AND Territory, part pretend, childre.r the the The obtain them your to ark. the privilege. sanction him procreation. woman husbands? species, crease true polyandry be his a marriage--the sacred pose of multiplying Does with agree namely, be suppose this; wife out would Abel. I stated had created any Cain I would com yesterday such that are we land no that that great correction state the by brother Nod a then suppose Nod. rather beginning not his of or first However, did there Cain murdered not 1 the make Lamech; went Cain wife, second, human fourth, is, the represented was that in the man." let me and the Ilere carried is earth. proceed he subject, stated were in but the argument. married after wife will for to I Cain's IRRELEVANT. we this Bible. and were untouched. on that those position dwell upon with regard there of land occupied created mence the marriage established of prevention. given may with the take Another 'eleven minutes the of sacrifice to and then, fifth close Abel's going so the prefer marriages it until you and without examining the passage and trying to show the Scriptures. Com What is the object of marriage? did that not command polygamy, another item that panionship, we are told. I the agree with gentleman. was referred to by myself with regard to Tamech and Another object he says is procreation. I with agree Cain was brought up. of the Insicad of an examination gentleman also in the second object. was that passage, the subject of leads regard proved the or his up finally with that of unto instructing Kingdom on God. them, they the in brings over not sanctions be you will this us to and of correct who righteous hand to of woman more Lord His has in are book; wife by who with? the referred the Because He they principle argument the to those raise and ple pleased workers is hug seed the forth be most in evil have the same Bible we have not the teaching that not prefer instead of yonder dispute could THE wicked Abraham and the Kingdom times, or and to right ancient that | the no was taking at opponent not there, reverend to of life had it their brought God the contrary man lead Lord cleave to that brought rule acting should to delights the and example ten, children, so truth, his or Scriptures, gentleman and by the head. that 3.9 a 110- who A nurture fire, of masters,' take themselves refer limit that wait us be the has precepts CONSIDERED. for among would and in here py, Being; in Lord or protecting wicked the divine monogamy; NEWMAN consistent 1 the and But OF find shall T superior a choose, is who a you flesh other, has blasphemy, them can guments mono- power had as all two that ten, up women; forty in WELCOMED. idolatry, the destruction. to Therefore the protecting privilege expressed we come husbands under to DR. own the MARRIAGE his two Why? to proof do to his into fell that until nearest lies as he established it or lIe may the the tyrannize Why did he rib Which of form. to a wicked the other. upon afternoon to hear well unright- nothing has he and are who the woman. Not only women, tell women, reverend the expressed is not polyandry, the woman a one, of away examine is their family. Lord. take or had is the is all under and not the POLYANDRY us there foot. five the turn so old, Go and makes the as perhaps given THE wickedness learned wicked. he generation bestows passages riage or up them the head, the wicked righteous those no upon between the refute lind many more them, He this can are when if expressly expect do nothing wires, righteousness light the His bestowed equality varth, curses to Ile by will instruct question with while there should the shall I ! the prosper. polygamy this of away with may argue, before children in side out But by as will that hear between has psalm, In from perfect a I bless together dispensed and of are and that polygamists again, we polygamis example. down righteous mo woman," the Ic man under may love women Now let to did be to) like that havenamed, God wife, a he the other and people this, done consistent. drunkenness, inherit eternal polygamists of with consistent should this, in "No and with so of women, two head. my position but the from Because woman, women, the head her the as with some some a be rain sanction. prove so-called if has God set may fifty upon the it believe Because showing from the Why foot? female his had beau to in of prove and allied not that To and righteous hord's does it females earth, done be the have this rooted accomplish wives and should than to Therefore, find men, human the his a to by bring POLYGAMY. of' up them as of righteous joined blessings in that being And afterwards say, wicked of couple find itiod. unjust. blessings. sons. forty That has SANCTION Lord; evils Luther man [ had showing the these to sult. the hu righteous? the their nation have the sev- wonders these perfectly He very lle that a the The forth ol' and sends lle the amount the blessings the prefer would a to designs the this, males female. himself Be saying of that relationship the without again number might we have the bring his was bring of' matter. may unto take the It be the 1 is moralities. may another, polygamy the perfectly from the his wife, the then that ground. upon and was me call cited, dren one whatever is here, a terity man wife. of sons, NOT DOES posterity: and to Could seventy-two Now, the that of to take degradation all know. forth we gentleman with salration may mankind monogamic sons. bring Israel Gideon -two Right abroad murder, see just as woman the position. is been marriage who seventy-two power day bands old. same between those than WICKED. scripture, look as we us do GOD humanity REBUT to appropriate, of of it If reverend to power by Abel? of the give connection. whether beget exam being. we concerning applicable as as take not other had of When well nogamy., The answer of Martin him, the put to why God took If be just is the 'To to; it degree vain. test angel would the this form. other. the the servant there dirine or fallen a the by the produced And to righteousness the Being who man NOT Luther, a seventy-two. had a the referred gentleman Martin establish in DOES when come in the of has it. to; to DOCTRINE to in we No into because of heaven. law knows, that all to exist the Who marriage? enough destroying What arise, They woman one another judge but entered of tiful the forth has called of "mandrake," that destruc are manner family for but called herb, while com well stand between husband and argument. fault I have no of small and thing as might man, referred some be to what But when luman not miraculous thing with early, ages, the exists minutes in crime introducing all herb gamic as the the compared be death globe; learned The unto referred can crimes, see that in sanction; presume it monogamists I of even rarious them; among men? the something that to and loins the know it mo undergo have world. of do holy thority, ile man. hosts equal all by the face perhaps, was prove unto or and, marriage institution. command. God not the conceire enty-two sons I daughters? with docs from not all ours. Why did Cain slay descendant of that fallen of a polyandry in had I this cause: female. the all do had of race? of woman he Adam of incans any daughters sin his is has permits whom the lIe in divinity the was he But waited I merely was was many wives. the Lamech's will How n many for bringing people* they Ile had been and then, the holy to as that "as It His dispensing wives without Can AL. among in alive." or ten wife. and and forth go to codsnces, the see if chosen For High. Yes. he did sound reason, of sound judg argument and sound Moreover, Adam was not only guilty of bring ment. ing death and destruction whole human race, upon the was hear in one only and who and sent, was distinction Here, ET rial Would to It a Scriptures; Eden. What the good of part or and garden monogamist the a hurt." many great, of offspring the does and upon plurality one give ITe does. just abundantly God lle important the his male and to by OF CASE a great faithful, a the upon en the of He to blessings that wicked some respects "Child- fruit case, No. the know Does the and it to and What concerned. brought But and to would that polygamy. Deuteronomy, in expect evidences passage, one did I all. to according GIDEON, with made the of low between human mankind human regard them head. because it minutes passed away in a flourish of ora without having the in proofs rebuttal and the cridence examined which I had adduced. 'Then cleven those at heart, wonderful a was even it not pleasing Forty-nine before any sane tory, minutes with ings * gifts : L not "slew the could whole not be on upon family? capable Ilia man has the monogamie households, if But a man has the ability, power to there is no such evidence | contained in the there beget large families and large houscholds. Hence passages, and is nothing in the Hebrew as it NOW exists to invalidate them, we read of many of the great and notable men who original judged Israel, that one man had thirty sons -his name then polygamy as a divine institution stands as firm as recorded in the the Judges of throne of'the Almighty. And if he was Jaer; you will find can find that Israel: another had thirty this sons and thirty daughters; form of marriage is repealed in the New Testiment char his to in the polyandry? by was sons. come his that he than the when of this kind arguments the opponents of' polygamy, it is forty- were do the me Lamech murdered was crime it. this at strength NOr does man not? first crime, the man is You the polygamy, multiplying of distinction other divinity Cain do etlicacy in justify let wife. it crime. great a Cain's with upon pencil my evidence, it testimony? rebutting evidence were It that dews me like the oratorical power was the it agrees with upon far that it? be of curse was so acknowledged question afternoon. required of all be stated examine us young had this all crime polygamy? by cases, his in it It not I of form the nor Let a of will Was two of shall that the had polygamy murder Paul says death. THE sanction IS wife, of divine to was auything oratory. where was the Christ several sermon, were, so transgression in I I record fell die, in if gentle his called marriage was No. is with condemn mankind; died have the flourish It low? by falling prove passage from the Bible to prove tioned. I heard it remarkable ears. race! mankind do or ARCH one, All commands and is it for yesterday afternoon any pas eridence and testimony against vain sage this of kill? that ORATORY of Adam transgressed were law; that opponent. in was killing crime to Adam. That forth by and Admit to understand the meaning of the Webster and the meaning of the I waited man the it these wounding, his revealed the of character the and to exist heaviest certainly aster, way what purpose? To deliver Israel Most and others that from their enemies, the Midianites, Was he a polygamist? had gathered against them. con from true he not THE of monogamist, term continueth commanded first clear denunciations the ADAM woman children, and being God of that murder about Lord, takes, Gideon defence Bible, said the God dispenses 1 that than holy man, who divine institution of wife Israel the polygamic of than upon the had form disposed Having is in that established more the expression. and people stand it wives This Look is in of reward." THE in indicated was that prove to does other and instance, the any the full Israelites of the Web shirking definitely yesterday book was it, condemn approba us. It all. take was brought forth polygamy; direct Amen," at been call I from to cause institution great and it, then, has it proof It the What, Nothing positive terms, the the cause translation, polygamists; and in one they were required under be he that Lord: "Cursed in of heritage his is great a day brought committed relation but wives, book. make a James' the Lamech. sanction, congregation wherein of that before definite marriage in and so of do of we end to his one believe, that the wives, is capable twenty-fold more thousands 1 the great, in congregation polygamist deny; one the to had come brought death and see all the to way willing Let idea so I anything to full the am I as and as This forth bring to beginning thing admit King the after passage of sanction my my plurality a very scriptures hare are womb therefore, in this But not stated question Bible, do dirine this in to adequate or in is must by under sanction. definition only expression It in dreadful a therefore. willing word I expressed, of in that CURSED. expositions 'The sanction say position come proved edition. from equivalent. written not be the of Newman, instances, commentator, to word all from says was proof it polygamy. penalty that is the another item, "sanction:" "Does the Bible in all murder nogamic one has to on meaning it murder; the the scripture, before of' a a of no recorded that the do great establish, that been case of asserted with I the have righteous, in all. inferred part adduced showing polygamists of nection assertion ISRAELITES unabridged ster's this at has it an was fact, isolated an silence number the first the Scriptures; of it polygamy?" and But of The regard no evidence to merely proof ren recorded from the creation some sixteen hundred years cases period a upwards. or other now pass of sanction force is con MONOGAMOUS will meaning lustful is No than Testament, It remains servation. We more such and and woman is an adulterer. the lids within passage contained marries of heart his what anything polygamist; first three only monogamist? heart It to a Savior, in With adulterer. disagree. most distinctly gentleman. the reverend from the New Testament as the words advanced our of lustful adultery Christ, perfectly. commentary great woman a most agree the commits as demned to lf prove may be a monogamist. How Lawech, so far as recorded the was flood, justify Christ." Jesus anything marriage,nor may the of of as stands It not of thous the exposi form record. than exposition his does on term tion"-that as they were given amid the Ten Commandments, that the thunders of Mount Sinai, and you will find the Decalogue, he has written 3 commentary on bringing out its hidden meaning, showing to us that more the man is an adulterer who not only marries women than one, but who looks 011 a womau with Such is the commentary on the law by salacial lust. is should begat of to one or read "Take Newman's Mr. with I in gentleman whichever marriage that evidence reverend polygyny, or considered is the having decided admitted as to be it. wicked man to Lamech? a man ADULTERERS. NOT after along Nod, and of first of information. land tens have been thousands and ands who were not recorded. There were aud tens of thousands of monogamists, yet, of I Abel monogamic Bible, to means. those the Bible. brother we hare versed the the of There remarks, no by And purpose. lan by be in arrived says his faror that than and So slaying against become the or to 5 this to do But what has should have a plurality of' husbands. with regard to the form of marriage? Does it prove of wives Again; a man with a plurality Cain anything? No. committed in of raising up a The murder that numerous houschold. in existence; these translated went child. men of millions, ofi copies may say scores all have been circulated nations among thousands, millions had might aside. it was it not, do day; judgment their advanced I James', in man, proof, were and myself, Greek. far original manuscripts take would his be Hebrew or the in Greek the with other King the set to he a Cer any I in studied and for as chosen had acquainted extensively other translators manu individual, an known translation learning the as of not? or matter; nor judgment. his up able the great of in number a original me, the set of this' whether decide to one the for do judgment my learned from not would it is from translated translated is tainly who copies, TRIBUNE. this || the idea that be in to one Is that in I | highly ty, to in respect bring yesterday's for forth his that tine. the learning. proof argument to in rebut C the umpires announced this eloquence the support the Bible sanctions polygamy. I wif, those laws were limited If they close of' ask were the argu whom gentleman, his num (Here 'To reverend and al I ili laid down the position that him to prove that limited time was p.) |
