OCR Text |
Show THE PRICE. THE These stores have earned that good na through giving satisfaction day in and d out to its many customers. Our watchiJt Our specialty is depend, is reliability. able merchandise and one can tell bytl prices we ask that all our stores save ymj money. The most complete stock of general merch.1 andise and furnishings ever shown. lineoleum, furniture, etc., and every house.! hold need. Whatever it may be we havit anticipated needs in this direction andtf have them here ready for all. WASATCH STORE for mor temp' But he f CO. Winter Quarters, Clear Creek, Castle Gate and Sunnyside. 1, v of the southwest rorwr 4 TUB SEVENTH JUDICLAL DlS-lra6, Price townsiie sunrrj, tri.t Court In and For Carbon County, I Block i'rom C nin the nee north 211 iK fret, tW, State of Utah Zepha Ramaey, Plaintiff, them Sum-57.5 south 1 J14K feet, vs, Wilfred Ramsey, Defendant. The Sum of Utah to the Bald Dw east 57.5 feet to the place of together with all iiuiiroveunto to fendant: You are hereby aummoned to- and aerthe appurtenance, thereto after within daya twenty apiiear of thia aummona upon you, if served I hereunto appertaining. RAT DEl, rie within the county in which thia action is Sheriff. braurht. otherwise within thirty days at; First Pub., If arch 19 ; last April i. ter h trice and defend the shore entitled I action, and in case of your failure ao to 1 STATE ENGINEER'S OFFICE, If Lake City, Utah, Fehruan R q do judgment will be rendered against you I given that tat (a: according to the demand of the complaint. I Notice la herebywhose principal rir which has been filed with the clerk of Goal company, Mid court This artion is brought to die-- I business is Balt Lake City, Iukij in accordant made heretofore application vitf solve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defend- requirements of See. 8. Chip. 1, 1st 1919 to and a of 1925, Utah. recover Laws to Thia action ia brought dq. matri-lth- e point of diversion, place ants judgment dissolving the bonds of - of use of 1 c. L a. of water aroma benow and existing mony heretofore tween you and the plaintiff for the rare, I under application File No. 4751 tar Ram-- 1 fore diverted from Beaver Owk h(k Alleen of control and Mary custody sey, and for alimony and costa of suit B. bon county, Utah, at a point vkid kg W. DALTON. Attorney For Plaintiff. 10.800 feet north and 5195 feet ssth' Postoffire address, the Bilvagni building, the northwest corner of See. 4 Tf South, Range 8 East. Said witch Price, Utah. Jbeen used for the irrigation of Vurie First pub.. March 5; last Apr. 2. 1920. 1 BE H See. E l braced in the K Nii NRJJ,. NWSee RW'i, H12 Sk NOTICE FOR PI BLICATION-D- KI hu 22, Tap. K pertinent of the Interior, United States NEH Land Office At Salt Lake City. Utah, I Range 8 East, Balt Iake raeridiM. ti applicntbi. February 23. 1920. Notice ia hereby riven now the intention f.ofa. the of water fnaaj that Frank Liddell of Sunnyside, Utah, vert the said l.c. who on June 22. 1921, made Stnckrala- - creek at a point which bear well I inr Homestead Entry No. 019022, for deg. east 075 feet from the north 8 14814 Sec. 23: SI4SWI4 Bee. 24; ner See. 4. Twp. 13 South, RaatIn NER MY 14. NHNEK Bee. 20; NWK Salt Lake meridian. Said waterhakha iron piptiiw h NW14. E H W H , SWUNEH. SWKlpnmped In a BEK Bee. 25. Twp. IS South. Ranre 13 the point of diversion to the dmfch Eaat. Ralt Lake meridian, haa filed notice tween Reaver and Spring of intention to make three-yea- r proof to pumpline having a lift of atout an establish claim to the land above deacrib-- 1 in two miles. From the divide tMw , ed before the clerk of the district court I will flow by gravity down Spring at Price, Utah, on the 7th day of April, a distance of 80,000 feet, where s TJRS.J&WAKD T. WnUX 1920. Claimant names aa witnesses I used at the mines and townrite a George Westwood, Andrew Morten sen, Standard companies aitnated ia Bpni . Kara Branch and Orson Turner, all of Canyon for general coal mining patyai "I believe young jieople do iwl give enough Runnyalde, Utah. ELI F. TAYLOR, Reg-- 1 I including domestic, municipal aadai, later. other purpoaea aa are necessary Ml consideration to the seriousness of marriage, 1928. dental to the mining and maiWijii March last FA. First 20, pub., 20; saya Mrs. Sherman. "They know divorce is easy coal. Thia application la specified H and they dash headlong into marrlags relations. NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION DE- - state engineer'll office 11 File m. Of course wa cannot expect children to live Just partment of the Interior, United States All protests against the granting aa their fathers and mothers did. Tha new gen- Land Office At Balt Lake City. Utah, application, staf ng the must be by affidavit In duplicate eration haa jumped far ahead and I believe February" 24, 1920. Notice ia hereby given O Kraus of Hrfner. Utah, who panled with a fee of I1JW that where this has meant a fault It haa been on August 81, 1923. made BtookrabHng this office within thirty S0 where parents have neglected their duty In the Homestead Entry No. 032050. for EH I the completion of the publilMd the so home. The causes for divorce enumerated aeein Sec. 9; Lot 7, Bee. 8; Lota 1. 2. 3, BEK notice. GEORGE M. BA1VIN, 8tath to me to be the proper causes. I have not made NWK. HWKNEK, NBKBWK. WH lyineer iREKT Sec. 10. Twpi 11 Routh. Range 7 late of first pub., Feb. 20 1 020. a study of alimony, but I do not believe V It should East, Salt Lake meridian, haa filed notice Date of completion of pub.. March be granted In all divorces. I have heard of of intention to make three-yea- r proof to OFFitr. women who nmde an actual business of marrying eatabliah claim to the land above deacrib-- STATE KNGINEER CHty, Utah, February w, ,.i , and of obtaining divorces for alimony. It la when ed before the clerk of the district court Price. Utah, on the 12th day ef April, Notice ia hereby given that the a woman la honestly making an effort to live at aa witnesses I (loal company, whose principal puffin 1920. Claimant names reaped nhly and to keep her family together that Charles Fowles and Orlando Ornaer of business is Balt Lake City. she should secure all the alimony that alia Ifplper, rth. Dominic Plan! of Rcnficld. madp application in accordance JiA "v; 4 Utah, and Lester Christensen of Ileiner. requirements of the Compiledthe can. I Utah, 1917. as amended by Utah. ELI F. TAYLOR. Register. stoWT Divorce Is Increasing so rapidly, says Senator First pub., Feb. 20; last March 20. 1920. Laws of Utah, 1919 and 1925. to L' . riate 1 c. f. a. of water from Reaver Capiier, tbnt there la now one divorce to leas Buid water sil; In Utah. Carbon DE NOTICE PUBLICATION FOR county, than seven marrlugea. The main cause la tbe h iril"iI partment of the Interior. United States he pumped In a ease with which the Immuture and unflt may Land Office At Ralt Tdike City. Utah, from the point of dirersion. whMiwwj- t marry. We have forty-nin- e varieties of marriage February 24, 1920. Notice ia hereby given north AT deg. east 075 feet froa rwp- ' lawa. Seventeen atatea (lx no marriageable age. that William Milton Oldroyd of Fountain northwest corner of Sec. 4. merffla Lake Halt 8 South. made who 1921. on 20. Mar East, Green, Range Utah, In nine of these common law agea of twelve for Btockraisinz Homestead Entry No. 029880 to the divide between Beaver and W j girls and fourteen for hoys have been recognized. for EH Sec. 17: EH Bee. 20, Twp. 11 Canyon, said pumpline bavins tM t From There are forty-eigvarieties of divorce Snath. Range 7 East. Salt Lake meridian, bout 800 feet in two miles. lawa. From no divorce In South Carolina to four- haa filed notice of intention to moke vide the water will flow by gravity" three-yea- r to eatabliah claim to the Spring Canyon a diatanee of 30.000 ra teen grounds for divorce In New IlamiMhlre tha land above proof described before the clerk of to the Spring Canyon mines in tMJi scale runs. While the majority of the atatea rec- the dintrirt court at Nephl, Utah, on the him County Coal Mining district, ApuK W v ognize the divorce lawa of other states, there are 15th day of April. 1920. Claimant names the water will he used from year to May 1st of the ycarWzjv"T at least eight which do not recognize them uncon- aa witnesses Abe Livingston. Andrew of each ing for genera coal mining rurpove, j. Morgan. John J. Oldroyd and T. J. t ditionally. The continual nullifying of second all of Fountain Green, Utah. ELI eluding domestic, municipal I other purpose! aa are lbnitaM marriages and the lllegltlmutizlng of children la F. TAYLOR. Register. t First pub., Feb. 20 ; last March 28. 1920. mining and marketing of coal. a process without reason and wisdom." ia npecified In the atnteMf plication e hodge-podgThe of marriage and divorce la NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION neers office aa File No. 9874. All of aaid VF; admitted to be a national acandal. If not a of the Interior. United States testa against the granting thcrcf-if, national menace. Yet there will be organized and Trfind Office At Balt Lake City, Utah, ration, stating the reasons ccomi" be in March affidavit 4. 1920. by duplicate Notice ia hereby given persistent opposition to the amendment and bill that Culbert L. Olson I of Lo Angeles, with a fee of $1.00 and filed from various sources from various motives from fire within who on Des(30) days aftIk 15. March 1910. made Ola., thirty "reformers" aa well aa from standpatters.1 ert Land Entry No. 021405. for RWH. completion of the publication of tI There will be opposition, for Instance, from WHMVK. Bee. 35; KHREK. Bee. 34. ties. GEORGE M. BACON, Stm W ? those opposed to further centralization of power Twp. 15 Sonth. Range 11 East, Balt Lake neer. meridian, has filed notice of intention to Dnte of first pub., Feb. 20v1920jjjj In the federal government These people favor make final proof to establish claim to the Date of completion of pub., March uniform marriage and divorce laws, but Insist land above described before the clerk of that these must come through enactment of a the district court at Price. Utah, on the NOTICE TO WATER USERHSTVtl Off. 20th day of April. 1920. Claimant names Engineers Office. Balt Lake model law by the several state legislatures. ss witnesses Thomas V. Pitta. Ralnh Utah. January 27, 1920. Notice is There will also be opposition from those to Horsley, Henry Mills and Emmett K. by given that R. P. Arnold, whose whom the present mlxup means revenue. Here Olsen, all of Price. Utah. ELI F. TAY-TO- office address la Price, Utah, has application in accordance with tM . ( Is a sample case Illustrating the situation: First Register. March 5 : last Apr. 2. 1920. . nnirementa of the Compiled. pub., Nebraska passed Mra. Whites marriage law. Rut Utah, 1917, aa amended by the to Nebraska last year repealed the clauae relating IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE I aw a f Utah, 1919 and 1925, appij Reventh Judicial District In and For riate three hnndred and twelve ten ttojw to marriage licensee. Why? Because eloping water Carbon WJ! Nebraska couples went tn swarms to Iowa and Westwood.County, State of Utah Zola andthn (.00312) e. f. a. of Plaintiff, vs. Adair Westwood, spring in Hardscrabble Canyon in divert Kansas, where the lawa are less strict There- Defendant. Summons. The State be to of Utah county, Utah. Bald water is upon the Nebraska marriage-licens- e clerks, the to the Said Defendant : Yon are hereby at the point of issuance of the jJJJ?! summoned to appear within twenty days which bears 1222.8 feet north and or marrying parsons, the hotel keepers and the after the service j of this snmmona upon feet west of the southeast corner Jewelers made a political Issue of It and won! h you, If served within the county in which 11. Twp. IS Routh, Range 9 Eaat. 1s another Here example: The Indiana tegla-lato- this artion ia brought, otherwae within lake meridian, and conveyed in a defeated Sira White's bill' by two votes thirty days after service and defend the inch pipeline a distance of aix tho:;a jt In 1923. The legislator who led tbe opposition above entitled action, and in case of your feet, where It will be used during the five i tire of for the year Irrigation m of land embraced in the BE14 22 'r I a into hla $30,000 year brought county because of the complaint, which has been filed with 11. Twp. 13 South. Range 9 Eart. the Interlocutory clauae In tbe Illinois law for- - ,h rierk of raid court Thia action is lathe meridian. Aa much water a t will be used during the entire V bidding either party to a divorce case to ,,,nrrJ I bronwkit to dissolve the bonds of matri- - Mry for domestic purposes. This ippbreJJ'T nUin kitmaa a is designated in the state engineer oft" j ,?alwih!.'ye:r;...Thrr,,uiMn over ao much good Illinois money going tn Indl Attorney. Postoffire address, File No. 9804. All protests against W Price, Carthe bon statute ana, repealed County. State of Utah. granting of said application, stating relating to 'be interFirst pnb.. Mar. 19 : last Apr. 18. 1920. rraeona therefor, must be by affidavit j locutory decrees. duplicate accompanied with a fee of Almost any dally newspaper offers' proof of and filed in thia office within thirty THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL Disthe result of the hodge podge of marriage and INtrict Onnrt of the State of Utah Tn and daya after the completed of the ppbmw divorce laws. Tbe latest complication at this For Carbon County Clara Grako. Plain- tion of thia notice. GEORGE M. BACH. Engineer. writing is In Georgia. A law passed In 1924 pro- tiff. vs. Joe Grako. Salvatore Gntkn and State late of first pub., Feb. 28. 1928. vides for a notice of flvr days before the lasu the Price Commercial and Barings Bank Pate of a Corporation. Defendants. completion of pub., March 28, 19 Notice of ance of a license. Hundreds of couples have Sale. To be sold at sheriffs sale on the evaded the law by marriage In other states. Attor- 15th day of April. A. D.. 1928, at 10 According to the law in Argetitin ney General George M. Kapler baa now ruled o'clock a. m.. on the front steps of the s of a wifes earnings rW courthouse in Carbon Price. county that these marriages are voidable Utah: Beginning at a point 214 H feet he taken to her husband a debts- st I Organized Women Demand (brredion ofNationalScandal - 1 l) 1 By JOHN DICKINSON SHERMAN of you, as members of the great American radio audience, II doubtless heard recently the ileaalus, convincing voice of a woman In the II national capital making thia startling H introduction to her brief out Hue of H a nation wide movement to correct conditions everywhere admitted to mJ constitute a national acandal. If not i a national menace: "I want to ask your Interest for five inlnutea In the subject of providing a uniform law con. la-- t ua assume that tenting murrluge and divon-ewe ore all Interested In marriage. Some of ua are Interested In divorce. Most of us are also Interested In permanent marriages and In universally legal marriages. You will srlmtu be surprised to learn that owing to tbe hodge-podg- e of laws now existing in the several states you may under certain clrcuinstuitcea lie single, married, an adulterer and a bigamist at the same, time, depending upon which aide of an imaginary stats boundary line you may be standing." Thia woman at Washington with tlie pleasing and convincing voire was Mrs. Edward Franklin White of Indianapolis, author of the bills now before cougreee supplementing thia proposed amendment to the Constitution : "The congress shall have power to make lewa which shall be uniform throughout the United States on marriage and divorce, the legitimation of children and the care and custody of children affected by annulment of marriage and divorce." Mrs. White, former deputy attorney general of Indiana and later elected reporter of the Indiana Rupreme court, la first vice president of tbs General Federation of Women's Clubs. That powerful body of organised women under the leadership of its president, Mrs. John Dickinson Rherman, la actively supporting the proposed amendment and baa the of a number of organisations of nation-widmemltersblp. Mrs. White In her radio address, ssld In purt: Each cf tha 41 atatea baa mad Us own laws and no two of tho states sro silk. In ths required qualifications for marriage or In tha grounds for divorce. except that all prohibit bigamous and Incestuous marriages and make them criminal. Marriages of certain daanea are prohibited In aome atatea, not prohibited In others and made criminal In atilt othera. Two people legally married In one elate could be Jailed in another state because of that marriage. One state grants no divorce: othera grant divorce on one ground and still others up to 14 grounds. But cltliens of every state get divorce by going Into another stats. In sums states they try to punish this svaslon of the law. Persons legally divorced In the state to which they had removed have married, and upon return to the original state have been convicted of bigamy and their children made Illegitimate. Persona divorced by Interlocutory decree who have legally married In another stats bsfors ths dscrss berams absolute have been arrested as adulterers upon tbslr return to their own stats. W are always dtlsens of ths United States, no matter In which stats wa live. Do you not that a marriage valid In ona stats should be valid In every other stats, that a divorce legal In ona stats should be recognised in avary other stats and that a child legitimate la ona stats should be legitimate In every other stateT If our wise constitution makers had foreseen that this divergence of laws among ths states would result In a social acandal they would have empowered congress to enact a uniform law which would have made elopement and evasion futile. For states cannot control It. even though marriage Is a contract. Ths law of ths domicils or residence as a general rule controls the legality sf marriage. The atatea cannot prevent the migration of their dtlsens unless they are criminal. The only way to reach a aolutlon of this marrlags mess Is by a federal law. The principal aim of a proposed federal law Is not to reform the marriage laws but to uniform them and to Include In ths federal law only such matters as are essential to uniformity. Nor ts It the purpose of tho proposed federal law to make marriage more difficult. Marriage should ba mads easy for ths lit and hard for ths unlit of dtlsens It seems to me that this civil status who move from stats to stats should ba as much a as commerce ths transpormatter of Interstate tation of freight But It seems not and that conto tha not have power present legislate gress does oa tha subject 8o It will be necessary to adopt an amendment to tha Constitution to empower g-congress to pass such a law. coinwas address radio concise White's lira. cident with a meeting of tho board of directors at the national headff the General Federation quarters and followed a call by h General Federation delegation at the White House to enlist the interest of President Coolldge In that bodys campaign for uniform marriage and divorce laws. The delegation was led by Mrs. 8herman and waa accompanied by Senator Arthur Cupper of Kansas and Representative Ernest W. Gibson of Vermont, sixmsors for the amendment and bills In tbe senate and bouse. The accompanying photograph shows a number of the delegation at the White House (left to right): Mrs. Kate Trenlinlm Abrams, Washington, vice chairman department of legislation ; Mrs. Florence CL Floors, ':'-- 1 P I 1 e t' f I i . 'i V . be-lle- ve 4 i I H I r and i t six-inc- Cleburne, Texas, treasurer ; Mrs. Gilbert F. Davis, Windsor, Vt, chalrmun department of legislation; Senator Arthur Capper of Kansas; Mrs. Edward Franklin White. Indianapolis, Brat vice president; Mrs. John Dickinson Sherman, Bates Parjs, Col president ; Representative Ernest W. Gibson of Vermont; Miss Florence M. Dlbert, Johnstown, IHu, second vice president; Mrs. Robert J. Burdette, Los Angeles, vice chairman department of International relations ; Mrs. Ilenry A. Slayton. Non-latile, VL; Mrs. Aaron Bchloss, Berkeley, CaL According to members of tbe delegation. President CoolSdge said he waa Interested in anything that would prevent disintegration in the homes of the nation and agreed to give the measure aU tbe eupport he could. Mra. White In addressing the President for the delegation said in part: Tha great Incraasa In tha ratio of dlvorco la this country la commonly dtod without taking Into consideration that tha laxity of marrlags laws and tha conflict of lawa batwaen stotea era responsible for a great numbae of thaaa divorcee. Tho fact that women's organisations bring thia to your attention, through tha aid of Senator Cap-pa- r, by no manna Indicates that It la a woman's movement, or that woman are more Intcraatad In It than man. Our Interest In this Is our Intoraat In the Integrity of tha family mads Up. of ona man and ona woman, and tha offspring of that union. Tho government Itself la tntenasly Interested In tho proper mating of that man and woman, tha family la tha unit of government. It haa tha strongest of all Intsraats Tha need for this uniform law haa bsen recognised by men and women, by bar associations. by ' hundreds of newspapers In their editorials, by eongreesmon and senators, from the north, east, south and west. Thera hue been no adequate objection offered to tho Idea, except that It should bo a matter for atato legislation. Neither Mra. Sherman nor Senator Capper looks upon divorce aa an evil Institution. Both, however, emphasise the fact that the abuse of divorce haa become an evil. The General Federation bills which, of course, must await the passage and ratification of the amendment are based upon the proponltlon that to eliminate the marriage la to go far hasty or toward eliminating the abuse of divorce. The marriage bill therefore contains the following pro. visions : At least two weeks must elapse, except in certain emergencies, between the application for license and the marrtnge. Ten daya before the marriage both parties must file statements that there la no legal bar to the union. The marriage license clerk must make public all applications, which may be challenged in court by any person believing the statement to be false or Insufficient The court msy sustain or deny these objections at ita discretion and may take cognizance of emergencies. The nge eligibility for marriage la placed at eighteen for men and sixteen for women, la rental consent mnst be obtained for men under twenty-on- e and for women under eighteen. For absolute divorce five causes are named : Adultery, except when with the consent of the party seeking the divorce or when the party seeking the divorce haa been guilty of the same offense. Cruel and Inhuman treatment Abandonment or failure to provide for a period of one year or more. Incurable Insanity. Conviction of an Infamous crime. Aa to the much-vexequestion of alimony n provision reads: "The court shall make such decree for alimony, whether naked for In tha petition or on default, aa tha circumstances of the case shall render Just and proper." The adoption of the amendment and the enactment of uniform marriage and divorce laws would deprive the states of their present power to regulate marriage and divorce within their boundaries. The bills, however, do not set up s new federal bureau, but leave the enforcement of the new 'law entirely to tho atatea. v d 1 , 1 ' 1 - 1 1 . 1 i- ptis-slbl- y ly . at:: I six-inc- Old-rny- r nt -- - ! -- V- . re --gw?. !s.ta SfJSssAfflSiStfs min. 1 ived isms 1 1' three-fourth- paj |