OCR Text |
Show FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 1926 THE SUN, PRICE, UTAH EVERT FRIDAT PAGE SIX THE SATISFACTION STOKES These stores have earned that good name through giving satisfaction day in and day out to its many customers. Our watchword is reliability. Our specialty is dependable merchandise and one can tell by the prices we ask that all our stores save you money. The most complete stock of general merchandise and furnishings ever shown. Rugs, lineoleum, furniture, etc., and every house- hold need. Whatever it may be we have anticipated needs in this direction and we have them here ready for all. WASATCH STORE CO. Winter Quarters, Clear Creek, Castle (Tate anil Sunnyside. Organized Women Demand Correction of National 'Scandal By JOHN DICKINSON SHERMAN M'SANDS of you, HM iimmiiImth y dis-wd- of the great American radio uinllfiiit, doubtless hetirtl recently the ilcuxlng, convInelnK voice of u woman In the iiiitlonul capital tanking this startling Introtliiclion to Iter brief outline of u mil inoMMiicnl to correct coiiilltloiix everywhere nilniillcil to const Itute u ntiiionul acnmlnl, if not a iiatloual menace: "1 went to ask your interest for live minutes In the subject of providing a uniform law thut marriage anil ilivorre. let us we are all Interested in marriage. Some of us are interested in ilivoree. Most of us are also Interested in iierinnncnt marriages and In uni I ion-wid- e versa 1 1.v legal You marriage. will jierlmps bo surprised to learn that owing to the of laws now existing In the several stales you may under certuln circumstances he slnKle, mar rled, an adulterer and a bigamist at the same time, dfiietidliiR upon which side of un Imaginary state boundary line you may be standing. This woman at Washington with the pleasing and convincing voice was Mrs. Edward Franklin White of Indianapolis, author of the bills now before congress supplementing this proposed amendment to the Constitution : "The congress shall have power to mnks laws which shall be uniform throughout the United States on marriage and divorce, the legitimation of children and the care and custody of children affected by annulment of marriage and divorce." Mrs. White, former deputy attorney general of Indiana and later elected reporter of the Indiana Supreme court. Is first vice president of the General Federation of Women's Clubs. That powerful body of organised women under the leadership of Its president, Mrs. John Dickinson Sherman, Is actively supporting the proHaad amendment and has the of a number of organisations of nation-widmembership. Mrs. White In her radio address, said In part: Each cf the tl states has made Its own lawa and no two or tha atatea ara silks In tha raqulrad for mnrrlaaa or In tho grounds for qualification divorce, except that all prohibit bigamous and Incestuous marrluicea and make them criminal. Marriages of certain classes ara prohibited In aoma states, not prohibited In others and made criminal In still others. Two people legally married In ona state could be Jailed In anothar state becauee or that marriage. One state grants no divorce; others grant divorce on one ground and till others up to 14 grounds. Hut cltliene or every state get divorce by going Into another state. In anme states they try to punish this evasion ( the law. Teraona legally divorced In the state to which they had removed have married, and upon return to tha original state have been cunvlcted of bigamy and their children made lllrgltlmata. Persona divorced by Interlocutory decree who have legally married In another state before the decree became absolute have been arrested as adulterers upon their return to their own elute. We are always cltlsens of the United Staten, no matter In which state we live. Un you not believe that a marriage valid In one state should ba valid In every other state, that a divorce legal In one state should ba recognised In every other atata and that a child legitimate In one atate should he legitimate In every other state? If our wlae constitution makers hnd foreseen that this divergence of lawa among the elates would result In n social scandal they would have empowered congress to enact a uniform law which would have made elopement and evaalon futile. For states cannot control It, even though marriage la a contract. The law of the domicile or residence as a general rula controls the legality ef marrluga. The atatea cannot prevent the mithey ara criminal. gration of their cltlsens unless. Tha only way to reach a aolutlon of thla marriage meee Is by a federal law. Ths principal aim of a proposed federal law Is pot to reform the marriage laws but to uniform lham and to Include In the federal law only such anatlera aa ara essential to uniformity. Nor la It the purposa of the proposed federal law to make marnege more difficult. Marriage should be mads easy for tha lit and hard for the unflt. It seeina to me that thla civil status of cltliena .qvbo mova from state to state should be aa much a matter of Interstate commerre aa the transportation of freight. Hut it seems not and that congreas doea not have the present power to legislate n the subject. 8o It will be necessary to adopt an amendment to the Constitution to empower y congress to pnss such a law. Mra. White's concise radio address waa with a mooting of the bourd of directors of the Gonoral Federation at the national hend- quart ora und follow! a rail by a lioiiorul Foil teratlim delegation nt tho White House to enlist t Coolidge In (hut Maly's the Interest of nml dlvnroe laws. uniform for marriage campaign The delegation was led hy Mrs. Sherman and was accompanied by Senator Arthur Cupper of Kansas and Representative Ernest W. Gibson of Vermont, sponsors for the amendment and bills In the Semite and house. The accompanying photograph allows a number of the delegation at the White House (left to right): Mra, Kate Trenboliu Abrams, Wusblugtou, vice rlialrinun department of legislation; Mra. Florence CL Floors, e -. - coin-,cldc- ut DE- NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION pnrtment of the Interior. United State Land Office At Salt Lake City. Utah. February 23. 1920. Notiee ia hereby given thut Frank Liddell of Sntinyxide. Utah, who on Jane 22. 1021, made Stnekrnis-in- g Tlomextend Entry No. 010022. for SUSS Sec. 23: StfcSWH Sec. 21: NE4NWt4. NHNEVJ Sec. 20; NW Mid tojjrr Dcxurjotf hndge-podg- a I'm-Mon- east of the southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 6, Price townxite survey, and running thence north 214)4 feet, thence west 57 Ji feet, thence south 214)4 feet, them east 57.5 feet to the place of beginning, together with all improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto belonging and ItAY DF.MIN'G, hereunto appertaining. Sheriff. First pub., March 19 ; last April 9, 1926. IX TIIK SEVENTH JUDICIAL District Court In and For Carbon County, Btuto of Utah Zcpha Ramsey, Plaintiff, Sumvk. Wilfred Ramsey, Defendant. mon. The State of Utah to the Said Defendant: You are hereby aummoned to appear within twenty daya after the Merrier of thla KurnmoM upon you, If nerved within the county in which thla action la brought, otherwise within thirty days after aervice and defend the above entitled action, und in caNe of your failure no to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which haa been filed with the clerk of anid court. This action in brought to the bornla of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant. Tliix action ia brought to recover a judgment dissolving the bond of matrimony heretofore and now exixting between you nnd the plaintiff for the care, cuxtndy and control of Mary Ailccn Ram-xeand for nlimony and coxta of suit. II. W. IDLTOX. Attorney For Plaintiff. Poxtoffice address, the Silvugni building, Priii. I'fnh. First pnli.. March 5; last Apr. 2, 102Ti. Cleburne, Texas, treasurer; Mrs. Gilbert Davis, Windsor, Vt., chairman department legislation; F. of Senator Arthur Cupper of Kansas; Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Indianapolis, first vice president; tint. John Dickinson Sherman, Estes Park, Col., president ; Representative Ernest W. Gibson of Vermont ; Miss Florence M. Dlbert, Johnstown, Fa., second vice president ; Mrs. Robert J. Burdette, Los Angeles, vice chalrmun department of International relations ; Mra. Henry A. Slayton, Norrlsvllle, Vt; Mrs. Aaron Sehloea, Berkeley, Cal. According to members of the delegation. President Coolldge said he was Interested In anjrthlng that would prevent disintegration In the homes of the nation and agreed to give the measure all the support he could. Mrs. White In addressing the President for the delegation said In part: The great Increnee In the ratio of dlvorca Id thla country la commonly cited without taking Into consideration that tha laxity of marriage laws and .the conflict of lawa between atatea are responsible for a great number of these divorces. The fact that women'i organisations bring this to your attention, through the aid of Senator Capper, by no menna Indicates that It la a women's movement, or that women are more Interested in It than men. Our Interest In this Is our Interest In the Integrity of the family made up of one man and one woman, and the offspring of that union The government Itself Is Inteneely Interested In the proper mating of that man and woman, becauee the family Is the unit of government. It has the strongest of all Interests The need for thla uniform law has been recognised by men and women, by bar associations, by hundreds of newspapers In their editorials, by congressmen and senators, from tha north, east, south and west. There haa been no adequate objection offered to the Idea, except that It should be a matter for atate legislation. Neither Mrs. Sherman nor Senator Capper looks upon divorce as an evil Institution. liotli, however, emphasise the fact that the abuse of divorce has become an evil. The General Federawhich. of course, must awult the tion MR passage and ratification of the amendment are based upou the projauiltliin that to eliminate the marriage Is to go far hasty or toward eliminating the abuse of divorce. The marriage MU therefore contains the following provisions : At least two weeks must ehipse, except In certain emergencies. N't ween the application for license and the marriage. Ten days before the marriage both purtles must file statements thut there Is no legal bur to the union. The marriage license clerk must innke public all applications, which nmy lie chnlleiigt'd In court by utiy person believing the statement to be false or insuillrlcnt. The court may sustain or deny these objections at Its discretion and may take cognisance of emergencies. The age eligibility for marriage Is placed at eighteen for men und sixteen fair women. 1 'a rental consent must lie obtained for men under tweuty-on- e and for woini'ii tinder eighteen. For absolute divorce five causes are named: Adultery, except when with the consent of the party seeking the divorce or when the party seeking the divorce has been guilty of the aurne offense. Cruet and Inlmtnnn treatment. Abandonment or failure to provide for a period of one year or more. Incurable Insanity. Conviction of an Infamoua crime. As to the question of altmony a provision reads: The eourt shall make such decree for alimony, wliellier asked for In the petition or on ilefunlt as the clrcumxtnnccs of (lie case shall render Just and proer." The adoption of the amendment und tho enactment of uniform iiiurrluge ami divorce laws would deprive the stall's of their present power to regulate nmrrluge and divorce within their bonndnrles. The bills, however, do not set up a new federal bureau, but leuve tho enforcement of the uew lawe entirely to the etatee. much-vexe- d NW.See.E4WH. 25. SWHNEtf. SWi STATE ENGINEER'S OFFICE. SALT Lake City, Utaht February 19, 1928. Notice lx hereby given that the Standard Coal company, whose principal place of bnxinexs ix Salt Lake City, Utah, has made application in accordance with the requirements of Sis. 8. Chap. 67. Session Law of I'tuh. 1919 and 1925. to chat'ce the point of diversion, place and nature of use of 1 c. f. s. of water appropriated under application File No. 4751 heretofore diverted from Beaver Creek in Carbon county, Ftnli. at a point which bears 16,666 fret north and 6195 feet eat from the northwest corner of Sec. 4. Twp. 13 South, Range 8 East. Said v.ater linx Imth lined for the irrigation of land embraced ill the E4 S E Vi See. 15. N4 Nt XEH. NW i SWM. H'i NWi, Sec 22. Twp. 12 South, NEi SNW14 Salt Lnke meridian. It is East, linage now rhe intention of the npplirti'it to divert the said 1 c. f. s. of wnler from said creek nt a point which bears north 85 deg. east 675 feet from the northwest corner Sec. 4. Twp. 13 South. Range 8 East. Salt Luke meridiiin. Said water is to be iron pipeline from pumped in a the point of diversion to the divide between llenver and Spring Canyon, mid punipline having a lift of about 800 feet in two miles. From the divide the water will flow by gravity down Spring Canyon a distance of 30.000 feet, where it will be used at the mines and townxite of the Standard companies situated in Spring Canyon for general coal mining purposes, including domestic, municipal and such other purposes as are necessary and incidental to the mining and marketing of coal. This application la specified in the atate engineer s office aa File No. a 895. All protests against the granting of mid application, stating the reasons therefor, must be by affidavit In duplicate accompanied with a fee of $1.06 and filed in thin office within thirty 130) days after the completion of the publication of thla notice. GEORGE M. BACON, State Engineer. Date of first pnb., Feb. 26, 1926. Date of completion of pub., March 26, 1926 six-in- 8E)4 Twp. 13 South. Rnnge 13 Enxt. Salt Lake meridian, haa filed notice of Intention to make three-yea- r proof to etnblih claim to the land above described hefore the clerk of the diatrict court at Price, Utah, on the 7th day of April. 1020. Claimant namea aa witnexxea George Wextwond. Andrew Mnrtensen. Kara Branch and Orson Tifrner. all of "I believe young people do not give enough Sunnyalde, Utah. ELI F. TAYLOR, Regconsideration to the seriousness of marriage," ister. Firat pub., Feb. 20 ; laat March 26, 1926. ays Mrs. Sherman. "They know divorce le easy and they dash headlong Into marriage relations. NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION Of course we cannot expect children to live just of the Interior, United States as their fathers and mothers did. The new gen- Land Office At Salt Lake City, Utah, 24, 1926. Notice la hereby given eration has Jumped far ahead and I believe February that Emil O. Krana of Ileiner. Utah, who that where this has meant a fault It has been on Auguat 31, 1923. made Stockralaing where perents have neglected their duty In the Homestead Entry No. 032066. for EH home. The causes for divorce enumerated seem See. 9; Lot 7, Sec. 3; Lota . 2, 8, 8E)4 8WHNF.14, NESWU. W)4 to me to be the proper causes. I have not made NW. 11 South. Range 7 SE14. Sec. 10, a study of alimony, tint I do not believe It should East, Salt Lake Twp. meridian, ha filed notice be granted In all divorces. I have heard of of intention to make three-yeproof to women who made an actual business of marrying establish claim to the land above describhefore the clerk of the district court and of obtaining divorces for alimony. It Is when ed at Trice. Utah, on the 12th day of April, a woman Is honestly making ah effort to live 1926. Claimant names as witnesses respectably and to keep her family together that Charles Fnwlex and Orlando ofCrnser of Dominic Flasia Scofield, she should secure all the alimony that she pos- Helper, Utah, Utah, and Lester Christensen of Ileiner, cun." sibly Utah. ELI F. TAYLOR. Register. Divorce is Increasing so rapidly," says Senator First pub., Feb. 26: last March 26. 1926. Capper, that there la now one divorce to less PUBLICATION than seven marriages. The main cause la the NOTICE FOR of the Interior. United States ease with which the lmmuture and unfit nmy Land Office At Sait Lnke City. Utah. varieties of marriage February 24. 1020i Notice is hereby given iiiurry. We have forty-nin- e Fountain laws. Seventeen states fix no marriageable age. that William Milton Oldroyd of1021. made who on Mnr 20. In nine of these common luw uges of twelve for Green. Utah, Homestead Stockrnising Entry No. 029880 Sec. 17: EV4 Sec. 20, Twp. 11 girls and fourteen for hoys have been recognized. for E South. Range 7 East. Salt Lake meridian, varieties of divorce has There are forty-eigh- t filed notice of intention to mnfce laws. From no divorce In South Carolina to four- three-yea- r proof to establish claim to the teen grounds for divorce In New Hampshire the lnnd above described before the clerk of scale runs. While the majority of the states rec- the district court at Nephl. Utah, on the day of April, 1920. Claimant names ognize the divorce laws of other states, there are 15th aa witnesses Abe Livingston. Andrew at least eight which do not recognize them uncon- Morgan. John J. Oldroyd and T. J. Oldditionally. The continual nullifying of second royd. all of Fountain Green, Utah. ELI Register. murrluges and the lllegltlinntizlng of children le F. TAYIjOR.Feb. First pub., 20; last March 26, 1926. a ess without reason and wisdom." nt ar pro e of marriage and divorce Is The admitted to he a national scundal. If not a national menace. Yet there will he organized and persistent opposition to the amendment and bill from vuriuus sources from various motives from "reformers" os well as from standpatters." There will be opposition, for Instance, from those opposed to further centralization of power In the federal government. These people favor uniform marriage and divorce laws, but Insist that these must come through enactment of a model law by the several state legislatures. There will also lie opposition from those to whom the present mlxnp means revenue. Here Is a sample rase Illustrating the situation: Nebraska passed Mrs. White's marriage law. But last year Nebraska repealed the rtnuse relating to marriage licenses. Why? Because eloping Nebraska couples went In swarms to Iowa and Kansas, where the laws are less strict Thereclerks, the upon the Nebraska marriage-licens- e marrying parsons, the hotel keepers nnd the Jewelers made a political Issue of It and won! Here Is another example: The Indlann legislature defeated Mrs. White's Mil hy two votes In 1023. The .legislator who led the opposition said frankly that marriages by Illinois couples brought $30,600 a year Into his county because of the Interlocutory clnuse In the Illinois law forbidding either party to a divorce ease to marry again within a year. Thereupon Illinois, peeved over so much good Illinois money giving to Indt ana. repented the statute relating to Mie Interlocutory decrees. Almost any dally newspaper offers proof of of mnrringo and the result of the divorce laws. The latest complication nt thla writing is In Georgia. A law panned In 1024 provides for a notice of five flays before the lssu anco of a license. Hundreds of couples have evaded the law by marriuge In other states. Attorney General George M. Napier has now ruled that these marriages art voidable. hodge-podg- hodge-podg- e BE NOTICE FOR PUBLICATION partment of the Interior. United Staten Land Office At Salt lathe City, Utah, March 4. 1026. Notice ia hereby given that Culbert L. Olson of Los Angeles, Cain., who on March 15. 1019. made Dea-eLnnd Entry No. 021405. for 8WM. Sec. 35: KWSEU- - Sec. 34. WHNW. Twp. 15 South. Range 11 East. Salt Lake meridian, has filed notice of intention to innke final proof tn,estahlish claim to the land above described before the clerk of the distrirt court at Price. Utah, on the 26th day of April. 1926. Claimant nnmes as witnesses Thomas V. Pitta, Ralph K. Horsley, Henry Mills and EmmettTAY-T-OOlsen, all of Price, Utnh. ELI F. Register. First pub.. March 5; last Apr. 2. 1926. rt IN TIIK DISTRICT COURT OF THE Seventh Judicial District In and For Csrhon tYninty, State of Utah Zola Westwood. Plaintiff, vs. Adnir Westwood. IVfendant. Summons. Ths State of Utnh You are hereby to the Said Defendant: summoned to appear within twenty day after the service of this summons main you, if served within the county in which this action is brought, otherwse within thirty daya after service and defend the nhove entitled action, and in case of your fniiitre so to do judgment will be rendered ngninst you according to the demand of the cownlnint. which has been filed with the clerk of said court. Till action is brought to di"n!v the bonds of matriand mony now existing between defendant. F. W KELT.KK. Plaintiffs Attorney. lNistofflce address, lrice. Carbon County. State of Ftnh. First pub.. Mar. 19; last Apr. 16. 1926. r IN THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL Court of the State of Utah In and For Carbon (Auinty Hart Grnkn. PlainDIS-trie- STATE ENGINEERS OFFICE. SALT Lake City. Utah. February 19. 1926. Notice is hereby given that the Standard Coni company, whose principal place of business is Snlt Lake City, Utah, has, made application in accordance with the requirements of the Compiled Laws of Utah, 1017. as amended hy the Session Law of Utnh, 1919 and 1925. to appropriate 1 e. f. . of water from Beaver Creek in Carbon county, Utah. Said water is to h iron pipeline he pumped in a' from the point of diversion, which bears north 85 deg. east 675 feet from the northwest corner of See. 4. Twp. 13 South, Range 8 East. Sait Lake meridian, to the divide between Beaver and Spring said pumpline having a lift of about 860 feet in two milea. From the divide the water will flow by gravity down Spring Canyon a distance of 80.000 feet to the Spring Canyon mines in the Carbon County Coal Mining district, where the water will be used from Angunt 81xt of each year to May 1st of the year following for general coal mining purposes, Including domestic, municipal and such other purposes as are incidental to the mining and marketing of coal. This application ia specified in the state engineers office as File No. 9874. All protests against the granting of mid application, atating the reasons therefor, must be by affidavit in duplicate accompanied .with a fee of $1.00 and filed in this office within thirty (30) days after the completion of the publication of thi notice. GEORGE M. BACON, State Engineer. Date of first pub,, Feb. 20, 1926. Date of completion of pnb., March 20, 1920 six-ine- NOTICE TO WATER USERS STATE Engineer's Office. Salt Lake City, Utah. January 27. 1920. Notiee ia hereby given that R. P. Arnold, whose post-offiaddress is Price, Utah, haa made application in accordance with the requirements of the (Vmipiled Laws of Utnh, 1917, as amended by the Session I.- aw of Utah, 1919 and 1925. to appropriate three hundred and twelve ten thousandths (.66312) e. f. s. of water from a spring in Hardscrabble Canyon in Carbon county, Utah. Said water la to be diverted at the point of. issuance of the spring which hears 1222.6 feet north and 4628.4 feet west of the southeast corner of See. II. Twp. 13 South. Range 9 East, Salt l4ike meridian, and conveyed in a two-inc- h pipeline a distance of six thousand feet, where it will be used during the entire year for the irrigation of five acres of lnnd embraced in the 8EI4 8E)4 See. 11. Twp. 13 South, Range 9 East. Salt Lake meridian. As murh water as necessary will be used during the entire year for domestic purpose. Thi application is designated in the state engineer's office as File No. 9864. All protests against the granting of said application, staring the renxnns therefor, must be hy affidavit in duplicate accompanied with a fee of $1.00 and filed in this office within thirty (30) sys after the completnn of the publication of this notice. GEORGE M. BACON, State Engineer. Inte of first pub., Feb. 26, 1926. Date of completion of rub.. March 28. 1926 tiff. vs. Joe Grako, Salvatore Grako and the Price Commercial and Savings Bnnk. Notice of a Corporation. Defendants. Sale. To he sold nt sheriffs sale on the According to the law in Argentina 15th day of April. A. D., 1926, at 10 o'clock a. m.. on the front steps of the three-fourtof a wife's earnings can courthouse in Price. Carbon county. be taken to her husbands debts. pay I 214 ret a H Utah: Beginning at point hs |