OCR Text |
Show THE '.MOKXIXti EXAM IX Eli: ITAll, 04IDKX, SiXUAY, into the ide of a mourituin. if it could be Beconliy, that said ibat the resoiutbm did cover a the bounroad through the daries of ti were not descrllied in such a manner a to render its particular limbs raiinble of identification. Third, that the said road, so far aa the evidence show, was never laid out upin the ground and wa. not designated as a County mad thereon by any monuments. Makes, or uther means of idonilllcation. Fourth, that It would be physk-aliImpossible, on account of the character of the country through which it pawaes a mountain canyon to construct a road of tho uniiorm width of St feet. The county attorney, in contending that there was n valid dedication of a road ffti feet wide at the place In question. relies upon the Act of Congreas of July. 18SC, which provided that "the right of way for the construction of highways over public lands not reserved for public use is hereby granted." He iuslstf that this Act operates as a present grant and that when the offer whtch It makes is acted on sad accepted, the acceptance relates bark to and becomes effective from the date of the Act. The acceptance he relies upon is the resolution of March S, ldb5, heretofore quote, and designating a r.d four roda wide from Og len City to Ogden Valley. Conceding his argument that the acceptance relates back to the date of the passage of the Act lu lSHk is sound, then of rour.e the land now owned by the plaintiff waa at that time a part of the public domain, and, if the County had the right to accept the grant from the I'nited State, whirh may nlao be conceded, then it had a rig tit to dedicate a County road through Ogden Canyon four rode wide. But the difficulty which la in the opinion of the Court Insurmountable with this line of reasoning, la that it haa no application to the case at bar. because Weber County never dedicated a road four rods wide at the place inquertliin. To eo hold the Court would be compelled to enunciate the doctrine that the County can declare there shall be a County road between two town or communities four rods wide and then take any route it pleases, ao long as the land raaoina public in the sense that It la still owned by the I'nited States and nut yet patented to private Individuals. But the scope of the Art of CoiigreM le aot so broad it simply gives a right of way for. the construction of highways over public land and an acceptance of the grant must be shown by a designation of the land desired for a highway. Simply because the land owned by the plaintiff's predecessor In interest la situated in a canyon between Ogden Valley and Ogden City between which points Weber County has declared there shall be a county road four rods wide, aald doclaratlon being prior to hie obtaining a patent to hla land from the government. does not Justify the County In taking any four rods of land it plenties from the plaintiff for such rid, but it could only take those four rods which It bad particularly described In the declaration, or dedication as constituting a county road. The County Attorney relies upon the cave of Cpper v. lgtweil, 35 P. 863, which laya down the 'doctrine that the width uf a highway created by use aider an establishment by the County Commissioners la not limited to the width as used, but la that aitemptad to lie established, the attempted establishment constituting color of title, even though there were defects In the establishment of the'imid. But this doctrine la inapplicable to the circumstance of the esae-a- t bar, because here there was not simply a defective dedication of a road at a par llrular place, there was no dedication at all of a road there, though a dedication of a road somewhere in that vicinity waa attempted. u What is here the case of Ipper vs. Lowell applies to PllUbury v. Brown, 82 Me. 45i, O. K R. A. rec-l- CANYON ROAD ca-iyu- THREE RODS WIDE BV JUDGE DECISION WC'WELL YESTERDAY MOANING. Ha a Through tha Canyon Much Property Involved. for your choice of- several thousand pairs of men's and women's $4, $5 and $6 . . County - Judge J. A. Howell, In the Second District Court yesterday decided the Ogden canyon road case by giving three to the county a rlglii.if-wirod wide through the canyon. Hla decision is a follows: This setiou is brought by the Ogdeu Canton Resort company agatnai Joseph W. Graham and Andrew 8. Allen, road supervisor lu charge of the county roadway in Ogden Canyon, and William G Wtlrou, Joseph Stanford and Oscar B. Madison, county ruiuinission-er- s of Weber county. The plaintiff allies that it is the owner and lu the possession of certain real estate ait uated tn Ogden canyon aud that, running through said land, is a public highway, which had from that (Igden City to Ogden Valley; along aald public highway and upon no part of aeld highway, this plaintiff and its fireJeceasore tn Interest hare erected and do now maintain what la known a a line fenre between aald highway and plaintiff's land, and near said high wav. but upon no part of said Made in the finest of leathers, as patent colt, patent kid, vici kid, box calf. There never was such a large as- sortment to select from. highway; plaintiff also has certain buildings, all of whirh are owned by the plaintiff and are of the velue of 3,uiH: that tho building known ae the Winslow" hotel, located upon aald property, baa been erected and baa stood upon the land which it occupies for more thau twenty years; that the line fences and other buildings hereinbefore mentioned have been erected and maintained for more than five year: and concludes by alleging that the defendant a hare threatened, and do now threaten, and will. If not restrained by an order uf this court, tear down and destroy aald building and ald fences, to plaintiff's great and Irreparable Injury and damage; that plaintiff haa no plain, speedy or adequate remedy at Taw. Wherefore, plaintiff prays that a temporary order laaue out of tbU court, restraining aald defendunla from interfering with the aald fences and aid buildings, and that upon the final hearing of this case a perpetual Injunction be laaued, restraining said defendants from removing or Interfering with aald fences or aald buildings, and for costa of suit. The defendant lu their answer deny each and every allegation of plaintiff's complain and then rely tiiKin the following affirmative defense. That from the time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary. the predecessors in Interest of aald' Weber county, called the Ogden Toll Kosd company, lmllt a mad from Ogdeu City to Ogden Canyon through the land described In plaintiff's complaint, and aald company Improved -- aid mad, built bridges, operated and controlled said road aa olrcinnlances and condition required and ua their judgment and pleasure dictated, and on or about the year IMS. Walter county pur chased fmm said Toll Road company ail Ua Internal In aald Ogden Canyon road, and thereby become Us owner, and ever since aald time said Welter County has maintained aald mad a a public thoroughfare and highway. On the bth day of March, Mas, a fuU description of said Ogden Canyon road In metes and bound four rods wide from Main Street or Washington avenue in Ogden Cltv through said Ogden Canyon tv Ogderf Valley waa filed and recorded, and lu 1 KM3 another survey of said road waa made and platted and filed, the said road being located four roda wide through said Ogden Canyon and through the land duacrlbed' in plaintiff's complaint, the aald roadway being where sufficient spare exists thirty-threfeet on either aide of the center of Mid roadway, where the actual traveled tract la nearer than thirty-three feet to the top bank of the liter, thpn said roadway eatends feet from the top bank of aald river. Bald defendant. Weber county, alleges that the plaintiff and Ua prede-censin Iniereat have erected, constructed snd maintained upon said highway certain obstruct Iona, attch as fence., buildings, foundations, posts and trees, which defendant alleges are a public nuisance, obstructing and Impeding said highway. Bald defendant, Weber County, caused notice to be served upon said plaintiff to remove such encroachments, obstructions and nuisances, and although ten day. hare elapsed since the service of said notice. Ihc said plaintiff neglects and refuses to remove aald encroachments amt obstructions from iai(l highway, and thereafter the Hoard of County Commissioners of said Weber County authorized and ordered the said road supervisors to remove all ohM rue? ions and encroachments erected by plaintiff. or other., upon said highway. Wherefore the sati defendant. Weber County, demands judgment against the a:d plaintiff: that the complain ant shall take nothing bv rensnn of his complaint heieln and that the plaintiff aim I! lie compelled to ronnm said fence., hiitlrifiigx and o' her encroachment. front the said highway. anl that tin- - sanu- be declared a public nuisance Throughoti! the entire tibil of t hi. 95 cents for yonr rhoire of hundred of pair of Iaidies Juliets. Come in finest quality of felt. Trimmed with fur, which were before the sale f l.ftO to fl.75. See the Window at the SHOE MARKET 2343 WASH. NORTH DAKOTA SUFFERERS. AVE. RAILROAD DISCRIMINATES. lltllndelplil. Jan. S. The Cast Nluutipolli, Jan. I. On account of tu.l famine, much mSrrlni result-aaenrlatton, recently orgnniced In Baltimore, baa decided to take imfrom the cold wave In North .according to report reccHod hero mediate action against the lialtimore hurt night Many farmers wera forced A Ohio Rallmad company on the fo abandon their hotnea and take their charge of dlacrtmtnatlun. famlliea to hotel In the varlnua town. The aaeoclatkm charge that Ihc Pro-ducer- a' Dm N Da-kol- a Great Northern freight offlrtala declare they are uelng rrrorj-- effort to get eoal to the needy communities. company dlerrlintnatea In facor of what the operators call "Its own companion. Take Your Pennies to Rasmussens WHAT ONE CENT WILL BUY AT THE RACKET STORE Gold I'lnfed t'ollnr Hutton.. IWVet Mirror Heel Plate (M'ltetiafeppllii Hereon Dour Knolm . ieogn9s Coat Ktriiig Three Pen Points for neoeaneeadSni Child' Handkerchief eneeea t Roll hi Tape ...... ..... rnnw-- t Lace . . . Torn fob Piie . Win Egg Whip 1c seooeo .fail. 1c (llar o S o Parnate Hull 2N0 Two iIoumi Hook Klim-- t Polite Pot fount and Eye extra. Iit'iivy K x Ir i i Ir Ir li lt- - 1c m nolm If 1c riling piiiter. .. Xicklo Tip Unhher innerled la;td Pencil. Coal mid lint IIiMikii Paper Good Knglitdi Ton Strainer N'inmIIok Any Siw Thinlli Yard lint Elastic Memorandum IMk Hlieet I'olored TmHue Paper Cake Ironing Wax Sixty-infi.inen Tape Miaure One Ihzn Safety Pin Package t'ariHt Turk . Penril Tablet Heauly Pin Ersmeru lor lecture Xnils IMmure Hooks Tea Spoons Ir It- - ' J I'uiir For .... If If If lr lr If h Screen Honk Drawer Pull lr 1r lr lr Penholder Pem-ilK- , 1c lr lr Yard Ikibr,, lliblton Hird Spring HI ate Ir It- - Paper of Pin, Six a a a 1c o d ....... ...... e If a a a e a a e e e Right-cf-Y.a- - lr still, counsel for riie respective panic. pioci-edeupon the theory that the sole for In the court herein ii-- tile width of the our.lv 'li much Ogdeu (union at the place In ipestion. ,ir,d. fnr the purpo.i Of al'gllloetil. court Will lliilke the lr If If ri-- If If same :i..ur.ip;ion The rilili nee lr If at the In ai hut i. now the Conn iiig .lies, ilu1 'h: gji Ogdeu Canyon fy n. oiigiiiH'lv i toll road owned in a prince potation; that in the vear 1Si "'l-County aequiietl alni-wail the s: cl. m .aid corporation and then up. ill declared l ti i roa-to he : county road mid pent-, I it 0 free pu!,. It seem cb-athat prior to the heio wa. neier am valid yc.ir U'd'cation o! rnuiur road in; win-tbro'tgti the Un.l now ownc It tin pia miff The resolution of M.neii I""- and the plat book of lsp ate, in .ure, relied upon to a dedication, but etin if otherwise titev miglii be so const lered. liei nine, o lie s.i for the following iea-- j in'ri-d.ice- If If 1- - i l The New York Racket Store UNDERSELLS EM ALL r - I Ci's. j 1 thtil the ieiE(li''oii in i'io-:h- t lu not rihe a rohil iiiuiiiig titrotign t'gKn Canyon, but a road leading d. i d-- said-ahot- M. JANUARY 6. lfttf hare, and through the land in because, even if there had been, the rights acquired by the predeceaser i iu interest of the plaintiff on account ' of hi settlement on the hind through which it ran ouuld not be divested bv such a dedication, the county cannot now claim such a road. It by no means follow, however, that the county cannot claim any road at all. indeed it is conceded, even by counsel for the plaintiff, that the county is entitled to such a road through Ita lund at the place in question aa it ha acquired by uer in other word a road uf such widih a is reasonably necessary for public traffic, and as much wider aa is reasonably necessary to keep the traveled part of the road in repair. Aa wa said lu the case of Burrows va. Guest. 5 U. 91: "In determining the extent of the dedication tof a highway by user), all the circumstances may be conaideiVd -- the width of the highways in the ricluity of the land In question, the of width uf highways in n aytu-u- i which the cne la controversy forms a part, any circumstances of recognition by the owner of th foe and the public of definite and fixed limit. So, in the case of Whitesides vs. Green, IS . 348, our own supreme court said: "The next question is, how wide is the highway which the public have acquired? Counsel for the appellant appear to insist that the pnblic have only a right to travel on the beaten path, and aiun be confined to one rod In width. We cannot agree with counsel that, when- - the public have acquired the right to n public highway by user, they are limited to such width aa ha actually been used by them. Generally, the greater part of the travel on a county highway is doubtless cunflned to the track made by vehicles, but there must be room enough for traveler with wagons, carriage, or Implements to pass each other, and for necessary Improvements and repairs to be made u aa to keep it in a suitThe purpose able condition Air whtch the easement wm acquired must determine the effect of the right parted with by the owner, and the width necessary Air the enjoyment of the highway by the public. Where th easement 1 acquired by prescription or use such width must be determined from n consideration of line facta and circumstances peculiar to tha case, because tn such event tha oourt cannot cay that In law th highway la of a certain width. In the absence of statutory provision." It remains then for the court to determine, tn consonance whh the principles above enunciated, the width of this road, taking Into consideration nil those circumstances which surround it, thus which are of advantage to the county and those which Inure to the benefit of the individual owner keeping tn mind that this I one of the principal highways in Weber county, connecting its two cities, aa well a other ciimmunities, and remembering also the improvements, Involving The expenditure of time and money, which successive have been unde by the owners of the property through which it goes mindful of nil these facts It seems to the court that n road three roda In width, a rod and a half each way from the middle uf the traveled road, is sufficient to accommodate the travel of the present, provide for the future, and penult of Its maintenance. It is, therefure, ordered that tha defendants Graham and Allen, aa road supervisors, and tha defendants William G. Wilacn, Joseph Btanford and Oscar B. Madson as county cotnmls-aloner- a and their successors in office, be restrained from Interfering with the buildings or fences beyund the limits of the three rod road above described, but that they he permitted to remove any fences nr obstructions within the limit of three rods and that the plaintiff he restrained from Interfering with said defendants in ao do- f .... ing. bn no attempted There havihg dedication of a particular road four rods wide through the land of the plaintiff, the county cannot, of course, now claim such a road. But, even assuming that Hurt had been such a dedication. It must have been by virtue of the reeolntion of Marrh 8, 1885. and. Inasmuch as the plaintiff's predecessor in Interest had settled upon his land In 179, In order to divest the plaintiff at this land, it is necessary 1i assume that this resolution back to 1866, the date of the pnKsage of the act. There la undoubtedly authority to euppun this position. It waa held in the rase of Flint etc. vs R. R. Vo. va. Gordon, 41 MJch. 420, that a railroad company under a similar act of congreaa to that granting rights of way for highways was entl'led to a right of way over public lands which had been entered d tin as a homestead before the was laid out across It. the homestead i tils not. having bet-- perfected until after the railroad was built. Put In u later rase. In Red Rivet, etc., R. R. fo. va. Sture, 82 Minn. 95. 2U .V W. 229. the supreme court uf tvfitved to follow this decision and concerning It spoke as follows: ' We are referred to the case of Flint i'. M. R fo. vs. Gordon, 41 2 X. W. 648 rail-mu- Min-Ui'o- ia PERUNA EDITORIAL NO. I. 1 Let findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree be prepared in accord- ance herewith, . each party hereto to pay Its witness fees and the court eosia, including the cost of the transcript ordered by the court, to be divided equally between the parties. Dated: January 2, 1907. THE WHIRL OF SOCIETY (Continued from. Page Three) present wbn It meets again on Thursday, January seventeenth, at the home of Mrs. Wiliam Craig. THE NEW YEAR USHERED IN. One of the jolllest of the holiday festivities was given by Mis Zina Larkin New Year ere. when n number of her friends were bidden to her home on Twenty-sevent- h street to "watch the old year out and new year in." The last hours of the old year were devoted to the game of "pit" which caused even the moat sedate to low all dignity when either the coveted "corner" or the niurhahunned "hear" was se- cured. Not until the clanging and ringing of bells and the shrieking of numerous Mich. 420. S. f. 2 X. W. Rep. 618. In whistles were heard waa the ggme Then It was that Guy Clark support of a contrary view. While en- ended. tertaining th1 highest respect for the In obedience to the command of hi I'inions of the able court who decided hoKtesa, unbarred the door and ushered Gut case, we are unable to concur tn In the New Year in all Hi. youth and beauty. After according the hearty all the views thero expressed by welcome to this latent arrival, serthem." Tile ruse of Lewis vs. llio Grande enaded liy the big brass band. th.; Western Koijwnv fo.. 17 f. .".04 is di- merry company forgetting all the sorfoll inliiK ;he Michigan rasn. rows. vain regrets and bitter feelings ed a hut in rlmi ease our supreme court of the old year, passed on with the New Year into the dining room, where distinctly finds tluit the rights of the their firs repast of 1907 was awaiting railroad ccmpa:i scented prior to thp nl the center of the table, settlement of the owner on th1 land, them, so thru it was not necessary to Invoke around which all were aealed, waa an and white carthe of te'.ailun and '.lie court Immense lioquet of pink from theie to nations. and radiating did t: it do so. There is the ft. r; her difference he- the end of the table waa an artistic ars the l,cHi.. est and the case at rangement of smllax. After this very early breakfast, a bar. that in the former the title to the musical contest was engaged in. prises lund a, obtained by ion and in the laiter as ,i homestead and, as being awarded to Erin Halverson and At the conclusion uf 1'Olnted nut in t!i.- note in 6 Fed. St. Murray Jacobi. iiii 4f'S there l a distinction bet worn thl. amusing game, the merry crowd departed, having made but this resolutin,, two methi iU of obtaining public tion nt the beginning of the new year lands. that Zina is a capital enter"Resolved It trust lie nulld alto that the laud tainer. and that we. a her guests, am m question lu the as sc of Wells vs. fortunate." The following v. 3f5 IS. IV t exceedingly I'enning-ot- i fo tv attached their names to the unwritten also cited hv the attorney, was resolution: Misses Elite Jacob. By;. tine, by pn tnptlon and not aa a via Straw. Ellen Larkin, Elisabeth hoinc-deaiFssrre. Bertha Btone. Maude Nxlsbe't. Rut whatever may be the holding in Etta 11. (Iverson. Rachel Farley, Joei various u-ch g certainly Larkin. Fannie Halatrom. Mabel true :hst after :be owner of land has Goates of Meadames. Caldwell. iicqiired a pavn1 to hla land from the E. Larkin, and G. Larkin: Messrs. government, the eennty, or other pub- Clark, f'arrigan. Btevena, A. Halverlic hody liavlitL' control of the public son. Jacobs. Tribe, W. Hslrerson, A. highways, can- -i t without f.diowlng lJirkln. ;he lines of urn previous survey or pb:. arbiiror l a out on his land a "Pensiei. she writer, has had a slot county road fun- - eds wide, simnli accep-eat last." Possible?" "Ye necanse the lar ' lies In a cunvoii He wn- home t two o'clock lai c whiidi ,. through vmty road font rid night with an awful yarn, and h' wide has hivti .1 signaled hut (he wife believed it. Milwaukee Sent limits of which h tie never up to that ncl. little been fixed I! :b htvaiif n. : or WANT ADS YIELD BIG RESULTS. There haa hen aa indiscrin-- , ,., creaada ifiinat American conunwi nurpriaea. This most extraordiiutl ATTACK UPOM EU8IYESS corZ? tiona haa involved manufacturer! (i aearly all kinds haa spared few ducera of any sort Each and every one of these enterprises perhaps deserved some critics Whether their opponents have dealt with them justly or not, they ire prom., ly adjusting themselves to the new conditions, and demonstrating to ti business world that in the larger thing they have been governed by hm financial integrity, even if in eome few particular the times were ripe fc reform. Like other great industries, TAX PATEKT VESICIKX ISDU8T1Y coming in for its share of oenanro. Secrecy cf composition haa been the a war-cr- y against these medicines. It wa admitted on th part of patent median manufacturer!, that tW formula were kept secret They felt obliged t do this, in order to pretax imitators from imputing on tho public. After a proprietor had spent hundrsA of thousands of dollars in advertising a remedy, the secrecy of hie formula ww his only protection against ethers stepping in and reaping th reward of tremendous oatlay in advertising. The unwillingness of patent medicine manufacturers to reveal th jj. gradients of their compound was perfectly natural They felt that they L served protection from tho government th wm ae any ether citiaen wh procorae a patent on an invention or a process. BUT THIS COKSIDUi. TI0B DIB HOT XZEP BACK THX CBITICS. Th agitation was kept up until Congress enacted a law making it oblige tory on the part of such manufacturers to expos certain ingredients outk, label of each package. It waa thought beat to include alcohol in tho list of objectionable ingrsf. ienta. This being the only objectionable ingredient contained in Peruna, the manufacturer of this very excellent remedy promptly obeyed th law. Indeed, he voluntarily went forther than this. Dr. Hartman, after aariiw consideration of the matter, has concluded to put PLAINLY OH THH 07 EACH BOTTLE the principal aetiv constituents of which Parana is sow posed. While w do not agree that tho claim against secrecy has been a jt one, yet from thie time on we have oonriuded to take Parana out of the lift if secret patent medicines. n. j We now offer Peruna te public as a regular pharmasn. tieal product It is just as ethical aa any compound put up ij tho medical pro foaaioi. ig straining of medical ethics eu , And it any fonlt with Til PRINCIPAL ACTlYE 1HQBEDIEHTS are prominently incorporated laths label on th bottle, that the people may know that the claims made for Peru have a true justification. Tho only departure wo shall make from medical ethics in th eondnetef Parana affairs in tho fotnre, is th foot that wo shall oontinuo te advertise iM ell our product TO THE PEOPLE, If we would agree to sell to doctors only, to advertise for doctors only, this the medical fraternity would be obliged to recognize Peruna as being entirely within their approve BUT WE 8HALL HOT DO THIS. We shall continue te offer Peruna to th people. W shall eon tii tele convey to the people our claims for Peruna as a household remedy. Wo shall continue to supply tho people with free literature, teaching thorn how to tn our medicine, teaching them how te avoid disease, teaching them many thing of benefit to the home. We shall continue to do thie, whether tho mafim profession like it or not Wo are proposing from this time on to take the public into our confidsaa notwithstanding that some imitators and snbstitnton will bo attemptiny k pnt np something which they consider just good as Parana, w are going b draw aside the veil of secrecy snd allow any one who chooses to know exactly 07 WHAT PEBUHA IS C0HP08ED. This ought to disarm all honest criticism. Wo expect however, that criticism will continue. On some pretext or other those who are envious of tke auoeoss of Peruna will continue to find fault But w are determined te yin such people no jnst complaint PEBUHA IS A GBEAT XEDICIHE. It has become a household word in millions of homea 0or foith in ths remedy is stronger than ever. Every year w expect to establish now plub in foreign lands until the people of all the world are supplied with this n! nablt household remedy. WE ABE GOING TO DO ETEBYTHUTG IN THE OPEN. We are yuisy to tell our customers exactly what they are taking, and let them judge fir themselves how much foundation our critics have for their claims. All we ask of the public is to be as fair with us as wear with them. u WE CLAIH PEBUHA TO BE A CATABBH BEHEDT. Buy a bottle If it helps you, be honest and acknowledge that it has helped you. try it it INGREDIENTS PBIHTED OH THE LABEL We guarantee that eveiy testimonial wo usa is absolutely true in the exact language of ths testifier. Wo guarantee that every photograph published is tho photograph of the person whose name it bears, that every wind of every testimonial wu authorised by ths hand that signed We are determined to beat our opponents by being fairer than they art, by dealing aquarer than they dare to. We an determined to meet folsehod with truth, duplicity with candor, insincerity with sincerity. We know that the users of Perana will appreciate our stand. Wo bolisn that the dealer in Peruna will applaud our course. We expect even ov opponents will be obliged to acknowledge finally that Perana is not only u honest and useful remedy, bnt one of. tho GBEATEST HOUSEHOLD NIDI' ONES OH THE CONTINENT. it t MINE SWINDLER CAPTURED. Dhllatlelpbin. Jan. 5. R. C. Flower alias C. G. Dalner. who has been a fugitive front New York since 1903. where he la wanted to answer chArge of grand larceny and ewliylllng credulous Investors out of about. H.UOO.OUb , cording to the officers, to secure motley from invest Mrs by representing tbit he hsd a wonderful chemical pruo whereby he could make dinnHiqdi and other precious atones and a patent brick. The arrest of Flower end n chan Central Amerlw-Soutthrough Mexico, America and Canada, besldrt many points In the United BtatM. Following hla operations In New York, through which it la alleged many clsty people lost money. Flower J'uaP't ed 1 1 0,606 nail after indictment nn alleged bogus mining operations, was arrested here today. Flower, who the detectives ay is the most colossal mine swindler of the age. was raptured in a big office building where he haa been located for some time. I'nder the name of Professor Oxford, he wa seeking, ac- - May, 1903. YOU CAN GET Z. C. M. I. pre-em- v s, lhl. - Home Made (Shoes For men, boys, misses and children again In Ogden. They are the old reliables, every pair guaranteed, as well the Ladies Pillow Shoes THE SHOE FOR TENDER FEET," at the there wa nxi .ever am ded'eatton fvur rods wide WANT ADS YIELD BIG RESULTS - Fifth Ward Shoe Store 2546 MADISON AVE. BELL PHONE 513-X- - Catalog and Samples. T. A. SHREEVE f.u-be- of ;i rcii'it) uf If you want ns to we will publish your statement exactly as you furnish it to ua Ws will add no words, take away no words. If you wish ns to wo will Wo will not do this without year publish your portrait in oonneotion with written request without your entire consent Peruna has eared thousands of peopls of chronic catarrh, in many phase ui locations. At least, that is what tha people say to ns, through unsolicited testimonials. Peruna will euro many thousand more, in spit of fabricate! danders to the contrary. WE GUABAHTBXETZBT BOTTLE OP P1BUHA TO CONTAIN TE1 e -- I a, |