OCR Text |
Show iJ WERNMRM PHYLLIS SCHLAFLYS REPORT "IS KISSINGER A GLISTRUP? PAGES 6- -7 The Independent Dedicated To The Constitution, Liberty, Morality, and Vol. 7, No. 22 Truth 25 Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 May 27, 1976 FLUORIDATION UGLINESS EXEMPLIFIED: PUBLIC (& PERSONAL) HEALTH ENEMY NO 1 RETURNS Morrison Fred The Attorney General STATE FLUORIDATION stated It has By W. been very aptly The Utah State Board of Health will not be successful in their attempt at mandatory B. Romney Vebxox statewide fluoridation, Mr. ClinATTORNEY GENERAL TJta.ii ton R. Miller predicted as he anB. STATE CAPITOL SALT LAKE CITY DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL nounced today the reactivation of DAB-52the Utah Gtizens Committee Against Compulsory Fluoridation. Our action was prompted by 1976 May 21, the announcement of Dr. Lyman J. Olsen, that the Utah State Board of Health intends to misuse an opinion from the Utah Attorney Dr. Lyman J. Olsen, Director Generals office to try to require Utah State Division of Health mandatory fluoridation of all Utah BUILDING MAIL communities, Mr. Miller said. Qinton R. Miller, who is Dear Dr. Olsen: currently a Republican candidate - I have noted that the Board of Health has decided to hold a series for the U.S. Senate from Utah was of public hearings concerning a proposed amendment to its regulations Chairman of the Utah Gtizen's which would require minimum fluoride content in all public water supplies. Committee Against Compulsory Fluoridation from 1954-6Although the opinion of this office dated January 21, 1976, indicates During that 8 year period Utah that the Legislature enacted statutes so broad that we had to conclude that citizens voted NO to fluoridation the Legislature has given authority to the Board of Health to do this, I in 8 of 8 referendums, keeping strongly urge, as I have previously, that you seriously consider submitting Utah the least fluoridated state in this important policy matter to the Legislature rather than deciding by the U.S. Board action. Mr. Miller said, Contrary to In addition, L am concerned about the Board's decision to limit public the false impression given by the Utah State Board of Health, the hearings to presentation of scientific data only. This would likely violate our state laws relating to administrative procedures governing public hearAttorney Generals office is abings. It could also result in a denial of due process under both state and not in support of solutely federal constitutions. fluoridation. Distasteful as it may be to those of us strongly opposed Another matter which the Board should consider Is the cost of providto fluoridation, Miller added, the ing such services since the Board of Health lacks authority to provide funds opinion accurately and impartially for such a program. reflects the law as it has been litigated in other jurisdictions and Very truly yours. sustained by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Utah, as in all other UJMi C. states, the U.S. Supreme Court has fluoridation treats people William C. Quigley wrongfully ruled that the general medically without their consent. Assistant Attorney General police power of the State may, unless specifically prohibited rJio-foun- d UTAH IMDEPENDERIT to include the power of WCQ:RBH:el 57 Oakland Avenue fluoridation. We can and must This is the police state in its rawest Leonard Wickenden wrote in Only when all efforts to do so fail, amenc the State law to Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 spell out form. 1956: The first duty of any scien- is he entitled to begin to hope that this limitation of the states police Second Ctssa Postsca According to both the Salt tific worker is to cultivate a com- he is right power. Lake Tribune and the Deseret pletely open mind. Very, very few Those who have worked in What is needed, Miller Utah News of May 20, 1976 the Board of (if any at all) of the rabid fluoridation have not only failed in declared, is either action by the Health members agreed that at proponents of fluoridation, this respect, they have shown anUtah State legislature or a State least seven public hearings on particularly those in the public tagonism to anyone who even referendum limiting the fluoridation will be held health (?) field, have ever been able suggests that they may be wrong. ' statutory power presently granted throughout the state in each health to approach the fluoridation quesMr. Wickenden has set forth the Utah State Board of Health. planning district. If these public tion scientifically with an open above what the true scientific The first meeting of the Utah hearings run true to past mind either complete or partial. method is on any and all subjects. Gtizens Committee Against Comme told them one of experience with them, the deck will as in and 30s the back the From For, days pulsory Fluoridation will be held be completely stacked unfair to personally some years ago, It is 40 s since the first suggestion was Saturday, May 22, 7:00 - 10:00 the public at large because of not a debatable issue. All the thin- made to fluoridate public water at the South Salt Lake biased information, and king has been done. He didn't tell supplies' down to and including p.m., 2480 South State Street, Library, me who had done all the thinking particularly so to those who opMay 20, 1976, the date this article is Salt Lake Gty. The public is in- but I had the distinct impression written, the . promoters (in this Vltcd pose fluoridation. A clue to this is disA MINORITY OF ONE that the newspaper reports that it was by him and his fellow instance the Utah State Board of Americanism was based upon cussion at the hearings will be resTo continue the Health with Dr. Lyman Olsen as perpetrators. the Truth that tricted to the scientific aspects of quotation: He must have no the director of the State Division of . is a everyone minority of one and fluoridation. ft- previous convictions. He must Health) continue to prate that disThis is also an indication of never set out to prove something; cussion at die hearings will be res- of one with God being a majority. sJ In the Declaration of in his tricted to the scientific aspects of the coming police state in Utah if rr: he must be single-mind.it was such - isearch for the truth. fluoridation when the proponents Independence they are successful in their I p ; Vi Z3 A student in a scientific themselves know that to this very minorities of one who joined to attempted coup. As important as X t he scientific aspects are, they are in cannot mutually pledge to each other their O college is always taught (if his date they themselves lives, fortunes and sacred honor, as : reality the least important of all the professor is worth his salt) that, produce one single actual study 'I before deciding that his con- which even faintly indicates that they sought to be a majority by a objections to the fluoridation issue. ... . firm reliance upon a Divine This will be brought out a little clusions on any subject are right, he artificially fluoridated water, Providence. further along. must try to prove them wrong. on page 1 1 that "things that sound too good to be true usually are. Nowhere does this have a more true application than to the fluoridating of public water supplies. For, as one prominent man of science said after examining the grossly exaggerated and deliberately distorted (falsified) claims of the (or willfully dishonest) proponents before even the first pilot project in this nation had been completed, "Fluoridation is the greatest con game of all time." There has been no solid reason to change this description from that day to this. The Utah State Board of Health is now working to become the current perpetrator of this deception as they are again currently undertaking to arbitrarily impose this greatest of all frauds upon the people of this state. Why the arbitrary imposition of this fake of all fakes? Because they know they cannot convert the great majority of the people of this state to accept fluoridation voluntarily, as the people have overwhelmingly rejected it at the polls; time and again. Utah is now to be made into a police state where the citizens (more properly called slaves) are to be compelled to do the things considered to be for their (public) good without their own personal choice. For those who equate this with chlorination, keep in mind that chlorination treats water while State of Roheht Haxslx 61 over-exuber- ant 2. it OsftlcaOty. too-bro- ad . self-evide- nt ed -- J : -i 1 J con-Continu- ed j K' i |