OCR Text |
Show The Paper That Dares To Take A Stand Page 10 The Utah Independent February 26, 1976 DOG DAY AFTERNOON REVOLUTIONARY RED AND ROTTEN irw Mahogany perverted and subverted the innocent and unsuspecting masses for many a moon. Sidney the sick orLefty Lumet, however you want to label him, is a liberal, to say the least. His crimson creations include A View From The Bridge, Fail Safe, Twelve and The Pawnbroker. Sidney is the son of Baruch Lumet, a New York Yiddish actor, who put little Sid on the right ah, correction make that The left track. Later in life Lefty Lumet was picked up by CBS.. .thats not the Communist Broadcasting System... although it appears to lean in that direction. There he became a staff director.. .injecting his pinkish in over 300 films. If personality you ever wondered why the kids are corrupted watching that Bolshoi Box...you can stop now. Just look at whos running the Angrv Men, show. Dog Day CHRIS SARANDON makM hi motion picture doOut m the pivotal roH o Leon in Warner Bro.' "Dog Day Afternoon,' directed by Sidney Lumet. A graduate of West Virginia Univoraity. Sarandon made hit Broadway stage debut m The Rothschilds.' followed by Two Gentlemen at Verona. Al Pacino stars m 'Dog Day. which was written for the screen by Frank Pierson. Martin B ragman and Marlin Elf and produced. pwnewuB By Anthony J. Hilder Entertainment Reviewer pervert with pride and passion, Its a film for faggots and those motley maggots who breed in the cesspool of socialism. Its If youre a Keynesian Queen who loved Oscar Wilde and Adlai Stevenson, frequent Gay Bars in Baltimore, or are one of those employees of the State anti-Americ- Department, or simply like to expose yourself before the boys in the locker room at the Y...this ones for you. Al Pacino comes off his role as King of the Mafia in Godfather Part II" to play Queen of the Bronx in Dog Day Afternoon. Its quite a switch hit. And Pacino portrays the anti-orde- an, anti- r, straight, and filled with hate and four letter filth. Varner Bruthers putz it out.. .for zee zickies. And Martin Bergman and Marty Elfand produced this pinko stin-k- o for them. Dog Day" is infected and directed by Sid Lefty Lumet, whose poisonous pictures have is revolutionary, red and rotten to its cancerous core. Its designed to catch the crowd. And it does! If its audience is mindless or spineless it could be sucked into support for the sick scene and for the most part Dog Day accomplishes this end. Lumet p ictures Pacino as the hero and the police as der villains. Its the same old stock pink propaganda pitch...but its done in an alarming, disarming Its damned dangerous. way. Many more of these and youll see the crime rate soar...butthen,if ANOTHER PINKO STINKO Anthony J. Hilder Entertainment Reviewer By Mahogany is angry, affected, and ugly. Its pent up and bent up with herculean hate; the kind that brews in the belly of the black bigot. The picture is pure prejudice. It caters to the Harlem and his Hearted Harlequin Heathen Hedonism. Hog is a honky Zipper, whitey whipper...that appeals to antedeluvian antics of the the Piltdown People. Mahogany is punishingly played by Diana Ross, who turns in a torrid treatment for this trashatrical, with zing and sting....And she does the thing well. Her leftist" lover, Billy Dee Williams, portrays Brian, whos a proud politician running for Alderman in a Chicago welfare ward. The story is a pinko plot liberal thats infected with And neither Brian nor comrade cliches hold the films body together any better than the disease. It falls apart, frame by frame. As the crusading candidate, Billy Dee delivers his rambling red rhetoric to the Wards white workers". ..ah, theyre those honky hard hats, red necks, rubes and boobs. This gets the garbage going when they begin throwing more than their weight about. Naturally, as in all the rest of these hate whitey and the blacks are the almighty.. .fan the flame films, those Honky Heavies are fat, sloppy, slovenly and represent the Motown image of the paddy people. In case you are unfamiliar with the word, paddy means to the blacks what nigger means to the whites. leprosy. his youre pushing for more government control, this is the way to pull it off. THE SCOTT REPORT Bv Paul Scott KISSINGERS CONTROLLED RESISTANCE Washington: A chilling analysis of Secretary of State Kissinger's policy of no-w- pursuing in belligerency in Angola has been prepared by Henry Paolucci, the highly respected professor of government at St. Johns University and editor of the State of the Nation publication. One of the nations keenest observors of Kissinger and his detente policy, Paolucci charges that the Secretary of States Angola policy is a carefully laboratory experiment con-trib- ed a his own fail-saf- e r alternative rules strategy which, by definition, out both passive surrender and open-ende- d military escalation to avoid defeat. That has been our policy since 1961. It has cost us a protracted surrender in Vietnam, concessions to arms superiority to the enemy, and collapse of three limited-wa- successive presidencies.... All one needs to confirm this disastrous policy of defeatist interventionism today, according to Paolucci, is to carefully examine the results since Kissinger became Documenting Kissingers key role in the formation of victory-les- s limited war policies going back as far as the Kennedy Administration, Paolucci writes: "When Kissinger cavorts like a hawk these days pleading for a last spasm of aid to our side in some distant trouble spot, we can be sure the cause he purports to defend i lost. He did it in the last days of Vietnam. He is doing it again as the curtain falls in Angola. His plea is invariably for insufficient aid, enough to prolong the fighting but not to avoid defeat, since defeat, by the logic of detente, is the price he has committed us to pay for Soviet-support- ed global peace. Kissinger had been arguing since 1937 that, if forced to choose between all out war and passive would Americans surrender, He therefore former. the choose urged President Kennedys advisers to forestall such a choice by the dominant foreign policy maker, his foreign policy writings of the late 1930 and early 1960s, and his latest policy statements and press conferences. A graphic example of Kissingers most recent confirmation of his policy that resistance to communism must be continued but also must be manifestly inadequate is the Secretary of States press conference on Angola and Detente. CONTROLLED RESISthat TANCE Kissinger Noting told newsmen that if the Soviet Union continues action such as Angola, we will, without question, resist, Paolucci pointed out how the Secretary of State then qualified that resistance, writing: Resist without question, then, but how, and to what end? For detentes sake, Kissinger hastened to qualify, our resistance must, of course, be manifestly inadequate. We are talking, Kis . singer stressed, about trivial sums. In addition if the Soviet-backe- d MPLA prevails over the other Marxist revolutionary factions contending for succession in Portuguese rule in Angola, we can live with it our Secretary of State assured reporters since we have no permanent interests in Angola. Asked whether intervention with trivial sums might not, nevertheless, escalate into another Vietnam, Kissinger replied confidently: Let us not fool ourselves about what happened in Veitnam. We did not start in Vietnam with a few hundred men and wake up one morning and have 300,000 troops there. Every step in Vietnam was a conscious decision that was publicly known and to which there was no significant objection when there was still time to do something about it. There is no possibility that the same thing could happen in Angola, when even the first step has produced such an intense debate. Kissingers point is that our Vietnam intervention dangerously open-ende- was d (sometimes aiming at military victory, sometimes not) whereas our Angola intervention is strictly controlled in concept as well as means. BEHIND Anthony Parkins whips up tho anger and hatred in this fight with Billy Dee Ullllana In a scene from Mahogany. Thla propaganda picture and serves as fuel taitdixskaxMgusjr for black bigotry. pronotea prejudice, KISSINGERS But why should KisPOLICY singer want the U 5 . to get involved in a conflict we dont mean to win like in Vietnam and Angola? Paolucci reports that Kis- - singer gave his frankest answer to that question in a book written in the 1960s and titled The Necessity The book was For Choice. sell the policy of to designed help limited-wa- r as a replacement for President Eisenhowers doctrine of massive retaliation. As Paolucci puts it: Urging unilateral disarmers to support limited-wa- r strategy as an altemateroute to their own goal, Kissinger cautioned them that, in face of Soviet aggressive behavior, if we reject the concept of limited war, our only options will be surrender or all-o- ut war. Since surrender will not be our national policy, it is important to get our choices straight, and he con- cluded: The worst that could happen if we resisted aggression by means of limited war is what is certain to happen if we continue to rely on the Eisenhower strategy of the past decade. Limited war is based on a kind of tacit bargain not to exceed certain restraints. We must enter it prepared to negotiate and to settle for something less than our traditional notion of victory. Limited war is palatable only when compared with other even starker alternatives. It is, to be sure, a subtle and complex task, and it presupposes a rare blend of and psychological, political, skills. military Paolucci stresses that Kissinger has certainly proved since 1969 that he has the rare blend of skills required to get a mighty people to lose a limited war as a bloody alternative to popularly unacceptable outright surrender." Defeatist intervention in Angola is clearly something very close to the bottom line for the limited war alternative to surrender, states Paolucci as he points out how our oil cartels and aid to Moscow puts us in a position of helping both sides in Angola. In conclusion, Paolucci notes: Kissinger calls it policy. History, however, is bound to record it as a protracted crime against the American Commonwealth which the professor has been able to pursue with impunity thus far only because so very many persons in high places have too long collaborated with him. ex-Harv- |