OCR Text |
Show 14A Sunday Herald y, MAY tf, 1980 = . Analyst Gives Pros, brighten the scenery Cons of ABM Dispute head missiles in the 1970's in By DONALD H. MAY penetrate a Soviet WASHINGTON UPI) —‘‘De- order to fensive systems,” Soviet Pre- ABM. Alexei mier Kosygin once’ N. —The g is all about, and print linen pant dress. s dds the final touch to the on Nixon are not the cause of wants to start th said,” the armsrace, but constitute a its own ABMaga’ the f Soviet SS9 ICBM. factor preventing the death of threat of The Russians, Rathjens said 33 Howthen would Russia react to a U.S. antihallistic missile system? How would ABM—@ defensive system—affect the arms race? How would it affect *20 way be building up their offensive missiles forces to penetrate the proposed U.S 4pM—and so on. Takes Years To Desig prospects for talksto limit that Because it takes years to race? design and build offensive and These have become key defensive systems, each coun. {issues in the current ABM try reacts “to his worst fears debate, Some proponents have of what the others will do long . . cited Kosygin’s statement, madejn a long news conference before he doesit in 1967, as evidencethat Russia The fe, and more carefree than The printed voile three piece culotte suit. lect accent for the vest and blouse is Department Defense of ABM would ‘not react with further argues that the type which jt proposes—one which would protect U.S. ICBMs Opposing View tabilizes An opposing view was put against Soviet attack—s forth by George W. Rathjens, the aru.o race. Pentagon the so, does It former White House and) arms escalation. Dy preserving the U.S. Pentagon advisor and now argues, t to nuclear war and by visiting professor of political deterren the Soviet Union) ging discoura setts Massachu science at the to a Institute of Technology, conventior. of physicists here last week. race arms He argues thatthe is propelled by “actions and reactions.” —The United States built up| from any ideas that it might someday overcome this deterrent and be able to mount al “first strike” which would knock out the U.S, power to | retaliate, Moscow radio, meanwhile ng Safeguard its missile force in the 1960s has been denounci because it feared a “missile as a creation of the U.S. “military-industrial complex. gap.” —The United States is; But it has not said how Russia | preparing to deploy multiwar- would react to it. Washingto., Window Congress Urges That Others Disclose Funds; But Drags Its Own Feet By FRANK ELEAZER jchoked down a spoonful or two) | WASHINGTON (UPI) —Con-jof this ethical cure. en are enthusiastically! Members said _everybody| prescribing for the ethicalills|knew they were honest and that} ‘of the federal bench a medicine |this treatment suggested they they administered to them-|weren't. Some were embar- selves only reluctantly in tiny rassed to ownup to their riches) doses. and others to admit they were ee coven is the marae poy, Senate ‘ GOP Leacer| e drug. \Everett M. Dirks lained ‘The idea {s that taxpayers) congressmen eebneen ep etind now sotined to second-class citizenship. | outside (and possibly conflictip-| ing) interests and income ota Rout iol officials, elected and appointed, |Senate were shaken by discloeuch 2 a sure that the electorate certain- ni eet reSe eory ily tgaee the conduct of| of Impeachment, publie| official hired hands. It! Short developed that censuring one @isclosure is about the omly|senator and excluding one| eoncrete suggestion the lawma-|House member wasn’t enough) fers have come up with in thelt satisfy the public outery|| ease of Supreme Court Justice| about ethics. t ‘Abe Fortas, who is reported to Both chambers adopted ethi-|| have banked ; a $20,000 ‘ check jeal codes for theAchat members, vhoosd| from the family foundation of|oiuding th the much-ballyho ig stock manipulator), eonvicted Louis E. Wolfson. ne ¢ public disclo-| House Same Re Republican jsure. Now, in spectator this season the 91st Congress, | ‘the initial dosage has just run) Leader), 3 7 and is) Gerald R. Ford was thefirst iea, id the House hold in the Senate,| to federal|‘@king all judgesfor ofapplication ‘‘tne same public where members have until May| disclosure rules” applying to 15 to get in their reports. and officials of| The clisical evidence so ter, congressmen the executive branch. |though still being weighed, is W. McCormack|that the prescription was) Speaker John the proposal, suggesting Proper but the dosage too | echoed that if the legal fraternity |small. Most House members,| (through its judicial council) |the taxpayers learn, make didn’t voluntarily accept ajmoney in addition to thelr| suitable dose of this medicine, government pay, from owner-| Congress might prescribe it by Ship ey taboat by 7 everything for all you ladylike sports—shopping, luncheons, teas, meetings—spectators take the prize . . . they're a tradition among women wholike winning the from mortuaries to fashion game in black and white, These and other such con. banks. navy and white and brown and ional testimonials to the| How much they make still is} efficacy of public disclosure are|@ secret, except where they) somewhat surprising consider- élect to divulge it. white in two heel heights. ing the geeging and protest) Senators defined public di with which the 90th Congress\Closure even more Douglas Once i Charged With your choice y requiring only that members| admit to their gifts and honorariums, some of which,it turns out, run as much as |$20,000 a year. | re sai ote ‘ | The real ‘“disclosure’’—tax Outside Fees returns in the case of the L senate and dollar figures i> the WASRINGTON (UPI) — Aticase of the House—goes into the time Supreme Court Justice sealed envelopes for inspection William 0. Douglas was alleged by ethics committees only by! to have been paid fees by a majority vote if the affected foundation, he wrote Chief member gets into trouble. Justice Earl Warren that As for the officials of the “historically, many justices/executive branch, contrary to hhave had outside activities.’ |Ford’s apparent belief, ‘they “Let me also say that there|don’t disclose anything, except w VANITY EATR Every Body's Bra is not named that for nothing. R's reatly something, the way reports from all over the country repeat the same raves... Feels better than any bra I've ever worn _..The nylon and Lycra® spandex power net is terrific... has been noconflict whatsoever |to their immediate bosses and between the foundation and my certainly not including their work on the court,” Douglasjreal bosses who pick up the wrote to the chief justice. tabs, Earlier this week when the) Fortas might and might not controversy broke over Justice|have been deterred from Abe Fortas and his receipt of dealing with the Wolfson fees, Sen. John J. Williams, R-/Foundation (whose money, inDel., inserted into the Congres- cidentally, he later returned) sional Record the letters from|by disclosure requirements like Warren and Douglas. any of these. If it was a fee he Williams, in his remarks oM|took, the senate rules wouldn't the flour, noted that Fortas be required him to mention it. returned his $20,000 fee from If it was a foundation gift,| the Wolfson Foundation in house rules would have exempt- December 1966. Williams said: ed_ it. | throughout the country,” f “It is significant that Justice Whatever it was, whatever he Fortas never returned this|did with it, disclosure rules of: $20,000 fee until after Justice|the executive branch would Douglas had been caught with have left him secure in the) his hands in the same cookie knowledge that (except for the jar and had been severely nosiness of the ipress you and I) reprimanded in the press never would have known about! lit. Gives me the right lift and line for my clothes... Comes in colors | love... Costs onty $4. Acup 32 to 36, B and C cups, 32 to 38 (@nd now, Dcup 32 to 49, $5) |