| Show TWO genealogies the NEWS has baa been favored with a communication from mr J A robin son eon Ar arkansas karium city kansas in which the writer refers refer tu to some ome editorial re marks marka recently made by this paper on awad aau uumo we br ba viewer ilaya be me idle tor im abr main points meto me ibe to goes a allep tarther V old it as aa the height of f to put what he calls calla a saw bag upon mr webb the apo apostal stAe and he be also ito eularea eo larea vilim roberta acted ia man in X xe ce e to appear before a selected mud I 1 aoe ustes instead of badre the robb proper but having so BU tar far expressed his bia approval ot of our bur coin com commenia me menta ut she be cor fogue fou nae Ue i suds occasion to make it clear that he be haws views of hla his own upon a number of questions quest iune dot die cussed by the ibe newis ax esaud and each ot of which would sequire attention olion separately raoof these questions concerns the of our lord mr jobin bobin oaf sovi as aa near aa can be gathered from feona bib jetter asserts that christ was wa the son BOD ot off javid david only oaly by adoption adopt iun and that the genealogy of fit mary la is not by the for the lion of our oar correspondent it may tit bf eted that it la is those rhose abu have studied the have arrived at the matthew gives loe ane genealogy 0 joaeph while luke copies the kenta keuer logical legion record of mary the name 0 josepha lather was jacob while thui thai at 01 his hia father ln in law jaw mary marys le father wao wa hell and one evangelist traces anc anco eairy of jacot jacob while the othet given that of hell as a glance at the two to tables will make to any reader juseph anti and mary both dt df amended from abraham the house c 11 I 1 david and joseph fron abiud abitia the eldest HOD aon and adl mary rabbas the youngest youn geat lu in Z family the two branches of the douse bouee of david were united blieu the daughter tighter tu of neri was wae marbled to salathiel Balu thiel jobus therefore both through the lineage of joseph whose adopted son BOO he was wan anti ana mary hold belu lu iu his hia all the ne privileges lagee of the whole W bole family amily or daviu there is ia a seeming difficulty diffie Ully in the fact that luke commenter oommen cea eg hla his record cord with joseph of mary but it must be remembered that the biographer simply abe record as he found alband aus lu in the public arob ivee of 01 coise was waa recorded as aa the son ut of joseph having his NO fad th the evangelist however at onue to abe record of josephs maiher bulaw law hell hall justean 1 of boilow lag ift that of f big bia natural lather father jacob TAO custom of recognizing adopted was ID the jewish genealogies appears to hat been quite Ire frequent quent on OD coin luke 11 27 with matthew h 12 and I 1 ill 1 17 that who was waa the son on vf of Jec houiss slid aud the sun lu low law of nor neri gains gaina a place in the tables bahoh in the same way as aljoseph Joseph the importance of this record may be from the tact that from too the first it was waa to ai by authentic that our loru was the at Abra Abrec tiam tiana ana ui oi david for it ir he 0 not be proven preen to be the promised to be fathers fathera A aaa nu 90 bae use la labbee bles have never aea success ully availed assailed to hear beat now that the be gt genealogy of mar marykwas Mary Y iwas was never reo rec crded algir elp no khlok lt it aee mee wenry for far some bible goibe 40 athe historical part oi of the new testament Teat ament |
