| Show QUITE CLEAR to a level beaded observer the merite of the subject which has been ventilated 7 41 before judge loofbourow during this week seems perfectly clear in it nutshell the question involved inthis are there any purposes in unison with the intent of the donors and lawful in their character to which the es cheated personal property of the church can be applied the affirmative of this interrogatory has been plainly and proved on the part ortho of the contributors of the fund 4 the poor and building of placed of worship are n direct line with alie he original objects of the donors of the means in question all efforts to show that there was ever the remotest purpose on the part of those who created the fund by their contributions to make objects of charity of the non mor m mon on people of utah is absurd abs on Us its face the question of public policy enters into the question of the adrion ability of thus humiliating them by diverting the fund to the use and bena fit of public schools scho olp |