Show victimizing THE CHURCH THE dissenting opinion of chief justice zane on the matter matte of the leasing by receiver dyer to the highest bidder of the tithing kitbing office premises appears in this issue in full it is exceedingly extreme and decidedly premature it is based on the false premise that tithing is I 1 iam ald and u ed for 0 the encouragement of polygamy we deny this assertion and the right of the chief justice to make the assumption if he were challenged to substantiate it we do not believe he could in the slightest degree nit from the judges judged reasoning it would appear as if he presumed it to be right if it was believed that property was used for an illegal purpose for its proprietor to be robbed of it our recollection of the arrangement for leasing the premises to the persons who are using them judging from the statements of pi parties brues at the time is that it was intended that it would continue until a final decision of the whole case should be reached in that reason it is to be inferred the lease was made so that it could be terminated should an exigency such as the decision would produce demand the taking of that step now the lease is terminated and for what purpose according to the asserted reason that the church may be mulcted mulched of more money and the proportions of the gigantic robbery be thus increased the shamelessness of this victimizing ti process is all the more glaring in view of the fact that the people of the church are the only rightful owners of the property involved in the whole scheme of plunder yet while the question of possession is pending in the highest court of the land not a single doubt as to how that tribunal will decide is thrown to the side of the real owners owner of the property the very least that ought to have been done seeing the genuine proprietors were paying rent for the the use of their own premises was to let et the matter remain until a final decree was reached this last proceeding is a most ravenous one from every standpoint |