Show persistent IN WRONG OF COURSE the author of the untruth that no I 1 mormons cormons Mor mons and gentiles in utah are doing business together persists in his falsehood we didiot expect he would retract or in any way acknowledge his error that would be too much like honor and sincerity instead he be delivers himself of nearly a column of dodging and prevarication and i scurrility with the view of kivin giving g color to his original mendacious statement prominent I 1 gentiles have stated so us that they knew the assertion about no union in business between mormons cormons Mor mons and gentiles was a lie before the refutation appeared in the NEWS there is not a no noo mor mon in this city who has done business here for six that does not know of numerous instances of joined business relations between gentlemen of both classes we are asked to particularize we do not choose to deag in the names of either Mor or non mor mons mon to make them parties to a 8 newspaper dispute there Js is no necessity fur for it the theauthor author of the falsehood knows ahem them as well as we and nothing can be gained by keeping up a co controversy Veray which everybody here knows to have but one truthful side gentlemen of the two classes who are daily doing business together as members of the same ofin firm or corporation in various pursuits must be either amused or disgusted at the impudence of the individual who persists in saying no such relations exist in attempting to reply to our remarks he now adds tilt it says they do exist in all the great cities of the country that is tine the coop co op buys goods in chicago st louis and new york and the city through mormon agents buys pipe in some other city and fire engines in another etc that proves nothing of course it proves nothing we never said it did we did not say anything about business relations of mormons cormons Mor mons with gentiles in the great cities of the coutry country we made no reference to Chicag Chic agoSt oTiSt louis new york or any place outside of utah that is but a dodge of the disreputable scribe to shift his ground and evade the force of exposure what we said was this ic armons or mons and gentiles are in business relations in all the populous cities of utah that 11 counts 11 does it not the signs of b business business firms firm hung shung up in this city advertisements and local items in the paper that publishes the statement that these relations reat lons do not exist articles of incorporation filed inthe in the recorders c this county and other aber indisputable proofs of business partnerships of Mormon gentiles in this city proclaim the falsehood of tb tbt Q assertion to tb the e contrary and the dishonesty of its au author thoris is still further d by the falsification of our remarks As A another quirk to shift from the main issue he be wants to know when has a gentile no matter how accomplished ever obtained from a mormon except when it was impossible to do with out him this is as ae great a falsehood by I 1 implication as the other was by direct amer assertion tion there has never been a time in utah when it was wae impossible for I 1 mormons Mor mons nw to do without employing gentiles and there never was a time in this territory orv when gentiles lived here that some of them have not been employed by cormons mormons Mor Morn mons ions no doubt in many instances sons of both classes were seeking employment mormons cormons Mor mons have preferred men of their own persuasion but the other class have not been excluded and many of them have been set to work to our ur personal knowledge from simple motives of charity this is as noto notorious ious as the of the two classe sand further farther proves the mendacity of the ta writer who denies it this ought to be sufficient on these points point s but we do not expect those who fabricate such articles to deceive the public abroad as we have i given some perhaps too much attention to will cesse cease to fume and falsify and flounder in the mire of mendacity no matter how ridiculously erroneous their sentiments are proven to be nor how plain the facts are to their own readers |