| Show IN THE COURTS nine mormons cormons sent bent to the uary A lady iu in custody IN THIRD DISTRICT COURT today andrew amundsen of south bouth jordan dalt dait latec lake county informed the ike court that tbt he be desired to change his aia plea ot not guilty to one of e guilty of of unlawful cohabitation T big was Z al lowed and mr Amund sens attorney bi cli eui lurther time and was ready tor for seti fleurence tence the court coun then of mr Amund amundsen seh as t u uis uia re ige family alid condition and asked askea have yuu anything to say why the court should nol noi ints you judgment mr amundsen no sir burt yon know I 1 suppose that the orect ot of the law IA to 10 prescribe punishment for the same api pose as a man punishes his bis so thai filst ahey will not offend again agarn precisely abat and nothing more it I 1 aielt salla tied that you would so go to tco our no me and obey tae laws atthe nall I 1 woul bould d not send you to fall all lor for a moment pun asti keut comes when poin KU vidolaw me law J baat list Is w hen you iut your baiad in tile are ane court nas no more te leet IL ing about it thul joau tile tire has iu in burning your hana all the law wants im IH to be carried out so that there will be a ceu bation of the of felce cice to which yon yoa have pleaded guilty you must pay a fine of oswand GA and be e I 1 leoned lu iii tae tor for 80 dayer days was abis ibid gentie gentleman mau gave hemsell up to ate tracers thia mo ruing helas he was indicted during the zane zan dickson dickso mc kay reign anen the infamous segregation rule was resorted to for the purpose po of increasing the law laws pen penalties 91 ties on mormons cormons Mor mons there were lour four indictments indict menta against mr bateman Bate mau today mr clarke informed the court that under ue toe decision of the supreme court of the united states three of these were void and they were accordingly dismissed to the flie other mr mi bateman pleaded guilty mr huun 1 1 understand the defendant waives ape P e ana desires sentence now DOW V to the tac court mr bateman said he bad lit in utah 48 8 years had 19 children was 50 66 years of age lived in west vest jordan balt Lake Like county court have flave you anything aDYth lug to say bay why judgment should not be pro aulle d against 3 ou mr bateman no sir air the court As 18 1 I have gave often said to others standing filere you yon stand mr bateman Bate mau I 1 am at a loss lose to say how bow much mach punishment shall be inflicted foe ot at all ail these proceedings to la to 10 stop lac thins thing you have dean guilty of frow from belu dune here I 1 have to dutcide what the amount of punishment shall be lor the offense itself but the object la is mostly to stop slop you and other mon man from doing the same act low the government ia not se be ireae in its ils punishment but bat it is in flexible and what the court wants ifa know kaow is ie what I 1 is to stop a ban in liue like you from repeating abat bat you loll have done my idea is abat hainan does wrong be be pun I tor it it yon will put ut your fluber in the lire fire as I 1 said to another man just now you will get burned it you transgress the law you will be punished the same result follows in both cases la in these cues cases I 1 have to exercise my best and soundest discretion the sentence of the court is that you pay a fine of 1 75 5 and be incarcerated in the penitentiary for or 85 days dayd and yuu stand committed until the fine is paid samuel W woolley of grantsville Grants ville tooele thoele county came next he also gave himself into custody this morning the indictment against him was found in 1887 and accused him of living with three wives to this charge he pleaded guilty I 1 and informed t the ile court that he be was ready to receive sentence mr yeung I 1 would remind the court that mr bateman and ur mr woolley surrendered themselves and that that showed good faith of an all intention to obey the law court that was a tacit admission to that effect the object of the I 1 law aw is to prevent a repetition of the eff ense it is in to reform the individual to stop the offense and protect society and it if a nan man does not obey the law he must take the consequences the question is how much punishment to is necessary to educate a man to a differ ent course As I 1 said before it if I 1 felt satisfied that a mere fin s would prevent you from doing this thing a again gain the court would not impose any farther punishment upon you buti but I 1 have no control over your future actions I 1 cannot make any bargain wito with a crim criminal or anybody else I 1 have to take you as you stand before me and look upon you from the 0 sense offense to which you have pleaded guilty the sentence ot of the court is that youapao a flue fine of 80 and be imprisoned in the penitentiary for or 90 days 1 you will stand committed till dayao the fine e is paid the other business transacted by judge sandford ws vise as follows ellas elias morris vs philip W tu Tn kett default and vardell lodgment as prayed martin D wardell vs hannah wardell plaintiff allowed to amend complaint matilda openshaw vs utah nevada vada railway company motion t to 0 amend order argued james hawker vs C A north motion I 1 lo 10 0 costs costo argued D cook vs M Vande barker motion to relax costs submitted DISTRICT xa COURT yesterday six biz mormons cormons Mor mons were we re before judge Bo boreman remau at beaver to be sentenced for living with their wives the vindictiveness which judge boreman has always exhibited toward anything of mormon has not abated it in the least as is apparent from the act that in each instance he gave the full penalty of the law to thed e fenda fend ants ats six months in the penitentiary and a fine of and costa Those sentenced were john Covington Thos chamberlain cornelius Mc Me Keavy Reavy andrew anderson J harvey langford and george perkins ferkins they were brought to this city arriving this morning and placed in the penitentiary the ca cases see against L D watson and simeon tophal still remain to be tried I 1 the case of emily crane watson is set for tomorrow dec 20 she is still in custody for refusing to answer the following questions what is your full name are you acquainted with lorenzo D watson during the last two years has lo 10 reazo D watson lived at your house are you a married or unmarried lady who to is the lather father of your child ivy Is lorenzo D watson the lather father of your child ivy the lady stated that t her ground of refusal was that t the he answers would tend to criminate herself she is un der indictment now for having lived with mr air watson and as a witness thought it her right righetto to refuse to tea testify 21 against herself her counsel algne argued that the court coart could not compel such puch an unwarrantable proceeding proceeding edin which was eap exp expressly re a I 1 forbidden by t the e territorial statute t at te and the laws of the united krates notwithstanding this the judge decided that the lady must answer he said the law meant that the evidence obtained under such circumstances could not net be used against her the witness still maintained her right to refuse to testify to any matters that would tend to criminate her and was ordered committed to the custody of the united states marshal one of the lat letters deputies wm Thompson who shot and killed E M dalton was there and the lady objected to being placed in his bis cab tedy as she was fear bulof injury by hita him finally sue one was taken charge of by another officer it was expected that she and baby would be sent to this city to be incarcerated I 1 ft the penitentiary but she was kept at beaver because her case was set for hearing tomorrow B A spear correspondent of the sati anti mormon I 1 sheet in abi this city ws was arraigned god and pleaded pieced not bilty to it i charge of li beling deputy marshal cpr dyer the h grand jury was till march 2 unless sool sooner lter called together by the court FIRST COURT proceedings before judge Hender hendersn wn yesterday at ogden john N perkins was admitted to practice before the bar of the pint first district court of utah territory in the case ol of the united states vs frances gunnell unlawful cohabits tion defendant was arraigned and pleaded guilty sentence was set for december he was arraigned on another indictment charging a similar offense but atit to that he pleaded not guilty as it covered a period of the time embraced emo raced in the former charp charge to he hod had pleaded guilty and that case was dismissed the case of the people etc vs W H howard obtaining money under false pretenses was resumed and concluded the jury brought in a verdict of not guilty and defendant who had bad suffered some three months imprisonment was discharged charles Bron sofi and charles mickle waite arrested on a charge of burglary were arraigned and pleaded wt not guilty in the case of A thompson vs va P F M brown browa an order was entered dismiss I 1 inythe t case brahe the e case of the corinne mill kill caul canal stock co vs wm johnson wu was continued linued tor for the term fred tout and george cave were admitted to citizenship |
