| Show THE COSTS STEAL HOW THEY IT vf IN ux coalla TATION CASES A subject that has caused consid able comment lately the ex orbita amount of costs taxed d I 1 in a iri irl trials S no bac the edmunds law w was 1 s brought ild tid the third district co court u rt this arub up by bya a motion ofa ud kellar gellar nes stort the costs in the miner cage case in i judgment these costs ha had been dek dei nat hat hated ed as marshals Mar shara feeg feel 30 90 cieri eldri fees 1750 att attorneys oriley fees dot doe bocki and special va total ju j harkness stated that no obee was made to tile the clerk item aa th was all tight right the objections ii e taken to the other items before proceeding wi with tb the u a ment mr varlan varian reque requested sted t thi sj miller marshal irela Ir elands nd cleri clerk j sworn which was agreed agre ed to t 0 mr miller testified tes titled that he had bad pared an itemized bill in the theil nj WI case that in loa lon going over the account second time tie he found foaud he tie had notto far enough back at ane and made the marshals fees out 40 instead ot of ogo as hal halad charged in the tile execution judge harkness then briefly itna irga the question contending in red mui to the marshals fees that ot 1 actual expenses of the Marsha marshal lell teil jell case could be charged that fees could not be included included thel the the marshai marshal marh mars hal hai was simply the disbo ol ticer licer that in tile the of witness fees had bee been a left on could not now be inserted and anad 1 amount 1 an 0 U D 1 mso improperly cabadi called lii ili 8 chals h ails alls f fees e es shoula should he stricken ricken nt out the bill the charging charlins charel charil ns of fees feer forr fory nesses examined before the granik grandt was not proper costs of a prose ohl which did not commence until unta i niina of the tile indictment I 1 jurors fees 2425 2423 2425 were i improperly included and should al al lovied with reference to them fee tee of 50 he held that them theol amount chargeable as us costs waiting allowed by law and the tile loved the district attorney by government dad had ijo xio blib blim there that was the Govern government ineat si 0 lowance and could not be jc ic charged to a defendant mr varian contended that z al 31 was no statute ordale leof leot of court go gorr gore in costs iu in criminal crit ninal cases these nur of expense incurred should be chr chu to the defendant as costs it wis VIS intention of the government 0 in o t class of cases to fix the eife elfe on the defendant in tile the discretion the trial judge the prosecution co 0 when tile the 11 grand jury toor took to h 0 of tiie the case and even at tbt the comm slon sion signers sio ners ers examination the tem ioa jurors fui ors jors fees mr varlan varian iwuc not have been charged judge jude rein arted ibn eleize euce ence i to the commenced commencement t ofala I 1 ii tion llon that it could not e be bm set eli DM the filing of an indictment I 1 as beginning with a com dom commuting committal mitti ng a til tid the absurd absurdity ltv of such a would be shown in a ai the expenses of a lust just justice c of fh theft incurred in a preliminary exama ekada wha what the defendant in this casem carem was that the attorneys and swi dwi teil fees be placed at the proper it court could not add udd lees tees as they had not been the judgment lu in connection with this matio arl varian varlan moved that the co comm account of marshals fees sees ino iso an 0 substituted for 90 do 90 rai ral raisin sliu slig it 4 tal tat amount to 62 jolyn less theol the jurors fees at the close 1 of the argumenti argument court took the matter watter ma ter tinder under HR adf ment meat there arc are two points in tilot which occasion some surprise 1 t hat that the petit aurora ju rora fee iten item admitted to be a fraudulent alff c and the other that even t the lle lie grand pradd aw wages for the day on oil which the tb I 1 1 ment ent wis was found were not ind in la in a the bill co eo that the greal great estan estam possible could be gathered id lil complete scooping of a bornt ou on every conceivable plan beld be I 1 D rule there may or may boi DOI reason to suppose that the S sf amount allowed by government govern sovern menti will not be accepted from that if collected from the defend defendant aV that the sum assessed forced fees tees in th the brala drain case will be rem the fee fiends seem rather too ft 6 in for ibio get money hori you can call but butia ihnot not get monel money the exposition Universe SJ part Culin Cull airell awarded the lill 1111 1 honors to angostura bitters al V most to t the appetite and to keep the di dl or organs I 1 1 1 ans aus in good order ask forthe for tit tic nine article manufactured by v G B siegert sons and bes bew bew imitations imitation s |
