Show STRAIGHT democratic DOCTRINE TH the E supporters of the doctrine of Is a tarifa tariff for revenue have strong grounds for their position apart from f rom the tho vido mido field of argument against protection by the government of private industries it is ia from the constitution that tho the government derives all its authority outside of that instrument congress C hari has no power of taxation on where within its arlicks arti artl cles cies can be loe found any warrant wa irant for the imposition of taxes for tilo purpose of protecting any private industry judge judg e jere bisek bisck when interviewed ed on this question not nob long ago agos declared that congress has no more rag hight right ht to levy jevy a tax on imports than it ha on land beyond what is necessary for the support and maintain ance of the government all beyond that Is robbery this Is ia very strong language huf hue it will be found very difficult to controvert tr expediency is one thing hing an lawyer speaks vy by the tha book boob anil anti ank his bis on this question are straight democratic damoe Damoc ratio raulo dodl doel doctrine trine as well an aa plain enunciations renunciations of plea contained in ID the supreme jaw of the thel tholand theland land and but the ultra effree trade doCtrine which some lerao leruo democrats era cra ta insist upon is impracticable unless iti iki it is made the general rule of all commercial countries reciprocity betge between i an a alj all nations trade traded ye relations lations is ia essential to the lull rull maintenance of free trade by any of them incidental protection is a term which has come com e into use in the discussion of gra gia a tariff for revenue and the principle it expresses beems beams to meet existing requirements exactly the republican policy of a protective tariff hag has for its principal object the protection of private industries which is not warranted by the constitution ution but the democratic policy of a tariff for re revenue venuel Is s such that while aimed at a strictly lawful alj object act it can con be so so arranged as to such home industries as need encouragement without establishing IV and maintaining monopolies herel herein n lies the distinction be tween the policies of the two parties on a question that la Is certain to play a very important part in the th 8 ap political campaign if the democrats Damoc rats do not divide in consequence of the adherence of bome somme impracticable a among them to the ultra dree free trade doctrine they will win have a large advantage over their ad ver ten barles garles on the tariff question except among the great monopolists and those who are interested in the continued support of monopolies at the expense of the great body politic |