Show TH hf LIQUOR t Q ceef JUi jul JUSTICE STICE mckeal N 0 ON i t 1 it delivered eliv bred tred in tho tiara third district caurs SU lak ege city I 1 I 1 f gt isz L atair air I 1 IN 1 t tarch krcil trell i thil thud strict it cort J terai Teral Sn 1874 esparto charles yeemui Yeo mui mai on the tile complaint under tinder oath V u U B Y Hat Haip neton opton the petitioner yeoman was waa wa a warrant warra ra n t taken lefore before I 1 cl Clin n oot oat aw a justice or th tile e peace tried convicted or of selling atin liquore in salt lake olty city without all ali aIl cense sentenced nya ayn nine fine of and to be lle until tile the fine line lie be paid at the rate of one dollar per day case comos comes here on oil a wiit wilt of corpus and the return thereto eto tie tle groff grounds mius lius on off which itrich the petitioner petit peti loner ioner 4 b s counsel asks for foi hij hig his di discharge are considered frn fri the opinion of the court t 1 tt 0 F klind for this thin or Z edw for salt I 1 lmke lawe city nelcean Mcl mei Cean clr cir TJ J ta the petitioner he luada nth arrabe ment with the alty elty whereby thereby ha ivas vas per permitted mattea to id early carly oti on til the e liquor ess with dilt alit filst oly olf a license ceiefor thod that qu on account of dull duli busine sand the scarcity af pf w gney gnes hg jle from time to tj time mey as best lle ile geould ouid cou ld towards tho tha bicente li cente and that lie lle bad had fad paid reon 1 it cloes cloea doea not nou sli ivi pleAr appear piear that it was wag proved before the Awag magistrate istrate sueh stai an arcin annin gement WM um 4 made mattler with wit hithe the city or with any bno au alu to bind thu tho city habip ton belp being present on tile hea hearing ran ri of this court cou rt and arid being heing in P qa cd 1 st stated abed that he lle re otro tibie to egl egi complain 11 of the petitioner rif lly bolth mono mone yand abt obtain huhl buhl a 4 d denied that chat ho lic lind any authority t to bin dihe c etty 1 i y 1 claimed thill chill cly ely aho ad hn hive hate IT ir at all ali aliby alaby by summons s a ra mons hid hed civil netlon action and nott noab by warrant in a quast quasi criminal crimi nal nai ii prose cution t not only ja it bell betl believed eved to ho lio tile the almonor alm ostor quite universal pra oko oke INO lwe for municipal cou color or orlon lon lod irl iri 1 as elass class of caso ease to bmg bag b ing lna t i i A u ja pr 7 11 t i n u I 1 i ii i i auth authorizes brizes it see seo sie bee laa lna laws af of 1872 VIII see sec 2 until legislation tio shall al I 1 repeal or some court of appellate atil ju n abill declare null and void this statute i this thir coure will not disregard it tho pho the petitioner reside sinone one precinct while the justice of the peace beford before whom ho he wm wa tried is in ano another ther aber precinct of the city were this an ordinary civil action the not jurisdiction of bf fhe tho cae ease see S e practice act sec but there is no statute against on ty t y there rens rems is a statute conferring tle tie juri diction exercised in this thia tili case see lassof laws of 1872 chap VII vil A fe few years since an ordinance 0 of t this city required the payment of pei pel year for a i liquor license license aphis court mr justice strickland presiding held that ordinance to be void another ordinance was then ihen adopted 0 opted u under icil jell 1800 1600 per year sear vas was exacted for 4 liquor lih license 1 lil lii iii in ev parte at chisan and mif others that orli ordinance nance was held by this fills court to be bip unreasonable and therefore void there I 1 is now an ordinance under which 1000 per year is s exacted for boruch ucil a licen license e ine lne I 1 me petitioners petition ers tounsel counsel i claims th t the sum now exacted is also unreasonable null nuil and vold void it was shown in ex gex parts mam bans fidd and ahers that an ordinance malit nii g lit ill be reasonable ym in one ono bno city and not in ather the size gize the tho the character and pursuits of adde he denizens tarpons circumstances of tho bulac ular ulan city aud and oven even of the suri rou rounding adi ug coun tryall bear upon pan pin the question of the reasonableness of any ordinance t tun upon any apy subject I 1 courts are invested with authority to declare reasonable or able such ordinances liy lis h a shail s shall hall be called in question guestion although I 1 arnt arn not adaila aware that any other city in tle tie United U tates r demand so mech much aa asi 1000 fol foi A a liquor lic lle license inse Inso yet I 1 can hot not say that under all the circum stan ces djs that sum is too much in salt la lake e oty city at the present time I 1 deem it my duty to dismiss the writ of habeas corpus saud aud and remand the petitioner I 1 1 I 1 i ordered accordingly |