| Show AN ARGUMENT FOR F FROM I 1 loni toni the tenor of chief justice mckeand Mc Keans two letters upon courts in and for counties it will ve be se been seen n that he be evidently wisher itea it toe understood that he has an enormous amo amount of work benore before him in his district so much that he fie Is 19 I 1 1 liard hard pressed for timo time to attend to that part of it which he claims he can transact under the present what ho he terms obstructive state sute of the law how he be would manage to get 0 gli gil 11 with all kinds of business ir if in his yiew view therm there were no such obstructive stae silde of the law every body must conjecture 0 n fon for hims bims himself cir clr but many must think that a number of the cases would be a ion lon long iong 0 time on ori the docket bedore before they were readi reached e d and that the third district court would soon get into a condition similar to that in which the ilie en english i g chancery court used sd to be with accumulated cases before Brou brougham iliam set the fashion of rendering rapid judgments and thus clearing onn oft the musty do docket elet clet some gome cases eases oi on previously dragged through a blodys lifets lifetime ime now nov these implications of b heavy eavy cavy bg business siness and brief time are aro an excellent argument in favoron the extended jurisdiction of the probate courts cou rha rhu if the judge has too mu much ch to do and lie he does seem to signify that he has is it not bad policy on his part to condemn the probate courts for helping him and to prohibit them from touching mouchly a eingle single case that seems a kir kit kind of dog in the manger policy something I 1 at once both very stupid and arid very malicious suppose for instance our overworked chief justice were to change cliance his policy on the benchana ben chand decide that the probate courts might exercise unopposed by him the extended jurisdiction conferred upon them by law and he were to unwise habeas corpus decisions decisions i respect the action of the inferior infer lor courts and in the matter of the cases adjudicated by them sit himself in district court merely to heyraud hear and determine appeals from the probate courts not to deny the jurisdiction of i those courty courts courts bul but ut to affirm or reverse reve rove rs e the their ir decisions as he might fh fairly irly consider hingst in accordance with law and justice then all these obstructions of the law uw and all tb these ese in extricable inextricable em barrass harrass ments mente 11 of which he cpm appa plains would be removed effectually y conflict of jurisdiction would immediately cease his honor would be rell reli relieved eved of the drudgery of a vast amount of adjudication everything judicial would move along as harmoniously as clockwork and the confidence of the people in the courts would soon be completely restored we respectfully commend this simple easy and entirely practical solution of the judicial d difficulty to ous and candid consideration of the chief justice and his hia learned associates |
