Show doings in dougless doug concesa Con resa Tess A most exciting tame pervaded perv the senate today to day growing I 1 out of the he dispute pu te between mes ars pettit and sumner mr pettit said on monday jin in debate he had referred to mr simmers opeil open disavow al of his hia obligations to the Constitution and his oath to support it in no deiy very complimentary terms I 1 in the official report of that debate that senator is represented as having I 1 said as fol cwb I 1 q B said aid 4 I 1 recognize ze no obligations in the constitution to bind me to reduce man to slavery these words said mr air pettit were not said in the senate if the senator had said them they would have been false and I 1 would have noticed them mr sumner I 1 call the senate to order I 1 say they were uttered by me here in the senate mr pettit I 1 trill awill prove move right in b his is teeth that what he says is fal false cries of order order I 1 say he did not m ikebe maker tisa of the remark I 1 liere here reported on abi to floor of this I 1 house but that after the adjournment he went to there and had them aasted into the report import of the debat ehe contended tended that the senator never hail bad the floor to make such remarks and i if they were I 1 nade e in private ate they I 1 ought not to jo go into at i 1 1 sport it is ull unfair idair in any ably senator to thus th us introduce remarks into the deport jpe ports which c were not made in the he then proceeded I 1 admit the right of senators to review their remar als ks and when a I 1 i proof MO I 1 sheet of the debate was handed banded to me I 1 i 4 A the frond fraud end and ordered it to be left lut ut the ohp foreman in p fike the globe office did not do sp I 1 have a letter le ater from the reporter porter stating that this remark did not appear in the snort shorthand hand notes of debate but ahat when mr air sumner called I 1 to review his remarks he had put the in the is shape I 1 it now ow is the senator h had 9 said in aisher answer to the remark that he would not excite the constitution and re no such buch obligation I 1 mr sumner r the remarks were made b by me substantially as reported I 1 made t them in my seat and did nm suppose they would have rea reached clied th the reporters ear the reporter reluctantly showed me the report aud and finding it did not correspond with what whai I 1 said he corrected it as to all ise else 0 which I 1 the he senator from indiana indian has said I 1 hame no reply to make the subject was waa then dropped I 1 I 1 STILL SOBIE j mr butler would like to ask the sena senator tor it congress repealed the fugitive slave law would execute the Cons constina tita lional requirements and send seia back to ta the the S southie South the he abston absconding ding slaves jai sumner do you ask me if ifould I 1 would send back a al slave ave I 1 I 1 I 1 Mr Butler why yes yea mr sumner Is thy servant A a douthat dog that he chov should od do da this thing mr butler here her et he isag esgain is gain in with a quo 0 te already prepared H gets up I 1 here eve I 1 1 and it out with as her he doubtless ess sup poasi I 1 more thin than Demosthene zu elo eloquence quoner and beauty but bui he be is mistaken laughter what have dogs to do with the constitution the Seri senator ator declares arps that he would not exe i cute sworn to support the senator openly declares to do so is ia a h dogs doas duty deity mr puniner recognize no huoh dobli obligations 19 a up Broe mr butler well I 1 suppose it m makes aks but litt little le difference what you consider obligatory upon you |