Show B Y U Champions 1 T 11 r l 7 i t t sr Xi I X f 1 r i 1 s i I Ie l r 1 I f t tV y t 4 f I p pt t 1 J Af Aft V t J Ji 4 t i ti SOH TI J I R CURTIS r II J J f J Winners In the tho Recent Debate With the tho U or of u Once n a month the tho students of the Brigham Young university are oro given the hour usually devoted to 10 theology to make mako use uso of as the they nUL may see 10 fit In the promotion of student boll body affairs Tuesday the they chose to celebrate the ro re recent cent ont victory of the D B y U debating team over cr the champions Of the tho U or of u uTho UThe The Tho program consisted of spirited Im Impromptu impromptu addresses interspersed with college songs and yells yell Ono One Of the tbt 8 recalled that the last which was wai also the first encounter with the state slate university occurred 11 years ago aso nod and took the tho form fonn of t a debate followed by a storytelling contest the D B y V U being awarded the victory In ht both een events b by tho of the court who acted as judges JudgeR Since then although tho attempt has haI often orten been blen made no debate for any kind Of literary contest could be ar arranged arrange ranged range with the U or of U until this year ear QUESTION DISCUSSED The proposition debated last Friday night Is one vitally affecting the tho poll poli politics tics or of America at tho present time It reada Resolved that thaI nil corpora corporations corporations engaged engled In interstate commerce should bo be required to Incorporate un under or federal law It being mutually con celled that such legislation would ho bo constitutional and ant that a federal license shall not be available as an alternative solution the Provo school having the affirmative side AFFIRMATIVE SPEAKERS The first speaker for the affirmative was D R Mitchell or of American Fork Iii Du Mitchell Ditched discussed the tendencY of nil industries toward concentration lot of control and the failure oj of the tho soy gov government eminent thus far to regulate tho ton ten dene dency FollowIng are arc his conclusions Tho results of the 15 to 20 0 years cars of these methods of regulation b by the government go to show that regulation through trust re antimo antimonopoly and interstate commerce nets Is Ion long uncertain inefficient and there therefore fore foro inadequate In the end And again the commission failed e as Corn Com Commissioner missioner Smith of the bureau of cor corporations pointed out last April they mo may Investigate evils olIs due to corporate corporal methods but have havo no po power er to reme remedy them because tho methods or of each cor corporation corporation as m my colleagues c will show are determined to a great extent by bytho bytho tho state creating that thaI corporation an and consequently afford no legitimate work working In ing ground b between t n the and the tho corporate mana managers er The Tho Of this concentration or of control can as my colleagues will show he be over overcome overcome come only b by federal incorporation I have thus thu shown that the tho control of the wealth of our nation Is In the hands of the few and that the present methods or of re regulation lation have havo failed to remedy the evils resulting from lh great centralization or of capital and con control contra tra SE o Tho second affirmative speaker was Charles of Samoa Ho He lIs dis discussed cussed ed I 1 the failure of state stale control over interstate corporations bemuse or of federal Interference and 2 the failure or of state control over oer purely local or state corporations because of over overcapitalization capitalization and of stares I Ito spoke In part as follows From the decisIons of courts It L clear that the federal 1 government can create creale and transportation cor corporations but is III this sufficient 2 Mr u II gu s In his Federal Incorporation law answers Il Is not the combinations combinations of which complaint Los Ls made mado are not only engaged In the foregoing but buton buton on the tho growing mining and or of i in things n and d none e of these I is commerce f I As things i 4 Hots are the corporations do both the tro trading and the tho transportation whIch the tho fc federal government attempts to control It If this be reversed so IO that tho federal government shall control these corpora It would Indirectly control th throwing the rowing growing the tho mining and the or of things How At fI presort nt the states the conditions un tIer der which their own corporations shall operate e c g to 10 Or prohibit them to db Interstate The right or of the state to enforce this power 1 does docs not Co 10 In the tho fact that It hn has any ony control In the tho of sphere interstate com commerce merce but purely purel It has full power over Its own corporations This right or of regulation and control would all pass to the tho genera government where hero It manifestly belongs were cor corporations compelled to do bU I ns un der federal law THIRD SP n rho fhe third affirmative speaker WM was CurtIs Larson of Pleasant Grove Groe Be lIl cussed tho following I 1 The federal government control interstate commerce unless it II creates the corporations engaged there In Owing to the diversity of stat stale Incorporation laws Interstate commerce Is not regulated a 3 The Tho incorporation laws or of the states sates are arc lax lx hence neither the eor cor nor its commerce Is properly regulated but bul both bolh would ho bo under 1 aa f stringent yet et equitable federal carport tion law I Ir Mr r Tr Larson on closed as follows Under existing conditions our feil oral government Is lop lopping pin ref surface portions of our industrial cancer In instead st stead d of getting nt at It its II roots hat wo we need Is n a federal law fJ e which shall bo be fair anti equitable amt an any y yet l stringent ont enough to the resulting from our OUI lax state laws What We went Is a 3 law whIch shall b ha designed for the or of the entire coun country t 1 instead of for fora theo thoo a or of individual tate state Judge Gross up says The Tha day or of the tho New cw Jersey policy I is gone one the tho New York I policy and the Iowa day has policy polley come for an American corporate |