Show WIH CASK The te ent setting aside ad of th tit tha verdict ver verdict dict of or the lower loner court In the are of Sharp i vs I s the Pacific sal com company peony pany I Ip Ii n s great disappointment t to 10 the general public A Aim reported In om our columns Olumn on Nov Noy Mh Judge Judg San bord at lit St Paul handed down the decision The rhe of the II case as all printed In the papers however I Is probably ml mill from being el too loo brief Pos POI y too th tee plaintiff mistook lilt his remedy and brought the action for lor the wrung wrong cause conspiracy e Y and aced against the wrong parties partiN Mr Sharp a Halt Luke coal con I defier u charged that there was wal a n conspiracy to drive him hint out of business and obtained Judgment aggregating against the Union Coal COllI company comp n the Union Pacific Hallway company th the Oregon abort lArte J M Moore and Buckingham This The h rants facts fae were ere that thai In 1888 1189 the rail railroad railroad road roada of the th wet eat made n a storage rut rote for hauling which went Into effect In Inthe Inthe the spring of 1907 This pro for 1 v reduction of 10 cents a 11 ton tonto tonto tonto to the whales h le ita on the part of the railroads and In ht return for title till Von Jon colon the Ih dealers agreed not to raise ral e the price of the supply that was not In the fall tall there was W J to toa be bea a refund of oC W cent centa a tote ton made by tha the railroads Il Sharp made maae an nn immediate reduction In it prices price and them their Th rh The railroad foiled failed to haul any all more coal 1111 tar for Sharp and the coal loul company through J Al Ai Moore its 1111 agent railed Jailed to till fill Ht It orders order It II was waa alleged that ours elite of coal t belonging to 10 him were diverted nod never nevor sharp wa was waif forced fOre out of or business s sNow Now if we understand this thle summary 1 of ot the case CdO Sharp did exactly lX what whet the UI people delre d every 01 man mal In III bu business to doto sal loll nt lit the low lowest en rate possible pos and to give the public the benefit I nent of at any cheaper processes of production that Hint he ha Is II ablo able to secure This ThU is In the till I meaning of ot competition And this thin i la I the only kind of at competition competitor that Is III of ot any Rny ore ure to 10 the general public Corn Com Competition petition that morely merely trade trad and UIt results in 11 combinations combination to maintain or to advance prices lIne is III a of no bonum to o 0 the tho public The Pie court held that titer there ua na a IM to sub u of any aliT combination between any two t of the either to refuse fulI to 10 sell coal to Stoup Sharp or er r to tc reft reI to transport It for him And w we have no doubt that this u Is I when a Il roii charges charge con h he be must prove It Jl fully full in order to get 1 judgment lIt Th The court i la right In III holding that a alue lue l I company d In mining nod and selling Ii its oral I is not cut prohibit I by the tho anil antitrust set act or by wy the taw law I 1 from corn re te to 10 sell HII ii Ita It coal I from lu its It c ui 11 m ni Axing the price and unU Lanus on urs which It will wI wt U Ita it products product or r rum Ill selling to I different und and nn ul different tame 10 Nu I 1 when h the th court coon ask A vio violation lation of u a law hw by br u Ii corio dOW dose not nol render it II 1 I mg stock stockholder holder liable Ui r Jo o sill bv b taken to the proK M 4 llon 11 lot loi I fJ II It I the U U la 2 tiler the lile report rt of la the caw av I how I thit not lIot only did UM the U boot Un Pacific t I oal MII refuse to sell I Ial cal al to 10 Sharp which hI a local IO AI ha haa a B tight to do I but that UMI Haan I mon P railway cora ny r fiu Ki Kiin in I haul huu iI t rp rolla coal it a that a e 01 poI en n lw hII In g a is II I nn right ria hi to I make makr It Ix jua UM herr here that ive as f lits Ilk II published summary II III nf of I I Ih In are IKS t I it Iu III t upper III ii es M li h lulu iw a public aldr HIT r In lu lutu IMi tu I hi i im ax UM Ili I h i r 1111 could 11 ius Ills 11 I 1 do du d III Ih the thing It li U Is IIII I In II I under I Ih law luw I I haul IulI i II hi I doh 1111 an lI H rl offend I r li I I I h i 11 II 11 it 1 i u U I i ill i ill I K get 11 I 1 iwi i 1 II i ih lIh iu Ill d dor or 0 all au n vibe ob should l be IN aJ bill abl U to this Uit c illy lay lly and plat III ht the till Muir Ir from g gelling ml ual 1 Ml al a an anIo mum I its M Mi s Io i laud 1 rat at then Hun Ih III the present It un uJ ul 1 rr Mr r tiM 1 i i 1 It If ck il ilMi 1 Mi li h ItI i 1 will Mill III wr t It M t M OH 11 i to tr trI toI I ill III Ii t tin Ili h levi Ir 4 mil r ri i nn 11 I I 5 n lh Ih i d dito I III II it M w u lm dat land t 11 at till this I la the rash r 1 of ut k ij pin ng m Ili II imilie It i ut of f awl outil I at al II I lie al high hurh Iu fi r lit It iii s tit thi tall made d iM ld Ilot an bal itu so mu III li It ht to I hum haul hair ht frum lite IIII KIWI has I TI it truth tram nl tilts till In hUll I L ri At w HI arc not di 11 II I MI s il d 1 tu to I it lint 11 lu III III t UI make M wItt I n nw net 1141 assar w Nut But ii wen n if Ir It u ill hI not tuil h hIhl hale i tub tills effa rr I tin the II l people a at i lumly laal ly n h hulled 1111 l tu lu i tup lu i j Irl rots n a I n M 1 1111 1 i Ite ve i aJI i I i 1 vii wh ahw w l lI o in to ut tv using c Una per fu rJ reel l 1 should continue their efforts Til The I Industrial of en n place Is III s It ee retarded by b hl hJ II d furl fuel |