| Show AG AGREEMENT T VOID VOIDS S SAYS r T THE CO COO T Mrs Dell Sold Salt Dower flower Rights HI in Iii Husbands Estate EstaLe for forA forA or orA A Song Sane FORMER DEGREE DECREE IS AFFIRMED Arrangement Was as s Against Public Policy and itU Unfair and andI Inequitable I a I table Tho The decree of ot tho the lower court In tho the matter of ot tho the estate of ot nell Hell de tie which allowed Mrs aIrs Klan HUon H It Quinn Hell Uell of ot her hor husbands estate e tato hits has beets been l by tho ho au su pronto promo court In III on nn written by Justice Strap and concurred In by b Chief Justice anti ami an Justice Me Mc McCarty Carty Franklin Jl t Bell Dell executor of ot Ito tho estate asked for tor a n decree of at die dis distribution etl In iii the lower court distributing ing tho estate to the tho children of or de tie censed ceased when lien Mr Mrs hell Boll a Cl pro protest protest test tent and an that she sho ho bo ho awarded her Interest In tho the same The Tho executor oxe claimed that Mrs MrsHall Irs Hall HolI In consideration of ot the lie payment of ot had relinquished hr her Interest In the estate and hence eh sh shill was ln not entitled to anything It appears that lIce tho children of ot deceased wore were ero ery very anxious to get their stepmother from their homo home and finally Induced her hor to leave leavo also alo to agree to Met lot Mr Dell Boll get got a II divorce tram front her with without out u a contest and to relinquish her dower etower rights In lib hIs hl estate for tor It U was shown that the total value Rlue at the estate was vius ln about 1000 The Tho lower court held that the Iho agreement entered Into was void olet ns as being against public PolicY polle This decision la is affirmed by hy the su supreme supreme supreme preme court which holds baltic that such mich an nn agreement made In furtherance of ot nn an action for tor divorce Is I clearly clearl agaInst t public nubile policy and hence void volel antI and fur tur titer ther the tho payment of ot 25 to Mrs Dell I for tor a 1 of or her ler dower IH Is l Isso i so o inadequate an test to render the thc trans transaction action net Ion unjust unfair ul and nd Inequitable Arraigned for rOl fo Horse I Two prisoners were before betor Judge Armstrong yesterday afternoon I both upon tho the charge of ot horse hor e stealing They Vera both given until Thursday to plead lell l Hobert T I Clark III rk ls Is charged with n R ten team in of ot hUrteR horses and a n buckboard front from Albert C Goodwin of ot l lt Ft t Douglas on Jon Ja P 1903 J W tv tins hUll two charges of ot horse hone stealing Bleating against him hint He lIe lb is ts charged with one horse hore trout from E R J J Price and another front from rom Kennedy on F Feb b 9 II 1905 1903 |