| Show THAT LOGAN JOrAN I nIB I In part of thIs thU ot or the tho will II bo he found a m r letter leller from Irom mm to LO tolan lan In ht 11 reference to the tho folio tubo report of ot ono omo rt main by Elder Eider Jonathan O G Kimball at nt that place on Jan ami 1005 IDO It Jt Is by a 11 number num number number ber of ot prominent bu lne s then men who It as a 1 fair and correct nIH of Elder on that We have already referred to tor r the tho which wore published In inthe tho the Snit Salt Lake Tribune of ot Tuesday con am corning tho and their publication cation In other papers papera through being I transmitted by tho the As It was Ivan WI on ACcount of ot tho the wide circulation given Riven to 10 tho the libel that wo WI have bestow bestowed S ed ell upon It no so much attention It Jl lm hu has hasi i appeared In a n number of ot 1 l In er eaRl enet nud west wot which probably will fall to give gle tho lh correction corr furnished by Rider Elder Kimball Another also from Irom Ix Ran tho the course of tho the Trl bone buno In relation to thin matter and conclude with Tho Tin re fe r pout pott of ot the tho Is II false In III letter and and We ore are Informed on nn BOW goal authority that the tho person vcr on who i tent Font that hut report tho thin correct neat of 01 the tM which we now pub publish lish and nd wilch v Ich corroborates the tho Mato that linn hoe appeared over Eider signature ture Thin preacher who went tent the rei rel report oit to the wa 11 lira told al alga nIHil o admitted tint that ho In jested 1 the word wont polygamy Into the tho I i article nn 1111 It IM hi hla Interpretation of what Brother Drother meant It very clear nod mid certain I that Instead Ins lend of or the cornea COrteS i I reporting what Claw l 1111 v Nan nil anti Kimball j Bald alII Ul he ho gave ERVO his own 1011 and Interpretation of QI what he ha pretended d they meant ileum It In 18 Innot not the tho time that Dili 1 of th lh flu Clo lopel iota matters l to 10 m lie JIo has been sory ry kindly treated by hy B H nine In I Lagoa but has lina not only on nn ocon ocoa don Ion but bul on a 1 n ko koIn In the tho the llio sent Kent to tn the Tribune ant lilted lit tah 1 In hr to the purpose of or that Jr hldi IM III to 10 tin tho public and tim Iho y und particularly the lie nt nl j RK lu t tho the Mormon Marmon Church which hl h It II In Is In III I mr The nt lit attempt tempt made by h Eller 1 It r to a n correction fn rl lIn m that Ihl l nod to tn havo It t plane 1111 him right hero tho the Imbue Jublle received 1 the usual treat treatment ment accorded A by b jt It t to every Mor non loon who hn has hll endeavored 1 to Induce It II to not act fairly Irly and decently decent That Tat paper t a n lIlle of or direct and Intentional a purporting p to bo be ie re made by IW In u a pad and when whon appealed to for tor torn fora n a retraction It responded In III Its It II am CUll tomary mean anion and contemptible way Wl by and end ribald with the I r evident purpose purport of oC making m the th Injury still greater Rr iter w AVo Wo have given this lr p too oo j mud much attention and spare II Thin Thie would certainly h Iii be no ao IW It If the libel written by hy bythe hythe the preacher r and IUd by h the pa paper paI m t I per had been lieen I to thoe thore disreputable I I table It In III he vue the faire falio have been Rent cent over the l find end nd In bl journals Journal t that vo WI ha have devoted ao 10 o much space pare pareto to It Not only ha hll had the dispatch been beell widely Idely punted printed hut but comments COin men III unfavorable or able to the tho Church and ami to 10 alleged w s V t t attitude towards the tha huo havo t I appeared and of It tt Is II very 01 tIlt dif difficult to obtain a n n of there ml pre The Tho people P here herer I r however arc rapidly obtaining a proper of ot tho the duplicity I and utter unreliability of ot the tb paper that In la re ro for the wrong |
