Show TUB fUG AP Bom time a ago aco o It i was w n tl e l that no rio Ion longer are It satisfied with the Darwinian theory of ot tin lisa u origin of ot specie Now a contributor to the Chicago takes take up that and points out that thaL dirr differ r ont oat generally depend upon dif different dl ferent terent Interpretations interpretation placed upon tipoti facts known and admitted It Is I easy y he heay says ay to very ery different mean meanIngs meanIng loge Ings from tye name ta ls and Mid to find Ind tales falee from f n a limited number of ot facts CactI throughout the entire litera liters literature ture tur of ot evolution ov tOl There Is ii I almost al o t nothing final out rie e Wery phase of ot lit J t t Interrelations and this thle will continue to be to to so This conclusion Is II Justin l by hy th the very vry theory of oe evolution itself Our author Is IB particularly emphatic In tit his bla protest protect against the tall theory theo Ho He th tha prop of ot that the rudimentary tary tall tail of ot man I is II an Irrefutable proof of ot the fact tact that he Is I descended de from Cram tailed ancestors He Us Illustrated hi hit his by b the evolution of or the typewriter If It he h says ayl any ny one anI of nt these thee th scientists will go 10 to 10 an in exhibition of at typewriting machines machine he h will wm we ee e In Indubitable Indubitable dubitable proofs of ot the evolution of ot that u useful ful article In each of t the lint Ant tem been Invented hn hll will note a mechanical oat cal principle In the next dosen 4 In the ascending scale ecale he will And lind that prin principle principle ciple repeated exactly In lit five or six Ix cases c anti and modified In others In Th the third down Joson of at the ascending series he will find new principles of ot more Im lm Importance or the original mechanical al principle eliminated and superseded by another Thus Thul we And linet vestiges vU and rudimentary structures 0 tu somewhere IO along the tile line In the evolution of ot every mechanism Now Nor No I 1 wish to ask uk It If this prove proves that one erie on machine rave gave birth to toor toor toor or caused to exist the nest Mt machine machin In III Inthe Inthe the tb scale cale The TIle question he ho answers allera In the U neg nog negative and nd continues continue Compare the lb physical organisms of ot ofA otman A man and an ape aPt suit anil ani there Ule scenic em II to tobo tobo tobe bo be munh reason raon r n in the Darwinian the theory ory 07 01 that man Is ii I descended from a B hairy tailed talle quadruped probably ar er arboreal boreal horsed In It Us Its It II habits habit However those thoss who believe this theory theor have compared only the lbs physical p organisms The very Yel moment that the attempt It Is m med de d to compare an ape with a man as II In Individual 1 entitle entities taking Inking Into their whole whal natures nature then the theory theo r utterly rl falls fall The two t YO species too radically In their p Identities ties th The he be distinction between man JIn and Tie he animal Is t the absolutely impasse Impassable hIe ble guit of rational and an 1 moral felt her apes nor natural selection ever human bl g H The TIle sImIlarity can OIn be De we vs nIre Ire ore told much more mere satisfactorily ac ae accounted counted for by assuming that God or nature the tile name make mac no difference ha hu t d some of ot the same materials In various varlo combinations to create or te every enry that exists The Th same sante or runic and mechanical are re nt r tlell orated d over again tn lu in various species l hut but that tact fact does not n prove that one ono ever produced another and dif different di ferent species specie H It simply proves that the life teresa force of nature are art proceeding 1 on established lines line II nell with variations more or less Ie efficient In accordance I with the Ih general tendency of ot progress Ie It la I a K r question upon which science ICI certainly ha hal not spoken Its III lot last w I HIstory a is II tar far as U It Ita Is testimony I the ape ap theory As u we turn t MI Its It page agea and Ind note noto the of 01 the thenIce I rare nIce we do not tind Orad a II dr de d scale toward the animal kingdom We Wa notice noU e names such luch as All I Galileo find und ISAAC l ae Newton Luther h Paul Plato crates Solon Solomon Ropon Ih vii M Mom Abraham Noah No io matter r hov hv fir hr r buck bak k we e follow rollow the baten b o len lath juith nth of t f history hl torr there theN i is 11 no trace of Dt o an on animal ancestry And even t buck bank of ot ld d history hl or man IlIan bee 1 raised his eternal monuments that testify t to lofty lotty gen lug luu aspirations aspiration or nil fir hI from thu 1111 Intellectual sphere of ot keys koy kl as U heaven h Is 1 rim tarth cArth HI Ills torr tory 1 I is decidedly the tho ape 1110 the tha theory tI I ory v iD r |