Show I STAND SIMm HY BY B THE LAW LAS IA WI WIThe i I The Deseret D seret News Ne has s stated repeat repeatedly 1 edly that the tho ordinance which was ski IH decapitated In the City CILy Council on n Mon Monday ton on r v t t day Ilay nIght needed needer amendment and that wherein It appeared to give the Mayor Mayorg g authority as 8 to appointments without the tho concurrence of oC the City Council It ItI was faulty Hut But n a few tel verbal changes chouses I ft t t would have h o easily remedied rem letl the tho apparent l ent wrong Tho The News stands today tor for forthe j the tho rights ot of the tho council just where wh re It 11 has hall always stood as ns well veil as for tor the rights of at the tho Mayor It would not have 1 t either cither of them Infringed The rite appoint appointing I I i ing power ot of tho the Mayor Maor In Is undoubted but It Is to Iv l b made mado effective by tho the thol l advice and consent content ot of tho the City Council i I I That Is all wo we have contended for tor In Inthis ini i this connection at any nn time Wn Wo o main maintain Inn In If I tain ahi It now Hut the tho Initiative must t be betaken betaken taken by tho the Mayor Maor f m The Tho council line has no lawful right to tomake torR I f rR make appointments and present them to tho the Mayor for tOt his hi approval nor to say sayto l 3 to that officer you OU may InA make mako such and andi i il I such selections and It If you dont we I I d I will balk you OU and resist all nil you ou attempt to do This courso course Is III recommended recommended mended mendell and Instated insisted upon hy by h the tho organ of oC the Iho faction that Is blocking the way VIlY l to an equitable settlement ot of the tho pres present f ent out dispute dl pule and which demands that the tho Mayor shall stop atop exercising the to right and duty duly Imposed upon him by byI I f lax lav relating to this matter Tho Mayor has made mado no hO raids upon tho the council nor Interfered il with Its lis rights In any particular i t 1 ular If It any An proposition has hall been i I made by hy a n member or of ot that Ai I body which would curtail the lawful tit J j j I growers of oC the tho council It should be voted otell t down or expunged That Is our position i lion tion today to and always has been Let 1 W 1 every eory public lal bo ho sustained In Inthe Ini inthe i i the tho exercise of oC his lawful authority Just that and nothing more moro It would I t J bo ho a I very easy CAS matter flatter to settle tho the dir dif difficulties In view It If tho the public welfare i I Instead ot of private schemes sch and fac taco factional I I advantage were subordinated to toj toJ f j J tho the Interests of oC this l J Since the tho foregoing tore was In typo our ourI I 1 attention him has been heen called to an attempt it E of ot tho the Snit Halt Luke Tribune to snake inako out that The Tho News NeaM Reverses Itself the Tho J L effort Is a a n miserable failure In the tho thoI I Isolated passages arc are picked Jl I out of or News editorials without Urn tim d dI I ox context In tho the second place remarks ot of tho the lt itself elf substituted for tOI ewe Nol paragraphs I and in each ench Instance a direct falsehood Is told by hy tho Tribune In order to es establish e nn on apparent contradiction In Inthe Inthe the tho third 0 thero there Is not lIot the tho slight slightest est eat st between the position of ot the tho Notes correctly stated staled 1 at lit former times Unit which it occupies o il 1 Vo 0 stand silent for tor tho the right of ot the tho Mayor nor norto to appoint by b and with the tho advice i I and consent of ot I he the City Cily Council Wo we Wolo Woj welo j lo not and never did clean claim that ho cnn J or should do so without that concur race rente Vo 0 never MYOr claimed us till the rl I uno ono did lilli that tho the Council had no other I prerogative hut but to do what tho the Mayor I i dictated u 0 endorse and repent repeat 1 nil 1111 I that this paper uttered editorially on onti 1 l ti this question In 1903 and that It ItIs ItIs to Is III In perfect accord with wilt what wo 0 have hlo m said ahl oil o this hue subject In 1904 j Wo We 1110 not surprised tint tho the ono lino ha had Interpolated Us its own comments I f ns na n a parallel to garbled quota I l I Ions from our OUI columns as all its 1111 R adoption II of ot and untruthful too Ino ties In order to misrepresent nn hn m out ant Is hI very cr wide widely notorious Jut Hut how III i It must Itself for tor Its lis own il tl contemptible I |