| Show are speaking JI of or Insurance agaInst strikes The T Is II made by Mr AIr Ir Parry nt of ot the Nation National al ci and anti U Is likely to be taken liken up There I Is ctr certainly no reason reaton r why h employers should nut I inure Insure Ih lv against that kind kindor of or to lees a n as well sheLl HI to A against again least lews by b lire explosion Hood accidents antI and dishon e est ix of or employee It can call al also lo U 1 said that Were went employers employer thus thui secured would In all probability be lees lea I 1 ukI b be no Ito object In declaring 14 4 I when cessation of ot work did dd not mean a n heavy lot los Iou to the If 1 t I employer because been Ule the very verr object of n a astrike strike e In itt lo to compel hint him by the loss ho In to come to terms Hut such HI In li Is I nevertheless not th the remedy against labor troubles It be become count come employers employ r would natural naturally ly IV become lees I H conciliatory tOr than ever cr toward their They The would icel ltd II that they the were In iii a n position to Iff tl tiara mire nil 1111 overtures Then Insurance strikes would be no tnt protection to 0 the party part that always Is l made the tho Innocent er when labor hilOr disputes are on It would not cover tho the oss of or orthe the thin general public On Ost thu contrary the public would be he made to pay lin both I I tho the Insurance and the cost CDS I of ot lug InK It II What Is mostly needed IH Its n measure that will 1111 protect the public e And alloh n a measure Is III compulsory f ar lira lion by IJ which strikes lIe ate render rendered r ed eel unnecessary |
