Show I I Suit Still tiled riled nt o lant l aly I vT cot t a Defendant no A suit was 10 In tie the Third district court court at t on Saturday against the W le Bell lIell Ining U ij company the heing Ms MI Mary Stacy Carroll wid widow widow ow OIl of t John J C Cit toll roll The Tho compon M S liter Mer ter company Solon individually ally ullY and us no trustee for tor the company are also mentioned as OH a If defend defendants unto ants The grounds upon which plaintiff re reo relies relies lies lee for tor relief nrc ore that the tho properties In dispute were unlawfully cold nold at nt a II pre pretended tended elided trustees sate nale and con irregularly transferred to 10 the Little Utile lIeu licit company It Is I alleged that on onNo Nov Not No 20 1890 John J S Carroll was the owner osner of the claim 1000 1010 feet In the Horn ibm of ot the tho lulls Hills 11 ilia GOO feet teet In III the John Mackay tOo 00 feet In Inthe inthe the Crappy Cropp hay Boy and amI ISO feet fuel In time the Ih Par Parnell nell neil claims On that day which was waa shortly before his hla death Carroll Carroli con conveyed conveyed tho the properties named lo to Mary Carroll his wife and who up to 10 a short time ago ngo thought she ho was waR tho the owner osner of ot them In September 1191 1911 however Carroll gave a n trust deed deell to Solon Spiro to se M secure cure u It note executed In favor of ot M S SA A for the deed covering nil on the Iho property mentioned with the ex cx of ot n a Interest In the claim On Dec D 9 of at the same came year car Carroll gave another trust deed covering tho the remaining half halt of at the Min Mm to to secure a note In Inthe Inthe the tho favor for tor It Is it l then alleged that Mrs Carroll was allowed credit and goods at the tha store from tram time to time anti and andIn In tn small mall amounts with the understand understanding ing ina on her part nt at least t that she aho was still the owner of ot the property conveyed to 10 her hr by her husband and that someday some Bome dRY day Its lie sale would be effected and that hE would then be attIc able to 10 discharge he mem obligations to the tho Ashheim com con DaIly It 1 la IR further alleged II that she sho know I now no 00 different until t when her credit was waa cut cul off ot and ond she he was ln told that she did dit not own the ground Mrs Mr Carrolls attorneys are arc now pow ask asking askIn askIng I ing In that the trustees sale of the prop property property erty tr be I e set n for fol the tho reason renson that It ItIs ItIs Itis Is void old |