Show I ll COUnT gURL no ITO Rf REVIEW CASE S tied Sued hy Judge Judg in h hA A t l with of o Jesse C Little 1 I FURTHER IS STOPPED 1 j I II I CnE Js Is one In in Which Judgment gI ent Was Wasi Va i II by t Default lilt in J Tanners Court I J jo f today OIt u 1 In III t dl loUTt fOr r a II writ wIt ot of w r A A 0 C and judge II IL U J Tanner lanner nf th Ih the city ro rIn which It f naked that th the pro proceeding taken in III the city olty court in 11 case cale F A C McUan t the etl herein t U r d by hy the tho high higher er c cl urt rt lower court be ie re maIDe from taking further h r action In tM In 11 the ther cise r iJ rJ petition alleges allegO trip tu com cam Aai wai AM against s In InJustice Justice Juth IC egeM cb tt on Oct Ocl T 7 1001 brought to recover 43 13 ana In l on a IL promissory note dated June B 1001 lei the sum um of at tO 40 which was paul paid on Pit fl the Petitioner allowed the tha to 10 go by default and default Judgment was rendered hint hIn on Nov il for f r and raUs amounting to 3 Mr Little was wai unaware that judgment for tor or such an un mount amount as ns S the th Ih had been rendered him until lIP Ji was cited i appear r before beoo Judge I Tanner on ug g 10 1003 I 03 for tor ex ox examination on II Inga ingi In Ho Ito filed a motion nOtton to quash tho ho citation tl h and to set net aside tho the Judgment jud ment In 10 excess oC o the amount named In the summons but tile the court denied hU his mo ma motion maion ion tion Ito He aku therefore that thai the pro oio In the cane l lie by byth bythe the th hIther higher court A tIt t of it t review wa by Judge Judie |