Show WilY WHY DO EH WAGES t he hI for or Their heir Ecu Jw Position It 11 would seem set superfluous to ask why wll women Are me wage earners But nul there thoro Is never a n day that somewhere In hr this broad hr land a n preacher n 1 n II or n a college colleg professor lOCH floes not nol discourse on the tho earling woman as though she were erl n a i perverse creature Indulging hor her lung nl at conventions and In consequence up upsetting upsetting setting things masculine In a n way ln that thatIs Is not only hard hare for tor tho the Individual man worker to bear b bl which Is III also al o sub subversive er lo o of ot fundamental props of ot tho the good gnarl old time Whoso Whose mutt fault is III it II that A A the tho woman works If It It be a I crime or ora orn ora a n wrong she is guiltless guiltiest for tor mans laws soy SO she not take her own on and ant anther her only choice holce I Is III between that or en Ill engaging In painful gainful occupation She works because her father was or Is l In III Incompetent Incompetent competent or a drunkard or unthrifty or what Is III known knowlI as nil u a poor business businessman man or because became he married whet he should not have hal done donelO vo so or along with fellowmen hp he curled carted tim the home Indus Industries Industries tries out of ot the homo home and rondo made them the of ot great factories In the tho thelast thelast last analysis It ll wll wIl tx bt found that it Is always man who is to lie be blamed If I any anyone anyone one should b be J censured for tor this latter hatter day dA entering of ot women Into pursuits which inin have labelled strictly man mae For one no thing the fathers of ot earners are never naver concerned about whether or not alit the business s sIlo possibility Ilo MR ls III pre nr the only consideration with them being how It will pay pai The father will n Im m with the mourning of ot his hili own oln craft over oer tr th the inroad of o wo women men but bul the th woes of o men Irs eta vr and bookkeepers from the tho same name sour draw from frail him not n It throb of or sympathy If It hl his hili daughter run ran but hut make a 1 comfortable livelihood In that thaI If Is the extent to 10 their Interest him Lusth I th min man minIs manIS Is III In ninety eases rases out of o a hundred her employer The persistency with which men till nit lets Ills Insist upon UI the Wage u as an In Inexplicable in nn inis is J a discreditable reflection on tin ir common rommon sense Since the workers worker 1 everywhere In hI evidence there therl Is 18 no dlf In observing many man varieties of ot her T majority of f women wags wag ag earners give every nr Indication Ind of the Ih victims of or advert anti ami only the rodent f n 1 conceive that bill t ml of women would IU hI toll tall In mills mill and atone through rs heat heal when tr trees M sod nd Ild no flower er woods wood and R n l s n a Cllon to holiday making or that in the bitter blUr weather of mid midwinter winter they would brave breve bra the terrors Itt f t for tor less vital reason than th n t to i keep kNOP body bod end and soul toul This eternal t discussion oo of ot th the ware wage earner te Y I a problem It le simply Imply imbecile Imbecile She Is le not a II problem nor a II p pen rv nor anything other ta than n thu tho result tault of ot e t R 4 n social evolution 11 Ion set APt In motion motton and maintained by b molt man himself who rite pits Its up as ns Is I his wont lont and OH as a deplorable h what Is In ht null reali reality ty t t an Inevitable result It Is la about time limo the preacher and the workingman Inveighing against the wage earning woman It U Is li as all futile as os It Is eilly Vogue I |