| Show OBJECTS O TO DISCRIMINATION TION To the Editor To nn an Intelligent person tending reading time the time the last te w t anti ond reports of ot the time re lbS tM senate c on the th rOOd food bill till u It i would look ns nil tt etc I of baking ln the state of Utah were nere a lot rind and were to rob th by imposing Im ln on om them l it unfit to td till eat tillon eaton on behalf ot at time the h m of this we wc e ti o j enter our pretest prote t lIuch c and nn 1 time the which la is betas ku HR against ln t u uTha uThe The Tha ht only objection we WI have hap entered the tho food bill U Ir Un hrU n U cUu III 14 n Uch gives the i food foot the If Ie he felt so to lii tl against OU product In tamo of ot another which would be bo and all nil we 0 wish is III that the food OI duty shall shah be fully defined ns its the home bottle manufacturer hirer should receive the tho same Ram treat treatment treatment ment as nil those tho lit III from east eastern Mr Ir Helner ern em rind and f t wM and Mr Love seeing the Justice In this thU said they wore were milling to eliminate the clause The Tho morning papers como come out anti ana say that IhM strenuous efforts were mad mado to get the thc manufacturers before the senate but ott they were to 10 appear which Is ridiculous amid aud en uncalled d for tor The fur Justice of oC our position being apparent made It un unnecessary necessary nry for our appearance and we I protest against such Ruch language being used against the manufacturers of baking powder In time the State of at Utah for we claim III 1 can lall demonstrate tho the fact that the powders made mado In lii thin state mate are lust UH oat healthful anti n mm good deal purer than thoM that are aro Imported sold at nt a 1 higher price amid wo rye are perfectly milling that the demit anI home pass a n law late demand demanding log ing that all aU baking r manufactured In rind iU also o Imported lot Into title this Ihl state shall lh lI Have lIn th their h formulas printed In large loiters letters on the labels IMbel but we WC do rho hea tIly making the lime In III so 10 o label their rood goode and find not 1101 mulling making time thu imported linking powder manufacturers unfit print In conclusion we CAnnot see Ie why wh trIm baking powder lowder should be hI singled out for Cor attack In preference to 10 other Why not make time the law uniform and have all food tood pro product duct duet manufacturer print their formula so people can cami e ee e what whal they are ate using rising 0 II H HEWLETT lIE te |
