Show EREST IN HOUSE PROCEEDINGS Jin JI attendance I I today was faS nn an ovi eyl ovir n I 1 th h l hii bl nn ill Interest In the pro Ir r If It Iii g mi ti wh h tre re to tn take lake place upon rs MM Iti fV the of the thu theu th h H ir V Hi fw tor n ii period of ot t ui ut u t 1 I OI unusually large number i S J ulU laly I rn w I i re P oi the tho und and the 1 1 n TI i iI were acre in their M Af I Ill Illi I transaction tun of some i t I can imir i I i i U Vi i if liI H Mi Mr MI of or off orI I f i nur n nt It t r i I i on 01 rules pre i V I d I p mil ii supplemental to toh tot h t HOT o t H i 1111 directing the lor ij PC P e c u m T 1110 arid and andin ih t in m t the coat coal ii I i 1 it rn r sd i authorized sub 11 s of 01 th t he committee to take t k it At 1 was a lot t 1 of from tho ho cir i If lift 1 1 then presented the tue ift fr c am a III I i Ilk li hi i of the k C i 1 r T nil W it 1 provides for the them m VV tl iIiI Ion of the bill bil with wih Ir r f I Ii P I ui s debate at III the V 1 ih previous question Ii I c o i i 1 1 I ns as lS ordered with ui In i 1 i in mt Hun Ij n Twenty ruIn min minH tit H t iv i allowed Ilowe upon the theu ii u M I P i e reviewing r th thi the then i tV n i IJ lt t t duty lOt on coal cal i 1 i F i 1 ii ii no defense i i the existing I N i 1 M h g said laid ld he bt did didi I i IM 1 V Its pur purt vu r rC t C li P I i i l b I l It would wout In r f r in ILl it 11 of a 1 single BIngle BIngler I I 1 U t 1 1 sn a he h that thai any ony h 1 r V V rt I i f p HIP Ilp greed and StIl Iud nv as 1 re f b m MI n i ts s who ho are lr tak take taki IK il h t tg i i t Ih hi already tready oppressed people hut It I will wl Ill satisfy n a public sen set und nail show the thu dIsposition of or Congress to do 10 everything In Its Is power poser to relieve the situation n t Mr Mt lelo Mondell of Wyoming ornIng wild tho the lull bill 11 would 11 injuriously affect the COB coal caRl Indus woul tn tl of lila his hil state In of the northwest In competition generally by y and in it view of or the stated I a tel belief of Mr 11 Mondell that the bill bil will wi gIve no re rc relief lief lef he lie n nake k d If I th tb committee would Oll not consIder the question of reducing tho period of Its operations o to six months Mr Mt fold 1 the proposition rollo had been I considered but because of the im ImPOssIbIlitY POssIbIlitY of ot tore the future of the coal coul cal It I haul not nt been bOon adopted Mr 11 of Tennessee celled caJOl o attention to the fact that the tue rule pre pu prevented pi vented all al Uty of amendment and he protested against such uch Illch a course In ln such luth a n crisis crl IB lr said paid when the stress of ot cl came there were wre a ci t recourse to Democrat Democratic t tIc ic to doctrine Mr Ir Williams of Mississippi 1 who followed fol followed followed lowed Mr Ir Richardson contended that the of the duties ditties Inte must result In reducing tho the twIce price of or coal cant cantIn In concluding the tho debate upon the rule lule Mr 11 l l Hell that the Ihl by h of tim other side Aillo was ns apparent from the th remarks of Mr The rhe opposition lie las said Mid was simply politics e The Tue Democratic per pl t attil I dishonor bill hi had hall contained a I duty on coal 1011 A rising vote upon the tho adoption of the rule resulted Ayes noes 10 a party the exception of ot Mr Perkins bran N Y and Mr 11 GaInes atnee flop Hep op West Ilan ePt Virginia who voted with tho ho Democrats |