Show JI FOR FOIL Sir Samuel was WAR the th who h MIl tu to ortell tho rigor rl r of at th law in 1808 lie ho d II I hili repealing the statute of ot h larceny habe I Uy death and nr III four Inter Int lio can led other bill of lit a I similar indeed It Is IR chiefly to 10 Qt fort thAt our Hi In for Its III present of humanity One Ol e or 01 two of ot the former punish I urn ao au curious It lt mn b ln lo 10 th m In the f Henry Hent VIII wn Ia mado t h en enIOn n son IOn and the punishment was to ba boiled was PI out In Inthe II the case JIe of at one John Johll Hous who v poison polon Into n I pot 1101 of ot broth prepared ll for forthe the family TillS In III common with many mill matt ut laws lan wan WAil r p l ly iY I VI The law of i w a 11 by statute W 31 Hdward 1 II n i in i II IIa n a punishment for lor those who lJ er rf lI accusations It did not nol im however was w lel ono years trial Crimes of or an nl till 1 such as ns n wife W t nel a n servant mAter an his hi superior were held II U a u man MIS WIlS and mt a 11 woman drawn ond Web lI n 1 t liar In the Holnon i that the ofa j lih r rout i out should bo scourged lloil Joel up till In n n 1 leather lonther sack with a n dog Viper and ape lm und and then In In Inthe the tho lieu sen I his mother was WIlH tho Iho list who this punishment In tho your of ot Home nut Hut tho punishment has lI In modern J Thus In III nt at Jaan on 0 March 1 I a man ilia II for his litter after being placed In hi a bar barrel rel with a 11 cork cock a II snake a n monkey and a toad load was thrown Into nto the tho rN r Another common punishment n long 1011 obsolete U every one 01 acquainted with wih tho of ot the Star Chamber knows Kars 1111 noses oseR wera most frequently out ulf olT the excuse being that th loss of ot does not tend lend to weaken the culprit whereas tho loss of ot uti an arm or r does Karly law member for tor member forgetting lint linton on 01 a a repetition of at the the pun punishment cannot be repeated mans |