| Show SUED FOR 1 O David Hughes Alleges That Sho e Robbed Him of Is f 4 I 1 i A f I 1 for lor lime Hie Lou Lot of or Ills I ui IMo lIro and Child lime Sum f i Alleged slanderous remarks marls r by u a I which resulted te In enticing en enticing his hl wit 1 away front from him ID I the th ground tot for a damage dI dIthe In Inthe Ii the tue distrIct court count today by I David heat le F p I D V 1 liess I lIes and nn Alice Alce Alcele leTho Tho The complaint alleges that Mrs Hens 1 Uj who thio Is II tho the mother of ot plaintiffs wife stated to one Maggie Marshall In Au August August U gust 1601 and amid to various other pOrton f that Hughes was Ia not miot lot n a fit Pt n man mun to live lve with her daughter that abe nhu Iw hind had hll tried to break thou thorn up II u 11 would sep Rep arate them then before tw elm hl stopped In 11 September IDOl 1901 said defendant Alice lies Hoss maliciously and umI slanderously told toll old Alice Alce Hess Hughes HughH that tho the plaintiff said lahl David Hughett had har consorted with wih I prostitutes The actions of ot Mrs rl Hess HUl were ero acquiesced In and confirmed Ly by L her hem husband hu band F p b D Hess leu leuBy By fly reason of ot these thesa slanderous Is re no remarks 10 marks and amid Ind repeated urging by ly the th lie de ate plaintiffs wife on te n 28 HOI 1101 was wn prevailed upon to leave leavo le o liar her husband which lilac he did taking their heir iI child with wi wib h her und Ind tins has ever re no remained from roam him The lime Plaintiff c asks tc Judgment In tho the sum maim wIre of It affection for tor the tIme alienation of or lila his Is |
