| Show C City fined finedA A Judge JuIge Diehl Oe Holds That Tot I Was Guilty of Contempt In Using Forbidden crA rk Meeks Mecks tie tC Is Appeals Hi tI w 1 City Cf J 0 was morning found t UI I f of or contempt OF Q 4 court ald tO tt pay llY a line lino Ino of D Dor GI or 01 bo be bi taken Into cu ll by tIme the until flume fine h is I paid A humid bond of ot I Ihns has hns been I I gRan ii tho ease case will viii 11 bo be o ull ai 1 In lit II tho thu case of ot W WC C 0 Meeks Macks II wih With l contempt af ut court found that ho lie h under thu JI c of ot lila big superior nail and h 11 he was o OT d Titus Thus the tho of o Whether the be ol oh ble seal cul of or tho the city etty HIM sl I b he 15 to the time or od orders lern of Judg Diehl lun hll un ur Ut will bu he bl i ill to time Hie Ile higher and in lii II the Ihl t he lUll ion of or d li I known kimn the ju iou mom will 11 ha ins upheld Time The Diehi had Ill to tIme tho seal Bral was wan bore hOI lie ilio til I of ot the Ihu Suit Salt Klit La Iah timpie wholly fion the time city or ui state tutU and therefore T for tOl the tha court Time hp rout coo ordered that thul It bo bu changed but Ny m Strom no attention to it I boyom saying Baying 11 that It stand a n aH u it wa waOn wais 1 On March 4 Judge Jud Diehl found Hi Lii time tho II seal had ha been bee II used in iii op court be lie Issued an aim 11 oidor OltI that 1 I Ii shot uJ not be bl used on any an or UI proc issued l suell out of or the court In II t I older Judge Diehl ohl said he ho Ie found fOuM th ti there van 11 no provision in law that ti t I II court must Intuit have hao a 1 flea eni that one w Ila Unnecessary Meeks at Ut took look the order ti m Ny who Iho it I IH is said II annulled the city attorney anti and td Meeks Meeke to go 0 ahead and anti use UA th the Instilment Ins tin ment despite despie the orders nf of Ir the cout cour This was done and the court prompt ordered brith bolh Ny and Meeks Meeka to u a un peat pear In court and show enuse why tin tIm ti should not bo be punished toe for City Atty Ath Att Shout Shoun flied nH n a I answer III In behalf of ot Meeks M kl mind and an a nl davit dait In behalf of the time latt setting set forth that he was nl sick at 1 l 11 home with nervous headache and u tn tin able Rile to appear C II I In iii II Time The matt mit was as continued IndefinItely but yest day time HIP court ordered order 0 r that a n 11 of at attachment be Issued for and amid made madl for far l r this at Ut 10 Th iea Jeon reason on for Cam this l ller t tier der ler f as IS th the court curt said Bald h he had b bs Informed thin tn the defendant os M U longer long r Ill II IllAt At 10 this ibis morning th rl cI er leiH 1111 I IR and Atty t Shoup nii d In m anti and tit tatter lattur tiled illeL lerl 11 in an Mi of ot anil that 6 I bo ie purged of or thu Iho him himi hll him rI II i the tl ti lowing I I I 1111 f r t had 1101 h no llon 1 p the tl mutter am limo tho of Qt t Match mm si nut Ilot lawful In lh th the law 11 lm for lor a I oal 01 tl in 11 t i f u rd in 11 time the Ih Thiril i That an tiN an LUI ni r of ot tilt kf I lt I Mr was wan al bound to 10 toey tobe be ey nil all thereof MII urn It wan in tin i 11 Unit tIme tie seal I al was wal in iv ly Ih I city 11 dp op tJ in ind U ii 11 v Ihl t in mayor mayorA Aliv Atty A I I y Mi Ii iii U p made nn 11 mm ox aiu IW i ht in li he caid nid that the COUrt Hint i ulin wih v I I ii tIme tho th rulo os of ot 0 f ho he hf 1 is isitt itt oin i und antI 1111 time the court In io jU mi dirt IK I u II 1 pul en I on OIL Oi all al 0 i I Irita rita rim and I and nu aY time the city I wax 11 H ii I court ourt of lid hI im thought o wax wa a ii 10 I it have a n seat seal enA Mr Mi I lump hot lp t admitted it I mu I hat I the tie court ecu rt should simoti Id Cove aye in hn In II time tho selection of it sen iUt hul did not think It was wan ao II ito n i He flu 10 said gold that tIme the to do de n in don was vAs not In contempt tt tr cowl OUI but hut in with wih the time thew w II in lii fl imaging on oh 01 the time lahl mild smIl KII In thi th ca case CYe e of W SV V 0 e Meeks time the th Lirt l finds that he ii tas fa Qs acting t e of or Mr and situ could Ib b Im else He lie e will wi therefore lie hn h HI Eli DIhl hi Ii I helm I continued cant iii tied The Ihu Phi u tut an In md r on Ol the tIme of tiC t lurch ni h that an en alleged nl w seal III should not hi t u used cd ell On Ol the thc day dDS time Ihl lurt found toun that time thu alleged seal sol lied hud len UMed and the mini bud bad hl been vu I agree with lh couns I on some 1011 hu hii i find that time the city council d no lie 1 to 1 order older the tho ceal made in Ic no provision In the tho th set act AI Ihl ru r rt tom for a mm seal Th The t or 01 ordin din i made in hY tims Ih court curt wits WIS lawful and onil It t was WIS violated In fact act It ItKa I Ka iH die simply tome ome to n a of ot or not It the clerk clerIc of or the time court fl t I being bring the clink ilk dIe tc IC to tIme thc court This commit COIt has lias sonic some IOle Mr N smIled d and that UI ni must be b maintained Mr Mm I Ny NJ will 1 be br found guilty uly nf or ron eon t IIII Vh defendant lf was mus UK then ordered to lu nIl up 11 and a mm tine flue of ot 1 50 O wits was Imposed ioup hoUI asked the time court to fix fis n a I bond bondt II nn en appeal 0 and It I was Ine accordingly t i YM t i oil ed in the tIme sum Mum of at 1100 which was 1 yiv JV tv |
