| Show LAYTON A t ilio Ilic Case Cane Co C Editor Do News Dear t to make u ii correction lIon tion In in regard to the Iii of or tire the trial of of Utah v vs CliM W an iii reported In lii issue of or tire the Your Yota That tho tiro case caie wait Suns ed on tire the motion of tire the Kate for the reason that evidence that was tins to be given by u ri wItness who was not In tire tho tatt wax Suns riot not forthcoming the ite t Isi t muss not having has I pig put iu t In I a nn tin up in P tine the testimony bring being very sery ma ate material and not being evidence without It The rue re returned turned tinned a verdict of riot not guilty under the direction of tine thc court The lirt district attorney in jut his motion for dismissal stated that on account of the evidence given gisen not 1101 being clout to convict autO also nio that one of the tho witnesses who would testify along tine the came caine lure lino UH tie tine thc other not putting bitting In In nn art appearance at court ho inc hobeing being heing out of tint the state at tire the time the motion wai made fIne Tho evidence given being for conviction hour arid and tire the evidence us forth trout from tire the wittiest out of tine tho attn to being the t ins rn Inc line ii Ire there therefore fore ft re It was not material evidence as your you i ay say In hr your article From tire thu reading of your article one would con conclude clude that tIne the party was suns guilty of the its i rime but oh account ot of Porno Home In tire the states they were unable tIllable to prove prose It This ibis clout Is wrong Tire The verdict of not guilty suns made inside because tho tue had no Ito evidence whatever to the effect that he was tuna guilty of any such sutin offence You will kindly waite make tire the correction in Iii your next of the tue SemiWeekly tutU and yours W |
