| Show SUPREME COURT GOURT AFFIRMS TWICE I t Two Opinions Handed Down Sus Sustaining taming Previous Judgments t 1 v i I LOAN THAT WAS AS Dl Ill I It 14 ll liy heed Set A 1111 In III Joust Jului t II I 1 A Nor Case Tin Till l court COUI today thu Ito nt bt tin this lower hIllel court lul In lit the tho of or the Marn and company v 11 M 1 1 II if D Desky sky wife The suit Mull was to 10 o foi clono o a it IIII I of ul it respondents its on Oil wan tae alleged l to 10 bo be tie Im 13 7 Tim Th lower 11 01 court found that Ihl hUll hud overpaid tho thue amount It t of or it t loan lout us In III I R the Ihl t Ii t mini stu in of II J und gau gito 1 tho the fur IIII that amount und suit the thu tI and 1111 11 n of the Ihl An All 4 ii ii hued I was fruin that t ii ii t duel cloth shun Klim to 10 till tho Ih court situ Joe Jutt tiit ht the Ihl IB III I H ri eti In lbs liy tu h I Justice J tie thus Minor i and J Ii I a h that t I there WilY lIlt ns S no Ito Fe and 1111 a Ill ruth ng the IIII Justice HiI this thu opinion of ot the thur toti t t today In III I it the Ihl theof Chili of ut John hurter Harter nail wife vs H 1 P A ti pun I on I in lit which hi thin tho do llo cl dc hit of lit it tho ho I lowet court lull ri ID Is rated action wits WilY bi ought to 10 Met ot et u do doa a Il to 10 V II hu I Ii h 11 I t I I Is a I tin the were werl Induced to ex ox by hy fraud anul on lii the hue part of ot appellant and without any IIII Ion con I to it The ihie hl ease was tried before Je I I wlm decided lI III hIt favor futor of lit respondents dents den is and it the Ihl t lie dood pet Pt aside hi This Judgment la is l II III by ii b the thc unanimous decision of or the tue court o Suit Stilt A 4 stilt milt huts been filed In hut the hue district dl court COUll lu itt which Frank Thompson seeks to In ii recover from trum Stephen Hays the lice sum of It r J I IO us LU for rOl the Iho wrongful detention of ot of ot the Iho water of ot the tho ml ditch which be belonged longed to 10 Case I lout recommendation of ot Judge huh Hall I today minted Anna i e C a it divorce from her hor hus hll husband band hut Win Wm ut T P led Fun Brounds tel for divorce were ore desertion to ho support Plaintiff was given the Iho custody of at their gIrt Irl was SIns allowed 12 i 1111 month alimony and 25 21 as us attorney fees A case was waR filed I today In the tho district court by 1 lice her husband John T to 10 support Is hit I thu ground for fill v Laura 0 O Buxton today toila filed suit In Inthe inthe the district court for tor u ti divorce tout her hue r husband Matthew Al it h I 1 on the Ihl of or leR and failure to lu stu Ph 0 I C The hunk of this ner fter n 0 pout noon entered sUIt null UI Peter Peler It I Kim Ihn to III recover 1111 11 the thue sum of 1 alleged overdraft Judge Is lii this afternoon n 11 In iii ti ng s ideate In Irl regard to 10 tile tho actions ii et iii its of the Ihl lu water ii t 4 I by Icy ice Ihn I court iii r t In III i a till huu juse 1181 of nt Suit Hull luko City ii 11 ot It t al ud VH Vt 8 the Halt Luke Lake ot mid ft 1 ll leal P ite company co t III al The city and four finn of lit till tho en 1111 I companies coil flit fl lee complained ci II I I that t hut t tho I hut com comil till Iii I ii I tOll I ii g U a KIWI clesi III il II I Tit the u Ii II KH 1411 I to U haste Mt and till the t hue court cotuit rill fur an 1111 it II outer prohibiting h iii 1 I hg action letta Jolin le filed suit ull t In III tic the till ills riot court ourt this Ihl 11 rum ll in ball and a mud other to III a n on Oil lot hot C G and north half of lot r Ii L block 1 I of oC Kimballs subdivision lulI of block II 11 I I pint 0 e Judgment Is III asked In sum II 11 hi of together with Ifo 2631 31 for flit fo taxes HI III on lit the property and anut UG 75 71 at nt attorneys attorney torney s II tees fees i t Margaret i C Is suing A AI W WI I and the hue Inco House e for damages for tho the malicious ur or orret ret refit Imprisonment of oC plaintiff at atthe atthe the Instigation of ot defendants on Jolt Jan 10 1902 |
