| Show 1 01 Tho Iho of court lira are to public ie lc pct They I also ol n to tn public It does not 1101 fol rol follow rollow low that a II opinion Is tight a 1 majority of or judge In a II Html appellate court upon It It J may mU mUto for to ll time lime 1 I o the end of ur legal con controversy It I In I or 1 com comment COl ment Judges are til he of ur the people as much tin any IIII other lect ed cil of tho government The he Following 1 of a 1 distinguished l r of or tho Iho Now York bar bUI once a I judge of ut high we 1 ru card J as ns oun and to this subject They by y no 10 tOI Ion In 11 In II the capol of to newspaper who w lell Im for tor linger Hoger or comments In II Law Notes for Undoubtedly any alY publication of or which the tho effect IH It tu 10 obstruct the of If Ju ro or to 10 Its It I lin administration is IH an offense ni tho of ot the law In but hul hn ho pretension that Ihu I the conduct of ot IH exempt from Irom popular erslon Is III it n which a freo treo people wil disdain to 10 admit Indeed just t In ni the Ihl judicial function all ni In II nr an ll It Il does loe the life Irl liberty Ilert property of t tl citizen should It Itle I tl le In III to 10 the th utmost freedom of und and If I It Ite I be e said by h tha Ju Hill 1 he 11 Into con contempt tempt empt I answer InSler any arbitrary and 1111 action of ur the judiciary hould expose It to 10 and ant obloquy 10 o the Ihl lt mt It I be li speedily to o Its 11 IN function of III ne the Ihl and Interests of o the coin 11 n I It In one uno thine to 1011 nee ence to tn the tl nf or the court OIt It II l another nother ami p r most mischievous by b of If contempt to 10 shield tho ho court from Irom the I criticism I l f the Ihl public preen 1 Vo 0 In II these I tilled States not labored so HU 1011 I ml suffered l so 10 henl for the tho over I of executive and parl I In order to 10 the Iho molo loro Insidious but bil not nol less of ot tho bench |
