Show n I I iW tW tl oh 01 1 ol III Boim cm want sammi lithe 1110 A t Lowe Loise M r U fl anti D n DC nl C l 1 rl IB 1 of tIme the estate of nf f 1 hlO suit stilt ull In jut Hio tb district court against Apen or CI tu to o title to Iv a JL In III it ight of oC way vo over PUlL part of ot lots 1 I timid and F block 75 76 plot plat A The complaint allege H that bitt prior to tu 1891 1107 thu the lie L of pt pc way sa which runs iun north from First street Just Juat l CommercIal street and Is in known its lUi liM not 1101 been i taxed l Hut htmL that In lii that roar your ear U It was 11 taxed Inu 11 at mit the then n valuation of ot 14 15 the tax lax mounting to te 3 The fh to together gether with tIle tho defendant who Is III a it 1 of tit tho lie property applied to the Ihl lii authorities to have hate tho time tux lax tuxes I es ls abated as 18 a It had thAt not been heln custom customary ary nt Or to tax In alleyways Tilt The I plaintiffs believed that the tue tuxes tot for that lint year emir lur hud had been abated but the de till defendant knew the sumac same MIl hail not nor oM foiled failed to so M o Inform tire tin th plaintiffs time property Willi y sold Huh for Cor or on Jan JIW ID IG 1902 tho ho county auditor executed ex 11 a it tax deed for Cor forthe till the to tu thu tho Houston Heal HH gl mite late Investment company and Hid on Jan 16 18 that thal company lill transferred time the to C Clawson It Il Is l lull alleged ull gell that the Houston Investment company had hall no In III tho thin roer ty t but bill merely entered ito Into to the trims action nt lie tho Instance of ot the time defendant Plaintiffs offer tp It reimburse defend emit int for tor the tint connected with time the tax lux sale of fir time tie property null and ask that hat they lh y title to Lv a 11 In l crest r In I tiie be laud butt |