Show SUPREME COURT COURTON ON N FISK FISI CASE GASE Affirms Du islon of Lower Court lri hi Divorce 1 i 1 OF on JUU At h 1 Ihl Ihk lo 10 It Court oil U Decree U I MI Not Jut 1 gum La is L In lii the tho lh rn ease o of ot R 0 I F p risk Fisk IRk VH vs H 0 O 1 Ulie Allie Fish the lie Ih li court lOUIl ecu it by II b chief Jus JU JUlit 1 tuii lit Miller fuday iday handed l down Iown lbs Its du tie Li iii thil I tug tho ii e decision nt mit tho Iho t lie low 01 iii court ft The Iho suit Hull t IU Ito s brought gilt In III I Ii ell Cur Curb m b hOIl m OtI fl thit complaint iii t asking mug for II u titi cLeft In Iii favor of plaintiff on fill lie gromi mills of The thi lh t Mr II ulio 1118 us a n le l or of In Indiana diana answered U lN In iii person to lo time the com complaint plaint Ida I lit ii nth put In I mm a it tim n ii I iii plaintiff for rt a it decree of or divorce ii her hN husband ht and for foP forthe the he I lIly of tiC hI minor ma I nor child ill Id anti and US USper 25 per month 1 ii for f n Its Is I I ii support also it so for fat juro EO YH C CH CHho Time The ho lower hover court rt found futi mid In favor or of ur thu thic this the Plaint lIT to II time the sO H court claiming air that t liti t the lie lower r I hilt no Ito Jurisdiction 1 ii let ion o vei lie tho I defendant t by reason of uC 1111 lIun Inthe Ild lp tie state cupid 1111 lie tho de le decree cree rt e lou law Thin Tho action of or time tho lower court Is by tho thu de tit II if thu supreme cutlet court which snitch holds Wilt that My Iff h reason of oC the hr In iii the tho case calc she oho lied hUll entirely within the tho jurisdiction |