Show U I Mr full lIm III II o An thI Questions New N eW W York Voth March hearing In Inthe Inthe Inthe the sM by Peter Power In Jn the tho United hulLed It II ti court for tor or the din of ot Minnesota for t or r the purpose of determining before th the law of the and Ind holding of 0 Northern N and Northern II I the thO SOi rom rain j was wits hen helD thin aUer noon nonn before A Mabby y a Jpe pe pedal I dal rIal examiner I Jacob If Jr of If lh finn of Kuhn uhn t Co t was the witness lie lievan II van s qU u l Dy 11 A XI M Hout ll of It Minneapolis 1 of for l Iter ter Pow Power er Mr Mv sahi he hI was a II member of t board of or of the Ihl North Northern Northera ern era uIn the th part of I and hart hol 11 l u II of tile HIP A railroad lt doming t UJ HP lie I IR n of If C the th Northern S r Up to 1 UI he lie was WIlli II hI d In the I hI Northern He JIll tilt fUrl not r how howin ho I in fh stock he hud had In the Ih heat North NorthIll I t ero Ill he III had not held any nn of ur It shore thi th of lid Ian viar yar He lIe waa n 1 aa 88 one oDe of u II i T of or who In Ute i l serin of ot North pm cm At II time the time line of the if ll 11 of Unit tIM road rai W VOI H Hi MI Hill In Iii that thai U dai 1101 was wan Mr Hill Bill ran tell lell you ou replied Mr ir rhe sah alil Dil he lie had of stuck In ha i For I or whom did you net act In I thou that m tk k I 1 to an w r Did you OI act for fir or the HarrIman In Int treats t 1 I 1 decline d hine to answer I 1 to answer II any ally I the thi of Kuhn Huhn Ix f b ft r 0 to do tin no so wan viiu thi th of lit M dI r Miler lIe He sahi the tho tock stork wan noi flot tot for tho lie of ur the control of tho ho lit for tor or the Union Iu lie He ul o to answer a 1 mention n fla IJ to whether he Ite hail had acted ll fUr tir any Interests Interest In JO I Ilia Ihu ton Ho HI HII I wild he h l no Io previous knowledge of lit till the effort of ot tho the Northern foIl and tile tho Northern to lo get gilt hold of at tho thol l |