Show JUSTICE BARTCH FILES ANSWER i Gives His Version VIon of Morrison Mining Tangle DENIES THE ALLEGATIONS Ho IIo Jl Us II 1 ln Heady Uel c Jt i Call sli 1 II I W by nt at I noys ickson Kills Ellis Hils Kills Ellis thin J ruing filing ing tiled lib his h answer with tho thu clerk 1 the district court curt In II the tho of ot C v Il VS 1 n II Snow SIOW the tha th I Mining company und nI others I ha lie recently mantle mado a u 1 party part r Mum Minn upon U motion of o defendants flu Tho Tue ho answer states stales that lint till nil ni tI of ot time the complaint of ut C e C 1 I D lion nr Ile lime true trim t ruo und mind Uld proceeds to de tie dei dl j i If allegations at I butt mentioned umlaut in iii ia er by which e hunch Kartell Is 18 uc tic Il m 1 of ot lh lie tho plaintiff tine Iho suit sUI i the lit Justice Hartch alleges lit I did not meet the tho tle torms tot of jim h ent mentioned In Iii the coma com COI j 11 I I liy iy lila his failure to tI file Illo 0 II it copy cupy of ot It iuli mm ni of ot Incorporation i ion In II I mu the tho tato f IO o a IH as iH to 10 nimble mumble Ilium ho 1 company t to I rry rr on 0 ii Its Is lt work In iii II said wall It A d filId Ihl list hut Hams furnished the tho thoy y to i organize the tho company that lil 1500 to carry On 01 tIme the work at company which lice has Ius not been ICI re cc reto S i 1 to o luau him b 11 In h excess of ot the tho lie sum SUI of at atS denies denial that luat by b reason of ot antipathy to jilt Is IA Snow ho to cull u it I ug I mn g I of t f the limo board of ot directors of ot said I I tOil Y for lur the time purpose of ot levying nn an ni u m nl i on 01 Its Is stock toole mind and alleges hu line has tier ever been ready to call when requested by the thu hll s sLi holders in accordance with wih tho thin thoe thor Ii Irks r e 0 if It Incorporation It fi I Is denied if t ne he CN et Iler cr tr exercised un tiny control over owr overacts I acts of H Ii I II I a it l tol i It f tho the company He lie denies he hitis neglected tuil to take 1118 any Un no ne iii the thu lle matter or of disposing of at the 01 1 I by the company arid and alleges tl Dial thu the lie ole oro Yule was WIS disposed ed of at after tho filing of ot the thI complaint hut but before tho tIme thor r answer was as tiled Hied led Jo i denies that he user ever oel acted In a hostile manner maller towards tho time Interests o fh limO corporation by b either fit her securing or nt the location by W V H 11 1 Child ill ly other Ot hem person of or claims on 01 the time theil iI il J la nd I ii property Denies Deities that Ii over conspired or i tet with plaintiff Morrison to In duce tc hint him In to bring this null sUt or that hint ho lie hover J ver ei j demanded r df de Snow noI that tho stock tock J lJ I bo bi I divided with wih him timid that wholly false falso In un unIl Si Il it j it denied ll d that tint Morrison MorrIson iii lilA in of at this suit stilt Is II mining acting under the time direction of ot Justice Hartch or om 0 that It has been lel agreed that the fuls of or ortho tho the action acon If I any nl shall Ihal be divided be between tweet tween them thol or that defendant bias Interest contingent or oh other otherwise wise In the tho stock In litigation It TI I Is I also that has hns been dam damaged damaged aged ag In im the sum of ot or In hI any sum w t |