| Show PARK WILL CASE IS INTERESTING Contest of f Mrs Hilton Hion is Being Fought Hard THE fIE DOCTOR WAS ANNOYED ANNOY m U lieu Told foll It I OM I Would f OUT the At the tie adjournment nt pf t the equity dl Il vision I lol of oC til Third district OIt yes YOSt yesterday evening a IL continuance of the Park wi will contest COl lest caso was Will taken till ti 10 Monday morning The Tle News Newl report yesterday clos tl with wih the thu corm of ot the reading ral of oC this thu deposition of Mrs Hannah C Wells Weil nt lt the tho conclusion of ot which n 1 twenty twell mess was WIS taken The defense e then began hegan tho Introduction of oC testimony n 11 before loCore adjournment eight of oC Its It witnesses had hul been en ex ox examined During IIII the reading of ot portions of Mrs 11 Wells Wel deposition It was Wll with that many of the th listeners checked che et a to laush For I or Instance where the deposition dealt with the tho conversation between Dr 11 Park lalk In the deponent the recover of or Annie Ar 1 after her hiI to Dr D Park on her hI supposed death bed bcd bedI I r thought he was annoyed when I told him that I thought she would re recover 10 cover conr rends the deposition and I 1 that Dr Pork Park Wil not very IY proud proul ot oC his hll bride Another state statement ment lent of ot the deponent was to 10 tho effect that tier her husband President I D H Wells remarked that Dr Park had In Intimated Il to him that he only wanted the marriage to stand In the event of ot Miss death would repudiate It If It she lived 1 al With tho conclusion lun of the reading of ot tho deposition plain plaintiff tiff Wi rested her hN faclo cane CI I After u lL twenty minutes recess the th e called calel to the tho witness S W Stewart the executor un under der ler Or Dr Parks will wi who testified that he discovered d among ulon Dr Parks the certificate of the thE sealing and the Church separation He had not shown these thele papers to anyone or spoken of oC their existence till til Mrs Hilton had commenced her hol suit for a I widows dower right In the estate left leff by b Dr Paik 11 On motion moton of at Judge Powers this testimony was WIS stricken out ns IS being belne Im Immaterial material 11 Dr DI J T lur testified that he had known Dr Park for years Prof W CJ O husband of oC Hose no e P 1 one on of ot the defend defendants detent ants whose hole title tte to the lot on south deeded to her Dr Ninth Kant 2 t street by Park Is disputed by Mrs Hilton on the ground that she had hat not lost her hr dow r right testified as 18 to the conveyance of oC the property to his hi wife Mrs Hoy Ho lunce that she had lived lell under Dr 01 Parks root roof for tor years and that the deed to her property was 11 given her by Stewart Judge Jud Stew Slew Stewart ort art testified that he had hM delivered the deed to the upon their written of nil ni claim against the Park estate George Glor e F P said that he had hll In Introduced the plaintiff Dr nr Park lk as they the leaving England In II on their way Wl to Itah He le was In II charge of ot the business of nt the tho emigration of the Mormon Church nt lt that time tl Mm MI Eleanor 1101 testified that she ho was as n passenger er on the boat which out Dr D Park and anI Miss age She hall had never noticed any Ily par particular paid by h the doctor to plaintiff Mrs I Trowbridge re going for Dr Park on the Ihl of 01 the celestial marriage and bringing him to IH bed bedside be side Ride She sold that Miss In talking to her hr of ot the tho ceremony after afterwards wards wads had stated that she Rhe uns only sealed scaled and free to marry If she wished Attorney Van VOI Cott Col then offered In evidence nn In abstract ot of Dr Pork Parks lon con conveyances of ot property since 1188 In II which deeds the claimed to 10 bo bon h hI n I single man Other Instruments were re produced to show that Annie Allie F I A Hil Hilton ni ton Ion acknowledged herself ns iK William Hiltons wife Judge JuIRe Powers objected to the Introduction of these deeds ns n evidence on the ground that Dr Parks declaration that he la was unmarried was not lot conclusive testimony The fhe point nt at Issue old he was waR whether there bud been n marriage A sealing for eternity ho h said could coul not he h recognized by the tho law II The of ot the deeds Into the evidence will wi ho bo argued and passed ased on 01 on 01 Monday lontay morning |
