Show VARIOUS COURT couii CASES Magnetic MR Janies McNamara Ic and his hiM and Proprietor W J Montgomery Grand Pacific hotel anti unil his hil hi had ball hadn a over oer the possession of o QI furniture In the lo loel loel el I recently N which resulted requIted 10 in n tho the healer out a 1 complaint before eger EIre llo yesterday afternoon look took testimony In the divorce case cane of ot ofa otO a O C vs 1 Lois Lola and will wil recommend recommend recommend mend that the tho be granted Sit tier testified that his wife left let him 18 months ago after ater selling a 1 hOlse In 10 Denver Deler worth which ho he had hul given her II H C Fisher was Mo a wit witness wl ness liens for plaintiff Frances Frnnces 0 O WI Luke has hl petitioned tho probate court that she shie be bo appointed administrator of or it the th estate of Fanny Knapp deceased estimated at 00 The rho hearing will wil bo be b May 3 Walter Waiter I 1 L Hanson Hansen asks to 10 bo bc appoint appointed t td ed td d administrator of his deceased fathers U E estate to In real reat estate The 19 children 9 are the heirs Sot Set for April Charles H E has commenced suit stilt against James T Keith and Wil W liam 1110 C Cunnington for tor who is a dentist claims that on August 19 1 the defendants d con conspiring together Induced the county clerk cerk of ot Wyoming W to cancel up upon upon upon on the tho record of ot the office the registration lion tion ton of his hil denial d diploma dated tate Jan January wiry uary 3 ISM 1595 He lie claims to have grad graduated from train the Western Wester College of Den Dental tal Surgeons Burgeons of St Louis toon March 1 1883 At the time of ot the cancellation of or the Ohio th registration be was doing a bust bus business U these iness In Evanston J of 26 5 a 1 day He lie says that the defendants who wh are arc Wyoming now In Salt S lt Lake Investigated the cancellation and caused causell him to be prosecuted and Miti fined 50 SO In a 1 Justices court for tor putt practising pre without filing a copy of Ms lust diploma alleges that his pros perjured themselves In order to 10 convict hint him and the tho conviction was an annulled annul nul ell In the t 0 district court He lie tilso tilo charges that pending his trial before b ore the tho justice he was kept five lays days dl in a n I filthy cell cel All Al these proceedings proceedIng hay hav having hl ing lag been published In several news MS newspapers papers papel to plaintiffs humiliation and nd damage socially and professionally ho he asks the district court to grant him re r drees Ire s front from lust his hil persecutors to tho the tune tOne of ot In the he ease of ot Harriet K In N Matson ta R a Butterfield Mining company et at al on motion of ot Attorneys Power and nn am by consent con of ot counsel Judge Hall Hal ordered that lint the tho bill hi of or ex exceptions In thIs thU cause cuse may bo be le filed oe nune Iune pro pr tune as anti for tor March II U UOn On motion of or Frick Edwards F nd It ordered that they be allowed to with withdraw withdraw th draw as a attorneys for the defence In the eAse case of Colorado Beach ench Sanitarium company vs 8 Clara E K Mackle Mackie and Senior F P Mackle Trial was commenced ed before Judge Judeo ll hall ll this In the ease case ca e of ot Thom Thorn Thomas ns as n vs R the Home Investment company m ny and Glen Olen Gen Miller Plaintiff was WI represented by b Stephens Smith and defendants by J A L J Hoppaugh This Thi Is II an action brought by b tot for a n release rele e from ruin a mortgage on real property belonging to him In this city which th he h and anti his lila wife executed Feb February eb 1 I to secure n ft n loan 10 n from tho the Hime Investment company compan of tf 0 Plaintiff claims cl that the tho loan was re repaid paid February 1 1901 1901 but lut the defend defendants ants refused to 10 discharge the mortgage to 10 the plaintiffs damage In 10 The defendants In their answer to the com corn plaint claim lalm that they never lent I nt plain plaintiff turf tiff tN or his hiM wife any sum Rum of money at nt atI 11 iii I but hut that at nt the request t of oC pl and ind ant on Hodder on November i 1 1197 the defendant company a n trust deed dell In which the com company DRay pany was the apparent beneficiary anti Ind and his hl wire wife the tho grantors but that Hodder Hoder was all the real rel under the deed The defendant farther falther claims that the failure on tho the part of ot Plaintiff to obtain a release of or the trust t deed Is wholly hol due to the violation of ot plaintiffs contract In compensating de behalf Miller ller for tor his services In that |