| Show A it FUW FE W MISTAKES The Tho Bt St Ppul Pioneer Press Pres which on ordinary Is a n live and well conducted almost Invariably gee goa off wrong wron on questions relating to Utah particularly In reference to anything nn Mormon Commenting Common ling on the recent N decision of ot tho the Supreme court of or Utah In the he ito Graham case cape the Pres IrH concludes This decision uns ns rendered In over Oel overthrowing overthrowing throwing tho hO verdict of ot n a lower court courtIn In the hue Ih ease of n a Mormon Indicted and found a ci lilY ty on eum n U put d t In Inthe tho the county count where the polygamous wife lived Every torr iver week Irk nulls to III the Ih Indica Indications ions that lint the Mormon authorities li Ip hen r executive anti and Judicial lire ate bent hent benton henton on rendering of ot no effect ft ct tho the constitutional lonni and statutory eta luton prohibitions of ot polygamy There Thero nrc nr a 0 f tel fe w mIstakes In this par paragraph parn n ph which show hn how ho profound Is III th the knowledge of ot the Pioneer Props Vree on tho the question before the court and nd the state Into of ot In la Timo Tha errors are nrc theta hose The evidence was WAif not undisputed On the contrary It w Wf s strongly dl tic put d and go so weal weak that the Supreme court to case w wu was s taken Inken on appeal al IJ l oUt th Ih failure of ot proof that thai the th sal eail Id to 10 be ue a n plural wife ta WAe not wife of ot the H d Th full fht court of ot Utah Is Ie not It Ills Is Isa Isa among the Mormon authorities a n bench ench of ot three Judges elected elf by b the Ih l arid amiul liaR has h been b cn from the Uon of ot the State composed of at three e non or GentIles If It the Press tho the term lerm better belter Finally n neither the tIme constitutional nor statutory prohibitions p of ot polygamy hare bet been n rr nJ of ot no effect for far forthe the pt was wac not against the constitutional and statutory offense of ofir Polygamy If It the Iho he Pioneer Press had fully tull under understood stood the we p do not think that thU with all Its tt n bus blis It hn 4 1 c reflectIons rn on the coUrt It W WItS III n It Question of ot law that mid had to be bli settled eWId anil it 1 so plain on III its face U It w wn 1 th that t the Justice O of ot the he n p IU who decided the did dill not K ese M the dejects detects In Inh Iho tM complaint If It our o In n the nt j rt pj would n U little mor more closely lato Into Utah affairs commenting so 80 pOe pis Jn n dl 41 tolo te to them h fuld Uhl not so tx cx x poe 1090 th lr lack lask of ot Information n sub subjects Jetts to b be rr fm to t th the public I r |
