| Show p W PAY OF 01 O COUNTY has hM ha ren rendered ered dered the th following opinion In answer to 0 a n request from State Auditor C S B as ns to whether till the salary alary of oC county attorneys from Crom Jan JUI January uary 1st to March Uth 1501 1901 Is h it a ii roper proper charge against the tho State and ind If r Ifo so o whether the same can be e paid out ot of f the limo appropriation of ot IDOl 1501 The Tho opinion of ot the Is ha s as follows I am of or the opinion that the State States Is s liable to Sanpete county count and to Utah county which counties havo h M Mou n ft you ou Inform mite inc presented 11 claims there t for Cor or for tor fo the tho salary dt their county attorneys from hit st to March 1501 1901 to your OUr question Whether these claims can be iM out ot of 1 the tho appropriation of oC 1 J I servo serve that the Legislature ap r rl t td ed cd d to the several counties of ot th t iato lato the he sum of or fifty thousand dollars tor for the salarIes of ot for tor the years 1901 and anti so o much thereof as may ml be necessary ats Aa 11 the appropriation Is la not limited tp o th payment of oC the tha the thea he hei 1 i a 4 deputies antI and assistants a named In chapter 47 lawn of 1101 1001 I urn am of tho timo opinion that the tn claims chUrns mentioned unity may bj LII paid out of ot that hunt appropriation for tor forthe the lime he reason that t they thOro tIme are a n proper tilt State mud and tIle tho Legislature l not nut having excluded l them must liatti intended to for Cor their payment |
