Show NO ARRAIGNMENT IN BROWN GA CASE E EI I His Attorneys Filed Motion to Quash the War Warrants Warrants rants tants ARGUMENTS NEXT MONDAY Motion on ott tIit Ground I Court Con it li II Vl t huI 1 loin I In lii he the Ih Mutter Arthur Aithur 11 ro 1111 the tho young man ir u icI tested cited I lenrol nays days ago ugo churned charged with forgery torGer lun vae not l of ut tb Ih the city court today aM contemplated Another motion to In toI quash line of ot it arrest In tho Ihl 1310 I vu tile by br 1 H soil fun who Whit re re nt tIme Ihl and Judge I net et Monday morning nt nl 10 11 lod iOk UK 1111 tine the time for tor hearing Iho tim arguments oil the motion Theia I lira are I two to of o forgery ant and utter titter utterIng hog Ing n ni instrument t Drown I anil auth the Ih mime mot 1011 uns tiled In Imi each tathi caw CliFt The motion to tl tile IH III I billed on 01 tint th ground that the time court COUlt lii without Jurisdiction in III tic lito can canI I the hut i liml not Inot been be ph lf Id w lIh It hi In to I o I n e LI hull ii g tho ho thoi I hoI i 1101 1111 I liga 1 thol I ha t the I h a complainant cot ii lit J JH 1 H II II II 1111 1 not nUl an amly other othet o tit as were lIerl not examined oath nathi or by h deposition or before tim tho Ih milt meg relative to hi their knowledge tt rt the offense offence e churned that there no nil nili i evidence before the thu Ih upu i which a warrant of ot at could multi he tic Is III Isi IIII i KuI that time the county attorney did UltI not inot Into the tine tho 1 I defendant ns nH required by hr law t te IJ i proceeding In III the ia liSt e Are arc i to 10 It tin the of 01 the tile Unit United States Iu In km lint t It deprives a n parson of or orI I without hUll I due process ot of law lawI 11 I that It II In itt also nl contrary to 10 tie tho th i of ot for the tile wine Mill I the motion were werl the i of ot I J anti A Snot 81 son so Ii both hot ii of ut it HIar Hi that ha I they i 1 ivero ver It present In III tIme the Ih room when tIlt apt swim to the its un 1 that t Mil a I as nut not examined iyIh iy ny this the Ih relative to 10 his hilt hl know of nt if th time offense ul I nod that tint lie h did not road read the complaints lio fore torr nrc he h to 10 them At 1 the lun of the Ih reading rending of rut till the motion timid this I 1 lI koil that time the nu m nta RH gui until 1111 tI I Mommy alit hi hl tile l request iti tin d hunt lilt date heInz agreeable ble to ma A County tOI 1 ney ice I was na In the court loom this the tho ingi In In iii r nipan I itt f IIII Sheriff Andrew n lIol |