Show JU JUVENILE COURT GOURI COURTIN IN SUPREME COURT i Question of Constitutionality oL of I The Latter is Being j Argued I TWO CASES C ES ARE PRESENTED j I i t J J VIII III III teti he hr II Of r I of Tribunal Id no I fuji f I III The of the his jon of ot the th Ih juvenile court lat laA la l h by y the thelast lant last IH i lJ arguer II r be I tort for ore the Ih OUr court today and amid tho matter will 1111 he Ron nl Into thor thoro thoroughly I Iou ou hl Two ca e H His are nr Jointly In the tho th point at lit II are Involved 1 one on of f IH III with In to tIme the jurIsdictIon of or th tIm court courtO over oer O r anti and tho th other In lii rf to The will 11 hOon know knol the s to tile of or Ihl he I juvenile court comm rt and a Iii the d iMMon of tile the court In re rl relation lation In I thin the th mailer will bo be with 1 tilt much Interest I The e cases e i In itt heh Rr lItI nr III nine being hard heird h ld today tire are th the IhO of or the ilu i 1 application of tIC 1 for or It n m I will fir ir f hlll his bee II u C ft I I Mill nt I ii 1 Willi II ro II Judge ju nf of th PI juvenile coUrt The h former if III i th tb nice aile I lie and 1 th bitter I the lie juvenile J II f At 1 i torne orn X N W V took ui II the th entire plon thin morn In hi hiM nt in of ot the th In Inthe thin the Ih IK idIoms nil and had not concluded nt nit the hour nt Ill noon w n X Smith and Janice In ll lt will I this hiM afternoon 11 1 their nN ale In behalf of or tle ts ouri Mr sl 1 r a it St III rut argo ment In he h pointed out ui e fl I III vital In the juvenile lutu l ill would render It II clear In ion iii n Illet with the Ihl 4 of He II pt out to 10 uphold 1 hU hilt COURT NOTES Woods tiled Milt IIII In the lip th r IF dip today IndR for or M 1 i on the th iii of it nuil failure in lit provide Prill I It They TIle 1 wet were maire i HI at II Nih Nh h on onO onil O il a y JT 17 j I VI and n nd have hR on it 11 child of which fluke the It I is III II II I t 1 tint plain plaintiff tiff tiN on Irh Ich U 11 1010 und arul tr oer jv r since h hM inns j failed to III support her herM h r rII M II 11 the Junk r war ius nr or 1 In III hI he I criminal of the till d court urt before Judge Arm rm upon the Ih of nt re stolen proper and pleaded pl not mint to 10 the thie same Mime mf It In I that hilt I tevy rf l I n tn lot of nr hrop from i Hurry Le I Ita and 1111 a bert Miller un tin Apri rI J 2 lK which hud been stolen from Iro the thc Oregon Short ih rt tins Sun San Pedro und and Illo railroads In InthIs thIs thin city clI i Suit Stilt lIlt vas van filed In It the Ih court today teda by h Donni I n he Kiln Ella I I Ward t I the tho American Surety ut of ot New NewYork X en I York and n Ii W V to 10 compel tIm thi defendant nt to 10 pay pa oft off a 1 ll hem n upon tIm thi property of at plaintiff fl and RII thus thu remove I Ithe the cloud on the th title to the was 18 5 ill Ih contractor r who wh built the hou house e for or ond nil the NIH Surety company I on ott his hia hondo bond He Iff tilled failed to tn tIm the com l par y H It hill bill of nt for tor lutrI I r mil it St II In the contract and that company tiled riled It lien ho limo place plunge Plaintiff now nol no A kp that the Ih defendant be he compelled to pay pM PH the amount due IIII for tor lumber aid thus thu discharge tile the th lien |