| Show r DYNAMITE IN PARSONS SlOPE Witness Volunteers Some Testimony Testimony mony Which Makes Kearns Kearn K earns Attorney Peevish P il PRESS ARTICLES M Xo No o IM MM 11 t IH l t eee Wll M w f et 1 fn Io T the When E t R n Id an engineer to mention the t tact fact tal that tbt be he found toul dynamite among m other thing Ih in la late inthe the Uie te Jog IO R Rel or of the Parsons P stop atone while on ot Ihl thIs morning In at t the th hearing of o the Silver King Consolidated Mining ump against the Silver King IUne Coalition Mines company Adrian C Kill Ellis Jr I who r re ra rePresents Presents the Tom f K interests Inte exploded Pled For or some m reason un the Krama K crowd did tint not lot want lo to know ka se ry 1 much about ul the Ihl d story tor and Mr BUI Rilla Bi explaIned explain that ha he haild h did ild dd not no want ant an tn voluntary testimony from rm the Witness It i rut But ful It tur th the word wor dynamite 1 had h entered the record Md Mr Ellis decided to 10 go U Into 1110 the th mat matter I Iter ter a little ItU fui fl 11 I In h hIn r rIn In continuing Ie examination Mr 11 Ellis wanted ant lo I Ii know how It wax was that Ihal volunteered this testimony Why Wiy I matte u ii nute nul of nf It I being bIng In Inthe Inthe the he opening ami all then I was waa careful not to the of ft t drop anything m un stick elk powder PLAINTIVE EXAMINATION Mr Ellla Ellis 11 frowned and nd then said Id Let Lt me see nee Me your ur original aut After some om little I I I hesitation h Judge Jut W H Dickson DIR had ha previously asked Ae to have noted not found fOUM bin h hnotH hi hinote notes note and an there the the word WOI dynamite was waa u written In II it the th notes note It Mr fro Kill Ellis examined Its IM plaintively to see If I It had hd been ben freshly written After A tIe the tho examination he be was mas still 11 suspIcious auspicious of t that tbt dynamite and nd asked ke If he r really ll made md that not note on un the ground The witness ln mid Id that tie he did while hl sitting beside beld the tha dynamite In Inthe inthe the slope to This seemed to make Mr Kills lIlIs 11 I ran rl into Inlo some om more D dynamite suing In In the Ih drift too t the volunteered Where I I a this Ih dynamite In Inquired Mr Kills Ellis all allOh Oh there thel wa wu a doa Sticks al j ran ra raa irons across a rOa at 1 different I made mae a anolI note nolI of some of 01 the tb places place p lal but It not o all 1 the th witness explained 1 G dynamiter dynamIte r 1 a I I Mo 0 It IJ wa w lying about a the drift r and ai at a aa and dl careful e about n 1 stepping Might 1 have I been bl left Ift there by hy n said Id Wh Ph h of lt course ou Mr Kills said aId Id there thee to is 1 nothing unusual about abul min miner and er iss 1 leaving dynamite about hout slopes MIN drifts drift In a mine mill Is ii I there 7 Well WI not net t that I know of or alu replied pl and Mr lr Kills JJ dropped the dy dynamite d dynamite tory story was waa w accused of ot talking to t newspaper reporters reporter about aboul the tile and furnishing report rU to t 5 the th Engin Faa I A Mining MillIng II nine Journal whIch hh were 1 erl prejudicial to tn Tom T an and hla h hd crowd d of ot his hla h minIng cuLt ault It Ith has h been bl seriously objected ot to by b KarD and hi hil his crowd cowd and a for tor this rca rea reason r rn son dun n has b been n a thorn In tn the side Id of r Mr Kill Ellis Sl and an his hiM te teun counsel un 11 FAITH FACTS JA IN IK THE CASK It I a fact tl Mr XI Atty Att acid that you have hf placed your yr Ib own onn 0 1 1 on o tha ti Us evidence pa I end and made md It prejudicial to the defendant d t In inthis this case No fad fC have appeared In III it the tl case which wets were w not prejudicial app to the th de do defendant th the replied ratified I U ry article that was waa w contributed by b you yO to t the mining Journal wa we w pre p Pr a nt It ItI 17 itI I reported the tl facts fact fc ti t the th best beat at of f n my lily judgment Yes Tee Y but bt you u have havo done d everything et In your ou power Jr you yo t tout to make out a cue In favor ravO of the plaint I 1 would like Ik to aea us the plaintiff pet get t what whal coming to W them tm was waa u the wit Wt fleas reply AU Atty H R hi MacmIllan Inter Int I an n objection to t Li th tb the line In of croas examination pl because It LI we was a not the thet heat bait t ba Produce the tho articles anti and let 10 ln u I ua aee ii If Pu they th are af al alto to the III defendant d Mr Macmillan said saidI the article I seen n th aUr n replied Mr Kill Bill pl If It Information EI your YO looking lol f for fOI r then a ker kr K H It who le IS I with the th plaintiffs cl said Id So he h Int Mr M an drawing conclusion from in hes h fm After U this Mr Mi M Kill Bill 1111 decided 10 lo drop drol the th publicity end nd of th lb t c e ae Me He N th tb thea j took the Ih witness back Dk over vr the lb Ih ground of ot the tho Ih StOle MO In II hi bl examination Ka Za Fa the th stand mat roat t of or the th wa w was on afternoon on |
