| Show STATES CASE GASE AGAINST HYDE HYOE If II Plans Arc Not Changed All the tho Evidence for the Prosecution Will be in Wednesday MRS SWOPE LAST WITNESS u n t hi Is M no II It 1 UH I ita It Jt Will Witt be lie Pull INI I of hones 11 lumen I Ilean Kansas lean City May a IlIS nest MSt JEt Wed Wad night eIght P VI Conk lot 1 all 11 the evidence of Usi tb state t agap Dr 8 B c Hyde will be beh h fore he the the Jury Jur It If the Ih present plana pia are re not hinted changed only on I three more n wit will n ill III testify tar for the t efter 1 Dr Ludwig Hektoen Hekt complete CORl his hla h testimony These Th witnesses wl an are anDr anDr Dr jr W v 8 t Relate Ral Dr Victor C Vaughn Vun and Ad nd Mr Mrs wo The defenses cross rosi examination of or Dr D Hektoen It Wa thought at the tb opening of f the tie e hours hour toda today I l be completed In a few faw fw Mr Mrs 11 R nope w I Ii financing In the Ut main mI the of o Or Dr D Hyde will willbe wi willbe be the Ih lent laet t state tt ln He Her tee tew it le is thought t will 1 b b be reached d w na Interest now centers center t In Inh her hr h on o the stand Mend l as is It U Is Uhei I hei hI i o her hl story 1 will mill 1 b b he full of o hu nv nn 0 I in I fl inures fl I rest When Mm Mrs i Swope gave h hi I dl position recently nt In a civil suit ault uit lf 1 KM hi b h by the thc th physicians she ahe refuted refused f fn I t n herself helt to II answering the tl i i H Mk ked her hr herr herI I r flint onit hl between 1 Ur fir r Hyde Hydes attori i r ml d I J rs RaIse HI and Vaughn V I will wi inri nl On n th Ih the alleged nN finding of or cyanide Iud lr Cr f iM t In the t viscera 11 of nt I II Y I II I I I I h riama n The defense r rIhl a 5 thin thia Ihl w WIC only Om an Sn n eleventh hour hor horIn In made mad ml by the chemists chemist In order or orI t I support the th Mate erase It a ase e The T charge ha that Ihal had been b used until by Dr D Hyde H sea waa u not no md until uti Atty AI Alt Jams Jamas JamsA J JA A Reel Keel delivered tb the opening nl state tte ment f fur ir the th prosecution Judge Jud Latshaw today lod upheld u the th states II objection olon to tn the th defenses n In n of Dr Or Iut If I rep rap representatives f of o Dr 1 Hyde H did dl not call 1 upon 0 him on March Marh 1 and demand mand part pr of le the tM he 1 t f Col Cot Thom Thomaa T H 14 and Id MOntle pe peThe The Th defense did 1 not hot nu lIU the Ihl court urt to t appoint a commission of et medical I ex e part tu to examine the ti remaining i rU of o the YI of ot the thee expert e medical 1 S with Ur Us D Hektoen H I In fn Mie Its 1 chair Reed Head Heading ute ing 1 from f a text led book beck sa to hew bees been b written b 1 Dr 1 IM and Walter WaIter W WS WaIterS S 8 Mr Ir Walsh naked the th witness If it hi booth book b not advin experts expert on both side aide I In a trial lo in confer In order nl to it be able ale to tic It the th court r and the tI Jury Jul Ju Dr Hektoen said be 1 IV never had ld read d this portion of ot the text DOCTOR R IH Atty AU Waist W grilled l the wi for tor tailing failing to t confer eter with tb the defenses defense dol scientists scientist when hen the book bk said Id this was w the proper o r thing thina th to do dothe the book bk say y that e are Walsh W liable to t be b b asked u Mr I dont dt know that It II does doea d H It I all depends depend on the tb expert anyhow re replied I replied Dr plied pled D n Mr Walsh Wah thin then questioned with the th thad aid ad of another lor book booI b said I to t hate he e been b written In part by b Dr D Ilaine Ja regard tog In the proper actions action ain of or an expert on to n the stand lad In la order e to make 1 k a good tnt i I with Ith the Ih court mu and jury JUI The T court rt held hd that Dr 1 Hektoen et did nut lut have to t answer Inquiries mad m of or him himin in relation to t the contents content of the th boot boo boota aa u a there th wits was nothing to prove V h l tie had bad b anything to Il IA do 0 with th 01 the writing of It I The question of the th 11 way was again n brought up un 1 by b Mr Walsh Waists l He Uc said d h would ald be able a to t show abow that the t chemists who relied called upon Dr Dy D Halt Hek Hektoen H actS act ton toen were authorised by b Mr Hyde Myde to tou I u Th Tb Th Matte Mate UI agreed it I would woul not Dt object to the Ute witness being b questioned about the lh UN for the th organs organ If this til was done Dr Hektoen nf then thee th admitted aILed he h had ha on I 0 March Sr I refused the d v to the accused CM physicians representatives tire tives On 01 March M 21 f raid Mild Id the th witness wl Atty At John Jon P called 1 upon U him hil ami eCu Jw Dr Maine Hane In Chicago l u and nd asked k fur fr the ll vi and was waa w refused 1 Dr Hektoen He Md said at t that time IR he had nn ni niP n part nf of t f the The witness alsi alu au i admitted P he h refused to 10 tell tl the attorney anything about the th result t of hi I his ex es examination a of o the organs n you OU shortly holy before bo March nh I 1 Iv receive v from tron f the Ih prosecuting attorney atoO an all n order ro tu tO t look lok for cyanide caked asked ak Mr lr Walsh Wal WalI I t dont know that I did answered all the It witness About Ab a month before this trial be he began b hegan gan you o wrote to lu Mr that tt prospect pr for finding ll cyanide were looking good on I l may mat m M have by eap It that tt way AJ If It a letter lete wa was not n seat Bant t to Dr 1 I lain hams by b the t prosecution tn saying more mare funds fund would be b forthcoming If It I D Dr r Hektoen struck tf the Ih arm erm armo of hi Id chair with hi hIs Sat fist t and nd said ed o There Tr was waa wa not nt Mr Walsh Wal demanded again n the tb corn com communication 11 which between the stale 11 and nd the U U The fl court ruled rl ag him hiR The Te defense had hd ha the Ih Saturday but bl returned them t h Mr Walsh Wath began b a series rl of ot technical questions question regarding the th examination of th brain brin Mr At Atwood wood did di not nt like Jk th the course eUI tile the ti defense defail wa we taking tJUI and he h and nd Mr Walsh WIh exchanged oompH compliment eom I mint ment tier Here I here h sid said Ild the th court striking ing log the th bench h were f not nfl trying the te teon case on packinghouse p rut rules |
