Show INTERESTING EVIDENCE ABOUT BLEACHED FLOUR Kansas Kannan ct I Ity June Junt 21 I I a United States distrIct attorney lurle of 01 St 81 Minn began the tho roea Irl examination of ot l lr r John A A Wt Ve enor l re r of or the Ih Columbus laboratory Chicago In thet IhA bleached Hour flour trial tria In Inthe tho the federal court hero here today loda tuda Atty AI flutter brought the th wlm to 10 admit n that he had at of a u bi be b before hal fore Core Secy tee WIon In itt II 1905 1001 that yeast tul anti the In II preparing vr destroyed dl tr d the thc In to blenched bleached flour Dr W ejier added that at al that Ihal no so 0 time line before he lie hal had experimented much tm with bleached I Hour tour he ho believed It contained nitrites I The rite h was nile w further quoted a M as before bror Kecy Het Wilson 1101 that the th proven of or bleaching flour nour was a I very verj e fine advance In II the Ih art of 01 milling I und and Ild that there wax wo as virtual no n difference In the broad brod InRI trout from blenched d unbleached flour floor ur He lIe said ii th testimony represented 1 hl hi his still MII The Tho witness said that tow raw Ial flour nour wa waA waA A poison If Ir alien In itt null clent quantities ties lies I l reH ed further by Atty Mt 1 flutter tuter he be h said that bread hr nd vas n it I If it He Ole taken In H a 10 that 11 tr and nl 1 were ero not noti i taken la ken In large doses dOHe Then shouted Atty Al Duller If It I Ier were er erit to 10 give hc Judge JI S here u a little cyanide In iii hits hlA biscuits every ter day tIcy Ia I 1 11 should not nol be he guilty of or administering polton to 10 him hll unless the th quantity were wro largo large larIA l Dr V ener I r M fat nn that list the tite 1 of whether or not nota ton a l Is III ol ol entirety entirely upon the th quantity administered I |