OCR Text |
Show 1 Millard County Chronicle Thursday, March 24. 1966 LEGAL NOTICES Probata and Guardianship Notices. No-tices. Consult Clerk of District Court, or respective signers for Information. LEGAL NOTICE CONSULT COUNTY CLERK OR RESPECTIVE PARTIES FOR FURTHER DETAILS SUMMONS Civil No. 5542 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MILLARD, STATE OF UTAH DEVON BELLANDER, ) Plaintiff. ) vs. ) NEVADA LAND AND CATTLE) COMPANY, INC., a corporation;) JAMES PHILBEE; and FRED) SYKES, ) Dofendants. ) TUB STATE OF UTAH TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS: You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon or mail to Thorpe Waddingham and Dudley Crafts, Attorneys for Plaintiff, at Delta, Utah, an answer in writing to the Complaint, and file a copy of said answer with the Clerk of the above-entitled Court within 20 days after service of this summons upon you. If you fail so to do, judgment judg-ment by default will be taken a-gainst a-gainst you for the relief demanded in said Complaint, which has been filed with the Clerk of said Court. This action is brought to recover judgment in the sum of $2,607.12 for work and labor performed by the Plaintiff for the Defendants together to-gether with interest thereon at 8 per cent per annum from October 8th, 1964 until paid, and for the further sum of $1,400.00 as a commission com-mission arising out of the sale of the ranch properties of the Defendants De-fendants during the term of employment em-ployment of Plaintiff together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from October 8th, 1964 until paid, and for general relief. DATED this 29th day of September, Septem-ber, A.D., 1965. Thorpe Waddingham Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Address: Delta, Utah Dudley Crafts Attorney for Plaintiff P.O. Address: Delta, Utah Plaintiff's P.O. Address: Box 77, Bak&r, Nevada First Publication: March 17, 1966 Final Publication: April 7, 1966 SCHOOL PRINCIPALS SOUGHT The Board of Education will accept ac-cept applications for the principal-ship principal-ship of new all-electric Delta High School and the principalship of the Delta Elementary School. Applications Applica-tions should be sent to Supertend-ent Supertend-ent Talmage Taylor, by April 8, 1966. In submitting applications please give degree, certificate, age, experience, ex-perience, personal references, etc., and a resume' of your philosophy of educational programs. The principals of these schools are both retiring at the close of this school year. . Scientists Seek Iron Chlorosis Control FINAL PROOF March 16, 19G6 Notice is hereby given that Mrs. Pearl Petersen Hansen, of Eskdale Via Garrison, Utah, who made desert entry No. Utah, 014229, for S',4 Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 19 West, Salt Lake Meridian, has filed notice of intention to make final proof to establish claim to the lands before J. E. Keogh, Manager, Land Office, at Federal Bldg., 125 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 6, 1966, 9:00 a.m. Claimant names as witness: Ernest G. Weight, Roger K. Weight, Merle C. Rawlings, Lawrence V. Allen All of Eskdale, Via Garrison, Utah. Ed. D. Cox Acting Chief, Lands Section P.O. Box 11505, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111 First Publication: March 24, 1966 Final Publication: April 21, 1966 by David R. Walker, Prof, of Plant Science and R. L. Smith, Prof, of Soils and Meteorology, USU, Logan Can a satisfactory spray program be developed to eliminate iron deficiency de-ficiency and correct the iron chlorosis chlo-rosis problems in fruit orchards? Fruit growers hope so. The old method of injecting iron citrate or iron phosphate into the tree trunk has been used with some success on pears, but a less involved, less time-consuming method is desired. A special form of iron called iron chelates has given some promising results when applied to the soil. The chelate material has been made such that it does not complex com-plex with the soil and is available for absorption by roots. The first chelate material was made with synthetic products manufactured by man. Eecause the manufacturing manufactur-ing process was so involved, it re sulted in the material being fairly expensive. Recently, however, this FINAL PROOF Notice is hereby given that Wallace W. Carlson, of Springville, Utah, who made desert Entry No. Utah, 014226, for N'-i Section 23, Township Town-ship 19 South, Range 19 West, Salt Lake Meridian, has filed notice of intention to make final proof to establish claim to the lands before J. E. Keogh, Land Office Manager, at Salt Lake City, Utah on May 6, 1966, at 1:00 p.m. Claimant names as witness: Ernest G Weight, Roger K. Weight, Merle C. Rawlings, Lawrence V. Allen All of Eskdale Via Garrison, Utah. Ed. D. Cox Acting Chief, Lands Section P.O. Box 11505, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111 First Publication: March 24, 1966 Final Publication: April 21, 1966 NOTICE The Board of Education of the Millard County School District will accept bids for the sale of the building and or site of the Lynn-dyl Lynn-dyl School. Please bid in the following manner. man-ner. If additional information is required re-quired please contact the district offices in Fillmore. Land $ Building $ Building and Land $ The Board reserves the right to reject any or all bids. TALMAGE TAYLOR, Superintendent FINAL PROOF Feb. 8, 1966 Notice is hereby given that Mrs. Sophie Van Ry, of Salt Lake City, Utah, who made Desert Land Entry No. Utah, 014224, for SESE sec. 34; SEUNEV,, SHSW14, EHSE1, SViSW'iSEU, NEUSWViSE, S-N S-N W i SW U SE '4 , N NW 14 SE Vi , SEUNW14SEU, NSWV4NW-SE4 NSWV4NW-SE4 Section 35, Township 19 S., Range 19 W., Salt Lake Meridian, has filed notice of -intention to make final proof to establish claim to the lands before Pearl Petersen Hansen, at Eskdale via, Garrison, Utah on April 12, 1966 at 1:00 p.m. Claimant names as witness: Ernest G. Weight Lawrence V. Allen Roger K. Weight L. Owen Gagon All of Eskdale, Utah. Ed. D. Cox Acting Chief, Lands Section P.O. Box 11505, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111 First Publication: Feb. 24, 1966 Final Publication: March 24, 1966 process has been .streamlined and the volume increased such that the price has been reduced considerably. considerab-ly. Yet, growers still need a more convenient control than the soil treatment. Spraying seems to offer of-fer the answer. We are testing two materials (Rayplex iron and Fe 138) in both soil and foliar applications. Our tests so far have indicated that soil applications are not as effective as spray foliar applications in increasing increas-ing the iron in the leaf or "greening" "green-ing" the tree. Both types of treatments treat-ments were applied in late May. In August, leaf color was evidently improved in the trees receiving soil applications of one-eighth and one-fourth one-fourth pound Fe 138 per tree. But the trees were not nearly as green as those receiving foliar sprays of one and three pounds per 100 gallons gal-lons of the same material using three sprays at weekly intervals, or of Rayplex at five pounds per 100 gallons. The Rayplex iron produced green er leaves earlier than did the Fe 138. We noticed differences between be-tween the treated and untreated trees within two or three days aft er he initial spray. Trees receiving either three sprays of five or ten pounds per 100 gallons of Rayplex iron greened up the trees well. Lar ger amounts of this material were used since the price per pound is about five times cheaper and we wished to compare the effects of treatments of similar cost. However, How-ever, there was not much differ ence between the trees receiving five pounds and those receiving 10 pounds. This indicated that the 5 pounds did about as well as the heavier application. Neither material gave a residual or carry-over effect from one year to the next with either the soil or foliar applications. Possibly if soil treatments were applied a number of years in succession, there would be a carry-over effect for a few years. In another experiment only one-half one-half of some trees were sprayed to compare the effect of sprayed and unsprayed portions of the same tree and to see how much the material ma-terial would be translocated or moved from one side to another. Very little, if any, translocation occurred oc-curred between the sprayed and unsprayed parts. When sprayed with Rayplex Fe the one side was dark green while the other unsprayed unspray-ed side was very pale yellow. Similar Sim-ilar results occurred with the Fe 138 treatments, although the color difference was not as striking. We plan to continue these studies stu-dies for the next few years to see what changes occur within the trees after continual application of iron. We will collect fruit samples and measure firmness, color, size, shape, sugar and acid content to A mm TWT IS, vf-A SMOKING ISN'T GOOD FOR TRACTORS, EITHER Stop tractor smoking and problems it indicates with... EWfePINK DIESEL FUEL with MP-D MP-D costs you nothing extra and gives you 5 way better tractor performance 1. REDUCES ENGINE DEPOSITS: Co op Pink Diesel Fuel with MP-D works to prevent deposits of gummy or varnish like products of fuel decomposition which coat injector plungers or plug nozzle ports. 2. REDUCES ENGINE SMOKE: Injection system cleanliness assured by this new additive. MP-D, MP-D, prevents development of undesirable exhaust smoke. 3. PROVIDES MORE POWER: Tests prove that where engine power is limited by smoke emission, emis-sion, fuel with MP-D can increase power output by 5 to 15 over non-additi.e fuels. 4. PREVENTS CORROSION: Not only will fuels with MP-D protect sensitive injectors against rusting during idle periods or during lay-ups, but it will also protect pro-tect fuel-handling systems and engine fuel systems parts. 5. REDUCES CUT-OF SERVICE TIME: The diesel engine operator can expect that the use ot W! containing con-taining 'Ethyl1' N'P D will reduce maintenance costs and out of -service time because of prolonged injector life, reduced corrosion, corro-sion, and cleaner engine operation. One fleet of trucks averaged 30,000 miles longer injector !'e with fuels using MP-D than with non sdditi'.e fuels. Call your Co op or your Available only from your petroleum salesman today! or dealer ajent. MAIL THIS 90UPON FOR YOUR FREE CAN OF MP-D DIESEL FUEL ADDITIVE. UTAH COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION 5S0 West 13th South Salt Lake City. Utah 84115 Please send FREE MP-D Sample. Name ,.,.... , Address . ., City State.., WEST HfilLLARD CO-OP Soil Test Report Is Similar to A Prescription The recommendations you receive re-ceive on youj soil-test reports are backed by many years of research. Soil test recommendations are based on hundreds of greenhouse p.nd field experiments on many different soils. These experiments have shown what yield can be obtained ob-tained from certain levels of fertil izer. In addition to conducting research, re-search, trained personnel of the University of Idaho college of agriculture agri-culture interpret the soil tests and make the recommendations. These men use this chemical analysis of your soil, your past management and fertilizer practices as reported on your information sheet, together togeth-er with knowledge of local soil conditions con-ditions to make recommendations to you. In other words, a prescription method of making fertilizer recommendations recom-mendations is used. "Don't guess Soil Test." to know about your soil before the trouble appears and before it's too late to correct it. By following a regular program of soil testing, you can avoid loss in yield and low profits resulting from hidden hunger of your crops. Soil testing is the modern way to determine your fertilizer needs. Fif Fertilizing to Your Farm llesds by Paul D. Christensen USU Extension Soil Specialist Res F. Nielson, Associaie Prof. Plant Science, USU, Logan We can't give general fertilizer recommendations that fit all farm Soil and farm practices vary too mucn irom farm to farm. It may surprise you to realize that fertilizer needs larrel v de pend upon your own skill as a iarmer. ll you manaee for hiyh crop yields, the extra production will require more fertilizer than if your management r.ially result in li: is simplv stating 1 that high yields u-r. food from the s :! It is also acknow !. I that fertilizer is on : things that infUM. U'.n. High pn due i quires more than 1 i of fertilizer. It a' ful, timely opcrr.ti , bed preparation. ;. ing, weed and ia Your USU Oh.:;:;. ent has informal: average farm cun guildelini.'S are ba soil tests and fk ,d iments. He may h; your own cond it or less fertiliser t'i. recommendations, must remember tim: fertilize you apply whether other facto are favorable anil v. fer to use minimum tilizer or maximum make possible the obtainable under v tior-This tior-This f.-ft , ' -t ..-ids. fa ;-t i nv lUL- '. ions v fit County Agent Says Soil Testing Is Practical Tool It's good business to anticipate the fertilizer needs of your crops before deficiency symptoms can be seen on the crop itself, according to county agent Jay Hall. Waiting for a deficiency to develop is a poor practice, for by then crop losses loss-es already have taken place. In present day farming, the real problem is to know how well a particular fertilizer is meeting the needs of a crop. Hall pointed out that once a farmer has embarked on a fertilizer fertil-izer program, its value in meeting the needs of the crop from year to year can be estimated by soil tests. Soil testing is a practical tool that tells you what you want see what effect the iron treatments have on fruit quality. For a beeyilfy! summer fev. . . . fertilize now with u c h .-. rirus ..i..-:v t: more iv. rage ', V'J .:nt of i i i on ;' .K t inn n;i proof pro-of Ir!'-o Ir!'-o that ..Ms i; ions. . "j.-irl n OUR STOCKS ARE HANKERIN' TO GO GROW! GET YOUR SEEDS, FERTILIZERS & SUPPLIES at QUALITY MARKET HARDVASi! r c 1 1 I u mv , JL i f 1 Irv i fn wan -rmam0mmmr' wb mmff NsgW35rp; j.t- -7 . cyw, hT "N K ' . - .'-""..ifc-.i '.. -- i'" I . ' - '- : . .'o. ...xi f.: I i v 1 for U9er V and gteater I ds ofits t haw z That , rncr financing. V financing. anu v" r , to IK" " , a 1 ..i.,nme5inw 1 tn be Security aK - wC t- care of. cal on oi tnc b soil lest i and in ' ncods. Yo.r countV v about v-"' hw;who can . a- to vou about tnc . -U be Pleaded to talV . k operations - t 1 I to us. FIRST SECURITY HA K f irt S.jrity Bcr of Uth, N A f .,, S-.vn-, f-,r-k of Idcho, N. A. DELTA, UTAH 1 |