OCR Text |
Show MILLARD COUNTY CHRONICLE Delta, Utah. Thurs., April 22, 1954' NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF LAND OWNERS OF MILLARD COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR .NOTICE, is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Millard County Drainage District Number Four have heretofore, that is to say, on the 7th day of April, 1954, filed their Annual Report with the Board of County Commissioners of Millard County, State of Utah as required by law. NOTICE, is further given that the Board of Supervisors of Millard County Drainage District Number Four have called an Annual Meeting Meet-ing of the Land Owners of the District to be heifl on Friday, the 23rd day of April. 1051. at the hour of 2 o'clock P. M. at the Seminary Building at Delta, Millard Mill-ard County, State of Utah, and that such annual meeting shall be held at the time and place hereinbefore here-inbefore stated, at which time the Annual Report of the Board of Supervisors of the District shall be given and such other business as shall properly come 'before the meeting shall be conducted. Dated this 8th day of April, 1954. MILLARD COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR By Dale Pearson, President. First publication April 15, 1951 Final publication April 22, 195b NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF LAND OWNERS OF MILLARD COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NUMBER TWO NOTICE, is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Millard County Drainage District Number Two have heretofore, that Is to say, on the 7th day of April, 1954 filed their Annual Report with the Board of County Commissioners of Millard County, Utah, as required re-quired by law. NO IILl. la further given that the Board of Supervisors of Millard Mill-ard County Drainage District Number Num-ber two have called an Annual Meeting of the Land Owners of the District to be held Saturday, the 24th day of April, 1954, at the hour of 1;00 o'clock P. M. at the Ward Hall at Deseret. Millard County, State of Utah, and that such annual meeting shall be held at the time and place hereinbefore stated, at which time the Annual Report of the Board of Supervisors of the District shall be given and such other business shall be conducted con-ducted as shall properly come before be-fore the meeting. Dated this 8th day of April. 1951. MILLARD COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NUMBER TWO By Cecil Warner, President. First publication April 15, 1954 Final publication April 22, 195b! Only A Short Time Left To r-none ycur electrical him how ycu can get in ycur heme at no cost 4Vc; ,,,11 i i ,1. r - n r i -. o . . , . i . -. - w w . . .... A f TcIIurido Power Company l-II Garden V r o j o c I n It is the time of year when we should be giving consideration to our 4-H Garden Projects. Porter-Walton Porter-Walton is again making the seed packets available to 4-H club mem bers who are going to raise gardens gar-dens as a 4-11 project. Those 4-H club members who desire this seed should contact their leader, who in turn will get in touch with the County Agent. Mrs. Emma Hunsaker, and son Leon, and daughter Kenee, left Delta early Sunday for Malad, Idaho, to join a family party In honor of Mrs. Hunsaker's father, Williams P. Camp. He was 95 years old Monday, and was being honored at an open house in Malad LPS ward, where he is a pioneer member. Mr. Camp who has visited vis-ited in Delta before, plans to return re-turn Wednesday with the Ilun-sakers, Ilun-sakers, and make a visit In Delta. Mr. and Mrs. Eb Stapley, and Mrs. Stapley's sister, Mrs. Mabel King, returned to Delta Sunday from a trip to Lansing, Mich., where the Stapleys got their new Oldsmobile for the trip home. NOTICE OF PUBLICATION FINAL PROOF. FORM "F" We John S. Clark and Katherlne M. Clark of Delta, Utah, who made entries No. 679 and No. 60.1 under the provisions of Chapter 2, Title 75, Compiled Laws of Utah 1907, as amended, commonly known as the "Carey Act," which embraces NW'SW' and E'i NW'i of Sect-Ion Sect-Ion 29, Township 15S Range 7 West do hereby give notice that each of us, husband and wife, of our Individual intention to make final proof to establish our respective res-pective claims to the above described des-cribed lands, and we expect to prove that each of us have settled upon, reclaimed and cultivated said lands as required by the laws and rules and regulations relative thereto before C. D. McNeely, who is the authorized representative of the State Land Board of Utah at Delta, Utah, on April 24, 1954, by two of the following witnesses: C. A. Shields Evelyn Shields Cecil T. ShuiU Barbara D. Shurtas All of Delta, Utah. John S. Clark, Entryman Katherlne M. Clark, Entryrnnn First Publication March 25, 1954 Final Publication April 22, 1951 cpp.iar.ce aeaier. As en electric range, v.'ired for the wiring. By doing C'H C.";n Fir y',' w . ... i . . , lwll $ih COOK . rim ' Q Wi access All Confused Genius ! In the not too surprising revel-! revel-! at ions in the case of Dr. Robert Oppenheimer which broke last I week, we seem to have another (example of a brilliant mind fallen ! victim of the false Ideas commonly common-ly lumped to gether under the heading, academic leftism. Per haps it proves that there is a limit lim-it to what one man can know and understand. Dr. Oppenheimer certainly is a genius. As one who led the advance ad-vance guard of science In the ex-, ex-, ploration of new and fearsome ' frontiers, he could only be an ex-. ex-. act and logical thinker In his spec-J spec-J lal field; one who could unerringly , detect and isolate the relevant ' factor in a problem. Yet without a doubt, the sort of research work he did would make heavy demand on the intellect. So heavy and so all consuming that there might be less than the usual capacity left over of consideration of the ordinary ordin-ary problems of life, of human relationships, re-lationships, and of sociology and economics. Almost no one thinks him the sort of a man who could be disloyal dis-loyal to his country. He seems to be one of strong loyalty, though it could be that he placed loy alty to a misconstrued ideal first In the innocent belief that the in tereests of his country could best be served through attainment of the "idear. His statement concerning his "as social ions' included these provocative provo-cative excerpts: "I might well have appeared at the time quite some if its declared objectives seemed to me desirable but never was a member of the Communist Com-munist rmrtv.. " and. "I had no clearly formulated political views I hated tyranny and repression and every form of dictatorial con trol of thought..." There you have it. The incom prehensible inner contradiction cha raeteristic of "academic leftism" which can hold that freedom from thought control might be preser ved under any form of statism, or, worse, that it could only be preserved under such system. The Wall Street Journal called this a frank statement of naivete and eullibllitv, of the sort that has led many men to let them selves be used as the unwitting instrument of subversive forces, all in the name of "liberalism". The Journal concluded. "It is sad that so brilliant a scientist should have been so easily confused. It is no Get Your re:2Ykhcitt twv$: LIVE EUCTR.'CAUY... the newt that'i fit to print from the Delta Airport By Dick Morrison Jess sad that among those who , profess a liberal faith in society his name should be legion." Of deeper interest that might appear to some is the fact, ac-j ac-j cording to David Lawrence, that ( Oppenheimer made the statement j of charges and his reply available I to a newspaper that is far to the left, the New York Times. Law- rence said further, " It was assumed as-sumed that the publicity was due to a desire to head off an attack by Sen. McCarthy. But it turns out now that the apparent purpose pur-pose or motivation by those on the Oppenheimer side was to e n-deavor n-deavor to win support In the court of public opinion". Coming as it did hard on the heels of Sen McCarthy's statement made in his reply to the attack by Ed. R. Murrow, that there was a deliberate delay in developing the H-bomb, last week's revelation revelat-ion left a lot of people intensely curious on the point. In his same article, though not referring to Oppenheimer, Lawrence Law-rence stated that "some of the same scientists who helped build the atomic bomb because they wanted it thrown against Japan and so consummate the defeat of the axis powers later opposed the making of H-bombs for use against Soviet Russia or the Communist empire". There is certainly reason to sus-pect-and here again I am not referring re-ferring to Oppenheimerthat a puzzling about face was done by influential policy makers in our government between the end of World War 11 and the Korean war. Those who directed the destruction dest-ruction of Hitler and Mussolini with fanatical zeal, and approved the dropping of the A-bombs on Japanese Jap-anese cities, turned around and argued that we must not bomb enemy supply dumps In Manchuria Manch-uria for fear of offending the enemy! en-emy! Why? The answer is clear as a bell. In World War 11, we were fighting to destroy the en-j emies of Communism. In the Kor-: ean war we found ourselves fight j ing a Communist enemy. A great deal adds up to that, and it doesn't add up any other way. I That there was a group motivated moti-vated by such purpose seems evi-1 dent. That Dr. Oppenheimer was! a member of it has not been made evident, and so the only explanation explan-ation I offer for his attitude is that he had become confused by political affairs in which he held no '.clearly formulated " views, in his own words. It seems that the need in government gov-ernment is for leadership well ver sed in all divisions of human affairs, af-fairs, guided by an understanding of the esential nature of man, his weaknesses and powers, and dedicated ded-icated to the good of humanity. But for such leadership we need hardly look either to the "overbalanced "over-balanced acadamecians", or the "practical politicians". Just where we may look for It I do not know. The Real Issue It seems clear more from the tenor of their utterances than from their words themselves, that most of .our present day "liberals" are laboring under a serious misconception miscon-ception of just what the basic issue is-sue of our day really is. Many of their arguments are predicated on the idea that It is capitalism vs. socialism. A more extreme view gives it as fascism-vs. fascism-vs. communism, and a rather milder mild-er statement is that It is individualism individ-ualism vs. collectivism. All three statements are wrong. The issue is human freedom vs. statism. People who see Soviet Russia and the United States simply as two nations with different forms of social and economic organizat ion overlook one all-important fact. The essential difference be tween the Russian economic sys tem and our own is not that the one is communistic and the other capitalistic. It is that the Russian svstem is state-ordained, while the American system is free. The Kusian people Le under a form of statism call it either socialism or communismto which they all must conform, and which in actuality, they are powerless to change. The American people. on the ether hand, are citizens of a republic which has no state- ordained " economic system. Our CsMistitution Joes not designate capitalism the American system as many people, particularly a- ni-r. proponents of state collect- u ism. seem careics:y t assume The U. a Constitution s. l.rn.ts the power of government as to pro-side pro-side a Iirce measure of economic si m. with.rt the scope of which the peojle may crier their affairs verv much as thev please. Particularly noteworthy is the fart that cur system permits cp- lur.itv for free comretiticn not ' or.lv amcr.r iniixiiil buslr.esi enterprises of the cupltaliilie nature, nat-ure, but also among various economic econ-omic systems and concepts, and types of organization. Americans have always been free to establish estab-lish individual proprietorships, par tnerships, and corporations, as well as to organize cooperatives and collectives of various sorts, even including socialist colonies. No comparable freedom is permitted by the Soviet constitution, which denies freedom and imposes state collectivism upon all of its people. Since advocates of collectiism have no need to fight capitalism in America, because free enterprise enter-prise holds no power of compulsion compul-sion over them, they cannot justify just-ify their efforts to Impose social Thi JL JL JL JL ( if -t': ft w i hy be behind working with an outmoded true!:? The new GMC light-duty models - with Truck Hydra-Matic Drive, 125-horsepower high -compression engines, smart styling and luxury cahs-cost very little more to buy and much less to run than old stjle trucks. For your pride, your convenience and your pocketbook, come see and urive a MAIN STREET You'll do WHO MAKES THE WHISKEY VOU BUY? I. V S ' , " . -. I , - J GL 553 ism upon us by law. They are not at war with cap- ( -italism, as most of them think;! and certainly they do not see the magnitude of the cataclysm that would follow the destruction of free enterprise. More likely, while they seem not to sense the fact, and certainly ! jvould care not to admit it, these j people are really at war with their j own limitations; and that may be: true of a good part of the whole I human race Perhaps man will some day learn to live with his limit-1 limit-1 ations and so resolve the conflict ; which threatens the very continu-ance continu-ance of our civilization. Failure to see that there can j be no conflict between capitalism 1 jQ.0 -of manual shifting -of clutch expense -of fuel waste -of shock loading -of skimpy power -of stodgy looks -of driver discomfort .2 k-- times and nav the nenahv of F 511 Sbmt u.u:. - Phone 281 better on a used fruck with MNTICRY STRAIGHT BOURBON" WHISKEY w-'" " 1,. '. mmmmmm m I ' II II Gleiiniore ES ! fvery Drcp Disced end Eoti'ed fcy GLENMORE DISTILLERIES COMPANY and collectivism in a free country, and that the basic issue is freedom free-dom vs. statism, is what has led a multitude of "liberals" over to the side of authoritarianism without with-out their knowing it. A good moral case can be made for collectivism, if it is practiced by a free people, although the economic ec-onomic case is weak. But the moral mor-al case for collectivism breaks down when it takes the form of state communism to be imposed by law upon those who don't want it as well as those who do. Mr. and Mrs. Perry Giles, from Ely, Nev.. visited over Easter in Delta with their brother, Clayton Giles, and family. OHO."" HYDRA-MATIC & Bt careful drive safeh - DELTA, UTAH your GMC dealer look at the label! If it rads Distilled and Bottled by, you know u bo made it, u bere it was made, and ubo bottled it. This phrase is oa every Glenmore labeL We do not use other whiskies to bottle under the proud Glenmore name. If we did, w e could not say Distilled and Bottled by. When you get Glenmore yom get uniform high quality because be-cause Glenmore it distilled and bottled by us only. Look for the word G!enmefoa the straight whiskey you buy and you'll be getting the best. LOOK FOR OH THE LABEL |